Connect with us

Editorials

How Would You Rank the ‘Scream’ Movies?

Published

on

Today marks the 19th anniversary of Wes Craven’s revolutionary slasher film Scream, a movie that reinvigorated the horror genre, injecting it with a healthy dose of black humor and a strong meta attitude. Now, obviously tons of horror movies before then had humor and several also went meta, including Craven’s own New Nightmare, which came out two years prior. But Scream was different in that it resounded with audiences and critics in ways that hadn’t been felt for several years.

To say that the Scream series is still an important foundation within the horror community is an understatement. Just four years ago we received Scream 4, which came over a decade since the third entry. And earlier this year, we got the first season of MTV’s “Scream“, a series that was been met with conflicting emotions but apparently did well enough to lock down a second season, which premieres in April of 2016.

So, instead of leaving a wildly open question like I usually do each Sunday, I’m going to narrowly target this week’s discussion post and ask a pretty straightforward question: How would you rank the ‘Scream’ movies?

Below is ranking and explanations and then I really look forward to reading yours in the comments!

#4 Scream 3

Something about Scream 3 just annoyed me. I understand that the series is supposed to be meta but this felt like it took it too far. The characters were bland, the end reveal felt totally forced, and it simply wasn’t as thrilling or exciting as the previous entries.

#3 Scream 4

I genuinely enjoyed Scream 4. I thought some of the performances felt a bit off, almost like subtly disdainful mockeries of the originals, but the story was fresh, it was fun, and the new “teens” were pretty great. Plus, returning to Woodsboro after so many years was pretty damn great!

#2 Scream

And it’s here that I fear I’m going to lose the support of some of you. Don’t get me wrong here, okay? I love the original! I think it’s a fantastic movie and the opening sequence is quite possibly one of the best intros in horror history. To say that it set the stage for the rest of the movie is an understatement. It revolutionized what a movie experience was meant to be. Nothing felt safe after that first scene and everything and everyone was game. But the movie hasn’t aged exceptionally well for me and some of the acting was a bit too over-the-top. Still, it’s one of the greats and I’ll always be happy to watch it!

#1 Scream 2

It felt like Scream 2 took the ideas of the first film and matured them, creating something that was simply stronger, better, and nailed everything I could want from the concept. By using the rules and events of the first film, the second created a climate of paranoia and fear that had every viewer jumping from one person to another as to “Who is the killer?” I love this sequel and everything it brought to the table.

Managing editor/music guy/social media fella of Bloody-Disgusting

Editorials

‘Arachnid’ – Revisiting the 2001 Spider Horror Movie Featuring Massive Practical Effects

Published

on

arachnid

A new breed of creature-features was unleashed in the 1990s and continued well into the next decade. Shaking off the ecological messaging of the past, these monsters existed for the sake of pure mayhem. Just to name a few: Tremors, The Relic, Anaconda, Godzilla, Deep Rising and Lake Placid all showcased this trend of irreverent creature chaos. Reptiles and other scaly beasts proved to be a popular source of inspiration for these films, but for that extra crawly experience, bugs were the best and quickest route. Spiders, in particular, led some of the worst infestations on screen in the early 2000s. And on the underbelly of this creeping new wave — specifically the direct-to-video sector — hangs an overlooked offering of spider horror: Arachnid.

In 2000, Brian Yuzna and Julio Fernández launched the Spanish production company Fantastic Factory. The Filmax banner’s objective was to create modestly budgeted genre films for international distribution. And while they achieved their goal — a total of nine English-language films were produced and shipped all across the globe — Fantastic Factory ultimately closed up shop after only five years. Arachnid, directed by Jack Sholder (Alone in the Dark, A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge, The Hidden) and based on a script by Mark Sevi, was the second project from the short-lived genre house. Yuzna was drawn to the concept largely because of its universal appeal; a monster was marketable in any region, regardless of cultural preferences or restrictions. There was also the fact that spiders give everyone a case of the heebie-jeebies.

By having extraterrestrial forces be the cause of the spiders’ mutism and immensity as well as other urgent problems within the story, Arachnid incidentally pays respect to Hollywood’s golden age of schlock filmmaking. The opening sequence indeed shows a stealth plane’s pilot (Jesús Cabrero) trailing a UFO and its translucent passenger to an island in the South Pacific, but the alien business is kept to a minimum going forward. There is no time to process this seismic revelation of life beyond Earth before moving on to the film’s central plot. 

arachnid

Pictured: Alex Reid, Chris Potter and Neus Asensi’s characters get trapped in the spider’s web in Arachnid.

Several months since the E.T. was last sighted — and after being snuffed out by one of its own accidental creations — a medical team from Guam heads to Celebes (better known as Sulawesi nowadays), in search of whatever is behind a new illness. The doctors (played by José Sancho and Neus Asensi) already suspected a spider bite, although they failed to consider the biter could be the size of a tank. With The Descent’s Alex Reid as the snarky pilot of this doomed expedition, one who has ulterior motives for accepting the job, the film’s core characters go off in search of a spider and, hopefully, a cure.

The title makes it seem as if there is only the one arachnid in the story, but once Chris Potter and Reid’s characters plus their team step foot on the island, they encounter other altered arthropods. Yuzna felt Sevi’s script needed more creatures along the way, especially before the spider showed up in full view. The bug horror commences as one gunsman succumbs to a burrowing breed of crab-sized ticks, and random characters fend off a horrific centipede with reptilian qualities. These are just the appetizers before the greatest arachnid of them all arrives. The late Ravil Isyanov, here playing a zealous but sympathetic arachnologist, becomes a human Lunchable for the spider’s eggs. And one of the doctors gets a face full of corrosive spider spew. So, there is no shortage of grisly predation in the film, with a few bits of the monsters’ handiwork possessing a haunting quality to them.

Shot quickly and cheaply, Arachnid is fast-food horror. It’s convenient and designed for immediate consumption, and will likely not linger on the palate. Usually there is not a lot worth remembering with these slapdash genre productions, however, this is one case of spider horror where the extra effort made a difference. Apart from the egregious use of digital imagery in the outset, Jack Sholder’s film primarily employs practical effects. And these are not rubber spiders dangling from strings or being flung at the actors, either. Fantastic Factory aimed much higher by securing DDTSFX (Pan’s Labyrinth, Hellboy II: The Golden Army) and creature designer and makeup artist Steve Johnson (Species, Blade II).

arachnid

Pictured: One of the spider’s web-covered victims in Arachnid.

Arachnid, while far from flawless, somewhat redeems itself by having chosen practical effects and animatronics over CGI, which had become the new normal in these kinds of films. And this class of creature-feature was definitely not getting the sort of advanced VFX found in the likes of Eight Legged Freaks. Steve Johnson’s spider was not the easiest prop to work with, and it lacks the movement and versatility of a digital depiction. However, there is no beating that sense of weight and occupation of space that makes a tangible monster more intimidating. Viewers will have trouble recalling the human characters long after watching Arachnid, yet the humongous headliner remains the stuff of nightmares.

Over the years, the director has spoken critically of the film. He originally held off on agreeing to the offer to direct in hopes that another project, a Steven Seagal picture, would finally manifest. No such luck, and Sholder accepted Arachnid only on account of his needing the work. He said of the film: “I thought I could […] make it halfway decent, but I discovered there wasn’t a whole lot I could do.” Nevertheless, Sholder’s experience as a director of not exactly high-brow yet still rather entertaining horror is evident in what he has since called a “dud.” While there is no denying the reality and outcome of Arachnid, even the most mediocre films have their strokes of brilliance, small as they may be.

Arachnid

Pictured: The poster for Arachnid.

Continue Reading