Editorials
[Readers’ Choice] 7 Things You Should Never Say To Horror Fans!
The horror genre isn’t exactly what you would call highly regarded, and the legions of fans that support it are no different. As horror fans, we are occasionally looked down upon by the general population, but that’s probably because they’re jealous we have a legitimate passion for something, right? Telling someone you’re a horror fan (especially if you work in an industry that has nothing to do with horror at all like I do) can be a coming out process all on its own. People react strangely to it, and some people react worse than others. I decided to take to Twitter* and ask the horror community what they were tired of hearing from non-horror fans, and boy did I strike a nerve! Here are seven of the most prevalent responses I received from all of you.
*I plan on making this a recurring series of posts where I ask a question on Twitter and post the responses in a post here, so if you would like a chance to be included in a future post start following me on Twitter at @TracedThurman.
1. “There’s Too Much Gore!”
Lots of horror movies have gore. I personally love gore, but that doesn’t mean a horror movie has to have it in spades in order for me to like it. These people know what’s up.
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting it’s gross! You’re gross!
— Carolyn Poddig (@SoCalRamen) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting “I can’t watch horror movies because of all the gore.” So many great horror films are light on blood & gore.
— Alexandr S. (@alexsamocha) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman when the only thing non-horror fans talk about is the gore. There’s so much more to horror movies than JUST gore.
— Tim Schilling (@timjschilling) April 5, 2016
2. “You Must Like Actual Blood Too!”
I actually get a little faint at the sight of real blood. I’m glad to know I’m not alone!
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting a friend once cut her finger & I looked away & she said, “but u like horror movies, I thought you liked blood”🙄
— Efrain Franco (@efie) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting A co-worker, after finding out I liked horror films, recommended a site that showed crime scene & autopsy pics.
— Matt Wedge (@MovieNerdMatt) April 5, 2016
3. Anything Sexist
Not only is it offensive to act surprised when a woman says she likes horror, it’s fucking rude. Don’t assume that all women love romantic comedies and musicals (though it’s okay to love those things to…I do). Horror isn’t just a man’s genre. It’s everyone’s genre!
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting “Horror is for, and only watched by, teen boys.” Not historically true. Easy, tired way to denigrate the genre.
— Lindsey Decker (@alindseydecker) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting “I’ve never met a woman who likes horror.” Bullshit. You probably just haven’t spoken to enough women.
— Theresa DeLucci (@tdelucci) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman@BDisgusting “How can a nice girl like you like horror?” Because being a girl and a horror fan are not mutually exclusive.
— Brittany Sandler (@besandler) April 5, 2016
4. A Generalization of the Genre
There are tons of horror movies out there, and they all have a wide variety of traits. You can’t generalize any genre, and horror is no different. Also, it’s not as dumb as people make it out to be (though it certainly can be). And just because you didn’t like Saw doesn’t mean you don’t like horror. That is one type of horror film. Find the sub-genre that suits you. You’ll find something you like!
People making overarching generalizations about the genre based soley on wide releases like The Gallows, Ouija, etc. @TracedThurman
— Eric O’Polka (@Stickie_22) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman “Horror is only about mindless, emotionless deaths.” That horror can’t have depth, story, or meaning. Done hearing that.
— Matt Donato (@DoNatoBomb) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman@BDisgusting “I don’t like horror. The last horror movie I saw was Saw 3 and it sucked.”
— Suskel & Ebert (@bodegaboxoffice) April 6, 2016
5. Insinuating That There’s Something Wrong With Us
Horror fans are people, just like everyone else. Just because we enjoy a good horror film doesn’t make us lesser people. If anything, our shared passion for an underrated genre brings us closer together as a community. Some of my best friends are horror fans. Don’t belittle us just because you don’t get it.
@TracedThurman “What is wrong with you.”
— girl introvert (@girlintrovert) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting “Ha, I thought you were normal!” 😔 I get revenge by sending them scary gifs at night 😜
— The Horror Hunter (@horror_hunter) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting “Why do you like horror? Is there something wrong with you, like, mentally?”
— Chad (@chadiscollins) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting “You’re a psychopath”
— Michael Roberts (@michaelpavicic) April 5, 2016
6. “Horror Is Stupid and For Stupid People”
Just because we like horror doesn’t mean we’re stupid. Many horror fans also liked films like The Revenant and Carol this year (Seriously, go see Carol. It was robbed at the Academy Awards). “Smart horror” also exists, and if you don’t believe that then you clearly don’t watch enough horror movies.
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting those movies are crap, no real story there. You should watch something like (insert dry art house film here)
— Candy Dax (@iamcandydax) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting “horror movies are for dumb people who cant understand (insert any Best Picture nominee @ the Oscars that year)”
— bloodyblackout (@bloodyblack0ut) April 6, 2016
7. “X Movie Is Not Even Scary!”
Out of all of the responses I received on Twitter, this was the one that was brought up the most. People seem to think that if a horror movie isn’t scary, then it isn’t good. Our own Jess Hicks wrote a great piece on this exact topic a few months ago and I even wrote another one asking readers what even qualified as scary anymore. A horror movie doesn’t have to be scary to be good. Fear is subjective, and what one person may find terrifying may have no effect on a different person. And to all of you non-horror fans out there: jump scares do not qualify as “scary.”
@TracedThurman Four dreaded words: “This isn’t even scary”
Note to non-horror fans: Horror doesn’t have to be scary to be fun.— Kevin Sommerfield (@krsommerfield) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting “that’s the worst movie ever! it wasn’t even scary!”
— Cody Landman (@cody_landman) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman “Horror movies suck because they’re not scary. They are just blood and guts and jumpscares.”
— SKUNKROCKER (@skunkrocker) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman @BDisgusting “It isnt even scary…” Not all horror movies have to be scary to be brilliant!
— Dean (@z3anogo) April 5, 2016
@TracedThurman@BDisgusting When you mention your favorite movie & they say: “that’s not even scary, there aren’t any jump scares.” 😒
— H ä x a n (@Haxan_Aok) April 5, 2016
Do you agree with many of these people? Let me know in the comments below and share what you are tired of hearing from non-horror fans! We need to be heard!
Editorials
André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies
In this day and age, the word “troll” is often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.
It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shouts “troll” at the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.
For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.
The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.
As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?
Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.
Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.
There is always a small risk whenever using the term “mockumentary” to describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.
In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.
Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.
Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we call “found footage“.

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.
You must be logged in to post a comment.