Editorials
How To Start Getting Into Horror Part 13: Gore
While it’s easy to find horror subgenre films that don’t show tons of gore, there’s this expectation that a horror film should/will bring viscera, often by the bucketload. And, to be fair, this is not an unrealistic expectation in the slightest. Horror, for decades now, has always pushed the boundaries in terms of seeing just how much an audience could stomach without going too far, although there are times when, in my opinion, they blew past that line and never looked back.
We’ve gone through a great many subgenres in my How To Start Getting Into Horror series but this is one that many of you were waiting for, wondering how I’d tackle such a topic. I’ll admit that it’s not easy, not because of the wide variety of offerings but rather because I’m always thinking how to introduce someone who is just getting started with the concept. If it’s too much, it’ll just push them away, which is the last thing I want to do. I want them to love what they see, I want them to appreciate it, and I want them to ask for more.
That’s always been the goal here, to foster and nurture a newfound passion. And from the conversations I’ve had with people about their distaste of horror, it’s almost certain that the blood and gore is going to have a strong impact on their reasoning.
So let’s try and change that, shall we? Let’s submit a few movie ideas that bring the gore but don’t make it the focus.
Okay, so I know that I already mentioned Se7en in the “Psychological“, but it was brief and, let’s be honest, this film deserves a lot more attention than it was given.
Yes, Se7en is a psychological thriller. That is undeniable. But if you want to tell me that it’s not a horror film, I’m going to argue that with you until I’m blue in the face. You simply can’t convince me otherwise. And when it comes to gore, this is a perfect entry point for many people.
Firstly, the film has several really acclaimed stars, which makes it appealing for non-horror fans to enjoy. You’ve got Brad Pitt, Morgan Freeman, Kevin Spacey, and Gwyneth Paltrow. Each of those stars have fans from their diverse filmography, so viewers can immediately feel a connection to these familiar faces.
Secondly, it’s not a film that bases itself off of the gore. Rather, the gore is meant to amplify the terror of the situation. Just think of the film and how it plays out. Yes, there are dead bodies but the majority of the gore is hidden, obscured, or out of focus, leaving it to the imagination (which, incidentally, makes it far, far worse). By avoiding showing the gore, the viewer doesn’t have to feel physically squeamish, just emotionally affected, which makes it all the more powerful .
Thirdly, it’s simply a great movie. It’s well written, wonderfully directed, beautifully shot, and it stays with you. And once that last shot goes into the credits, it haunts you for the rest of your life, the world having broken Detective Mills and, in a way, our own belief.
After that, it’s easy to get into something like Dead Alive, which is COMPLETELY over-the-top in the gore department. But that’s what makes it so entertaining! You go from the subtlety of Se7en to the sheer carnage of this film and it makes sense. It’s a transition from seriousness to humor, from sadness to levity. In fact, as weird of a pairing as this is, it’d make a great double feature if you want to get someone interested in the gorier films that horror has to offer.
After those, we all know that there are several great horror films that have a ton of gore and are extremely enjoyable. Think of titles like 30 Days Of Night and the Evil Dead sequel/remake/reboot/whatever and the vast amount of fake blood that’s used throughout. Plus, the latter is such an exciting film with TONS of gory moments.
Once you make it through films that are fun and exciting, then you can move onto ones that test the stomachs of viewers, movies like Hostel, Cannibal Holocaust, Martyrs, Videodrome, etc… These are still great movies but they have a certain…perverse approach to them. These aren’t truly meant to be films to pop on for entertainment. These are meant to assault the senses, to leave you feeling changed and different once the credits roll. And while that certainly has a place in our genre, it shouldn’t be the way to get people started.
Alright readers, that’s a quick recommendation on how to get into gory horror movies. If you have some movies or recommendations yourself, let me know in the comments!
Check out the rest of our How To Start Getting Into Horror series.
Editorials
‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements
The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.
However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.
That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.
A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.
At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.
The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.
In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.
Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.
The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.
In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.
The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.
Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.
Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.
Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.
Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.
You must be logged in to post a comment.