Editorials
‘Creep’ and the Horror of the Subtle Psychopath
One of the most disturbing villains in recent memory is not a masked lunatic or a nefarious demon, but rather a seemingly innocuous Craigslist user. His name is Josef, and he can be found in Patrick Brice’s deeply unsettling found-footage movie Creep. Played by Mark Duplass, the character does not do anything overtly malicious for the majority of the picture’s runtime, but his unusual behavior and passive-aggressive comments become as terrifying as the actions of a chainsaw-wielding maniac. Through Josef, the film examines the horror of the subtle psychopath.
In Creep, Patrick Brice plays Aaron, a freelance videographer who responds to a Craigslist ad for a one-day assignment in a remote mountain town. That sounds like the setup for something sinister, and Aaron is skeptical from the get-go, especially when he shows up at the prearranged time to an empty house. Soon enough, though, Josef arrives, and he’s not some sort of obviously evil man running towards Aaron with an ax. Rather, he comes across as a normal dude getting back from a run, although there’s something off that we can’t quite identify. One of the first comments Josef makes to Aaron is, “You have a really nice, kind face.” Huh. That’s kind of bizarre to say to a stranger, right? Is Josef super friendly but a bit awkward, or should Aaron be worried? We expected his intentions to be pronounced straightaway, but so far that is not the case.
Our initial apprehension fades away after a few minutes with Josef, who explains that he’s a cancer survivor who was recently diagnosed with a brain tumor and has two months to live. His wife is pregnant, so he has hired this videographer to record a tape for his unborn son. In case he is not able to successfully combat the tumor, Josef wants his son to know what his father was like; he and Aaron will spend the day together capturing as much footage as possible. This situation is compared to the 1993 film My Life, in which Michael Keaton plays a terminally ill man making home movies to be given to his child. When Aaron decides he’s down for the job, Josef smiles and says, “I thought you were going to run away.” We feel bad for ever doubting Josef’s motives, and we want to give him a hug and tell him it’s all going to be okay.
Moments later, everything gets weird again. Josef says he’s going to get into the tub, and he invites Aaron to come in with him. Hang on…what? He wants a total stranger to film him taking a bath? Maybe he’s just an incredibly open person who doesn’t understand why that would make Aaron uncomfortable. Could that be it? Our opinion swings right back around as Josef says that he used to take baths with his dad as a child, and we breathe a sigh of relief. The initial invite into the bathroom was awkward, but when put into the context of a dying father who realizes he may never give his baby boy his first bath, it makes more sense.

This first act of Creep is a constant tug-of-war of emotions, as Patrick Brice revels in ambiguity and ensures we never know what to make of Josef. Is he literally about to break out an ax and chop Aaron’s head off? Or is he a lonely guy looking to make friends before death but who sometimes unintentionally drives them away? Both scenarios are equally plausible, so even during seemingly unimportant dialogue sequences, we never feel fully secure. Many found-footage movies waste the audience’s time with excruciating filler, but every millisecond of Creep speaks volumes.
As we soon learn, one facet of Josef’s peculiar personality is what he describes as his strange sense of humor. He’s always scaring Aaron just to amuse himself, such as when he sinks into the tub pretending to contemplate suicide before jumping up and screaming. Who does that? Later, he runs away from Aaron in the woods, only to sneak up behind him for a scare. This could be interpreted as the actions of a psychopath who is testing exactly how far he can push his victim before they snap and who is working himself up to finally strike. But it could also be that Josef merely has poor people skills and does not register that Aaron isn’t enjoying the humor. Because Josef appears to be so unassuming, Aaron can’t justify voicing major objections, and the cycle continues.
Josef also really overshares throughout the film, creating uncomfortable situation on top of uncomfortable situation. It starts with the bath scene, but there’s also the fact that he’s frequently making physical contact with Aaron when they don’t know each other. He often goes in for hugs, and during one dialogue scene, he begins rubbing Aaron’s arm, a gesture that’s really only appropriate in a close relationship. At lunch, when Josef apologizes for secretly taking pictures of Aaron, he says he wouldn’t have done it if he knew Aaron then the way he knows him now. He’s speaking as if they are suddenly friends of several decades rather than two people who met literally one hour ago. The hesitation in Aaron’s voice is easily perceptible, but he holds back and does not want to hurt Josef’s feelings.

For the majority of Creep, every unacceptable action Josef takes has an alternate explanation that makes us reluctant to judge. He scares Aaron in the bathroom, but then that’s because he was trying to lighten the mood. He takes pictures of Aaron without his knowledge, but then he profusely apologizes and says he did so because he was nervous about meeting a stranger. There is always just enough to rope Aaron back in and prevent him from running away.
It finally becomes clear that Aaron is in danger when he speaks with Angela over the phone, and the film reveals Josef’s entire story has been a lie. Angela, who is actually Josef’s sister and not his wife as previously stated, explains that her brother “has a lot of problems.” Even now, then, Aaron isn’t confident in what he’s dealing with. After Aaron escapes, Josef begins sending him packages in the mail, one of which contains a heart locket with pictures of the two of them. Josef is now quite definitively an unstable man who has gone full stalker, but does he have murderous intentions? To what extent is Aaron at risk?
The situation is horrifying regardless, and that is precisely because of the uncertainty. Villains are scarier the less we know about them, which is why it’s best to keep their backstory vague. Yet even with an enigmatic character like Michael Myers in the original Halloween, it’s still obvious that he’s the antagonist. We can point to the killer as being objectively evil and more like a monster than a man. Creep is so frightening because it suggests that identifying real-life monsters is rarely as easy as it is on screen. They don’t provide us unmistakable warning signs or bare the mischievous appearance of a Disney witch. In our world, outside the context of a three-act narrative and self-evident character roles, determining who might wish to do us harm is distressingly tricky.

In fact, most of us probably know someone like Josef in the first act of Creep. They’re outgoing and friendly, but they’re also a bit too open and they frequently invade the personal space of others without sensing resistance. They make jokes that leave their peers feeling extremely uncomfortable, justifying this as an example of their “weird sense of humor.” They’re always pushing people to see how much they will tolerate, instantly offering an apology when the behavior is questioned while never altering it in any way. Are we describing someone who is difficult but harmless, or someone who is dangerous and should be avoided at all costs?
We may not know the answer until it’s too late, as is the case with Aaron. Josef’s final move is to send Aaron a tape explaining that he has been pretending his whole life and has burnt every bridge, but all he really wants is a friend. In reality, this is merely yet another act of manipulation on Josef’s part, but Aaron isn’t convinced that this is the case. Despite dozens of red-flags, he wants to believe that Josef is kind at heart, and so he arrives at Lake Gregory willing to give him another chance. Ultimately, this trusting nature is his downfall.
No matter how cynical we might purport to be, most of us are very much like Aaron. We want to believe that others are fundamentally good in spite of their flaws. That person who has been treating me badly, we tell ourselves, is simply confused and imperfect, so they deserve a second chance…and then a third chance, and a fourth chance. We need to be cautious of the kind of over-the-top nutcase on display at the cinema, but not of seemingly average people. Right?
Unfortunately, real villains don’t wear crazy costumes or masks; they blend seamlessly into society, and their motives are just ambiguous enough for our guard to be lowered. That doesn’t mean we should live in a constant state of paranoia, but as Creep concludes, we ought to be as wary of emotionally abusive, toxic individuals as we would be of a Freddy Krueger or a Jason Voorhees. If only they were as easy to spot.

Editorials
‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements
The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.
However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.
That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.
A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.
At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.
The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.
In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.
Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.
The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.
In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.
The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.
Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.
Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.
Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.
Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.

You must be logged in to post a comment.