Connect with us

Editorials

We Visit the ‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’ Sets in England!

Published

on

Images courtesy of Sony Screen Gems

After a nine hour flight, an hour train ride, and a shameful amount of time trying to navigate the Underground, I arrived at London’s Langham Hotel looking, for lack of a better word, like a zombie. Thankfully, the doorman didn’t try to stab me in the head when I passed. Instead, he tipped his top hat in greeting and my adventure visiting the set of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies had begun.

Adapted from Seth Grahame-Smith’s humorous reworking of Jane Austen’s classic novel, “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies” director Burr Steers’ film version has had a tumultuous history coming to the big screen. Following years of multiple filmmaker, writer, and star shuffles and a complete halt to production, PPZ is coming to theaters February 5 – just in time for Valentine’s Day. Awwww.

Back in November 2014, Sony was gracious enough to invite Bloody Disgusting to England for a late night set visit. After punishing my hotel room’s mini-bar, I was whisked away for a long drive south of London to the foggy rural village of Old Basing. It was a cold, wet night and the other journos and I spent most of it huddled close to a heater, surrounded by zombie corpses. Hell, it was kind of a perfect evening.

Over the course of several hours, we got to watch some filming take place and talked with many of the film’s stars, producers, effects people, and writer-director Steers. They talked the establishing the tricky tone of the film, their approach to zombies, and more. If there’s one major nail all of them hammered home, it’s that there will be absolutely no winking at the camera.

Steers stated, “My mantra on it was the big wink of the movie was not to wink. Was to play it straight, which is what I’ve tried to do with it.” He explained that PPZ is set 70 years after a zombie pandemic decimated a deal of the population, particularly affecting the lower classes. In Austen’s novel, the Napoleonic Wars are a central backdrop. In Steers’ film, it’s the zombie wars, in which men are trained to fight against the undead hordes while some women – like the Bennet sisters – fight at home. Steers added, “The class themes and issues that (Austen) had, class and money, but also young women being empowered, were things that we kept in.”

Screen-Shot-2015-07-03-at-10.01.16-AM-620x400

Okay, okay. But you have beautiful young women in corsets stabbing zombies. That’s a difficult visual to play straight. “The ideas was to create this sort of alternate world where this pandemic has taken place and then to stage Pride and Prejudice in it,” Steers continued. “That doesn’t sound very funny, but it is because ultimately it’s absurd but you pay it straight. No one’s paying it hitting punch lines and things like that.”

Producer Allison Shearmur expounded on this, “The biggest thing with this movie was always going to be the tone…Steers did a phenomenal job with the screenplay and the screenplay seems to integrate an emotional story that follows the classic beats of Pride and Prejudice but there are zombies.”

With the current zombie craze all over TV and film, the makers of PPZ knew that they had to take a unique approach to their undead to stand out from the pack. Steers explained, “One of the big influences on this for me was Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend and having (zombies) see themselves as a race that was competitive with the human race and to have them more cognizant and more formidable. They’re not just wandering around waiting to be decapitated.”

Actor Sam Riley, who plays Mr. Darcy, added, “People have been able to begin to hide the fact that they’re zombies. There’s a new breed of neo-zombie who try and keep up the pretense, and until they feed on human brains they can more or less get away with it.”

As far as the look of the zombies go, special effects supervisor Chris Reynolds joined us to explain their period appropriate approach. “It’s quite difficult to do something completely different because there’s been so many zombie films done before. What really differentiates it from any other film is the fact that it’s period zombies. So we’ve concentrated on creating looks that go with the costumes and the hair styles of the period.”

Being that it’s a zombie virus pandemic, the filmmakers created a sort of zombie CDC guide for their undead. “The idea is that it’s a disease and there are four stages of the disease. We have four stages of it, so you’d be infected and then you’d become a full-blown zombie and then you’d start deteriorating from the point where you were bitten. And then you have crypto zombies who are the zombies that haven’t fully gone over, they’re sort of in between.” He added, “The ones that are able to maintain more of their human intelligence are the ones that are becoming the leaders amongst the zombies.”

Screen-Shot-2015-10-09-at-9.21.14-AM-620x400

Standing in the way of a full-blown zombie orgy takeover of Pemberley are the Bennet sisters – played by Lily James, Belle Heathcoate, Millie Brady, Suki Waterhouse, and Ellie Bamber. Like in Austen’s novel, the societal pressures to get married to a suitable suitor weigh all of the sisters down. On top of this burden there are, you know, zombies to kill.

And each Bennet sister takes her own approach. “I’ve got my daggers,” Brady says. “I’m all for the dagger business. We’ve all got our different weapons…different styles. Bella is very elegant. She’s quite reserved but very beautiful when she does it. Ellie is so energetic, and Sookie is straight in there and quite deadpan and I’m very aggressive. Lily’s very aggressive as well.”

Leading actress Lily James may be aggressive in the film, but she wasn’t familiar with the source parody novel when she was sent the script. “When I saw the title I thought what the hell is this? And then I read the script, which I thought was really brilliant and funny…I think that period drama just needs zombies!” When it comes to her ass kicking skills, Lily explains, “Liz Bennet is a dagger/sword ninja. I always fight with two, but she has a dagger on her at all times. I think we always have a weapon because there could be a zombie at any moment.”

When she’s not fighting off zombie scum, Liz Bennet is fighting off the advances of Mr. Darcy. Their riotous relationship is a legendary one of literature and in PPZ, it gets a little more violent. Lily says, “We had the proposal scene, where I suddenly start beating the shit out of him and I just get sucked away in the moment. Even though they’re plastic swords, they really hurt if you jab them at someone.”

For Riley, stepping into the shoes of such a famous character meant bringing his own flavor to the role. He based his sword-carrying, leather coat-wearing version of Darcy on a stew of “Colin Firth, Sean Connery from Dr. No, and the voice of James Mason.” Riley, who has a voice like warm tar, talked about the tricky tone of the film. “We’re trying to avoid it being too camp. We want people to feel the romantic elements of it and believe this is 17-whatever and society is more or less unchanged, because the British like to pretend things aren’t happening around them, but there’s this horror going on that people have become accustomed to as well.”

He couldn’t help but laugh at the absurdity of the concept. “Yeah, they’ve been trained enough to protect themselves. And there’s also the army, who’s now used to primarily deal with the zombie…(laughs) Oh it’s all fucking ridiculous. But that’s why I liked it.”

Riley also gave the best answer to our question about how the cast would survive a real zombie apocalypse, “I’d drink myself stupid and hopefully the zombies would think I was one of them.” Perfect.

Amidst the roundtable interviews, producer Shearmur treated us to a sizzle reel featuring work from the first four weeks of shooting. Though she warned us it was hastily cut together, the footage we saw showed that despite my misgiving about the tone, it appears Steers and co. may have nailed the damn thing. What we saw was super fun and well-shot for both a period drama and action film.

Despite the cold of the night, the atmosphere on set was a warm one, with the cast goofing off in between takes and the crew being incredibly courteous to our American asses. Ultimately, I left England with a strong sense that PPZ is going to shatter many expectations and bring a wholly unique vibe that mixes period drama and horror action.

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies opens everywhere February 5.

Patrick writes stuff about stuff for Bloody and Collider. His fiction has appeared in ThugLit, Shotgun Honey, Flash Fiction Magazine, and your mother's will. He'll have a ginger ale, thanks.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading