Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’ Ended 13 Years Ago Today

Published

on

Buffy Series Finale

In every generation there is a Chosen One. She alone will stand against the vampires, the demons, and the forces of darkness. She is the Slayer.

On May 20, 2003 Buffy the Vampire Slayer went off the air for good. Joss Whedon’s groundbreaking series about a Los Angeles teenager who was chosen to save the world (a lot) by fighting the forces of evil (it wasn’t just vampires y’all) until her death. Buffy the Vampire Slayer holds a special place in many people’s hearts, and for good reason. It was filled to the brim with relatable, quirky and lovable characters that happened to live on top of a Hellmouth.

To say that Buffy the Vampire Slayer was critically lauded would be an extreme understatement. Since it premiered in 1997, it has ranked among many top publications’ “Best Of” lists,* including (but not limited to):

  • 41st on TV Guide’s list of 50 Greatest TV Shows of All Time
  • 2nd  on Empires “50 Greatest TV Shows of All Time”
  • 27th on The Hollywood Reporters “Hollywood’s 100 Favorite TV Shows”
  • 3rd in 2004 and 2007 on TV Guides “Top Cult Shows Ever”
  • Listed in Time magazine’s “100 Best TV Shows of All-Time”
  • List of “The 60 Greatest Dramas of All Time” and ranked it #38 on its list of the “60 Best Series of All Time”.
  • 3rd Best School Show of All Time by AOL TV.

*From Wikipedia.

It is interesting to talk to a younger generation about Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Even today, 13 years after its end, it is still misunderstood as “that silly show about a girl who fights vampires” by people who have never seen it. Or they start to watch the first season and think it’s lame (Just make it to season 2 you guys! “Surprise” was the turning point episode for me). If only everyone could have had the same experience so many other did while watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer. It was a truly special experience.

To describe my passion for Buffy the Vampire Slayer and how emotionally tied to it I am would take a novel’s worth of words, but I just wanted to use this space to bring attention to one of the greatest television shows of all time. Joss Whedon really made me feel like these characters were actually my friends, and watching reruns after the series ended was an important part of my teenage years (it’s very queer-friendly, in case you didn’t already know). It’s also a big part of the reason I would sell my soul to Satan himself to get to meet Sarah Michelle Gellar (or Emma Caulfield, or Alyson Hannigan, or Eliza Dushku, et al). But I watched Buffy the Vampire Slayer at a time in my life when I was bullied and picked on frequently, so the series acted as my safe haven. My umbrella, if you will. I feel like a lot of fans of the series were in a similar situation as me, and in that the show has brought many of us together.

As was usually the case with shows of Buffy’s kind, I was not allowed to watch it while I was growing up. My parents didn’t let me start watching it until I was in 8th grade, which is when the final season aired. I was just 14 when the series went off the air, and by that time I had rapidly caught up during the previous year by watching the reruns FX would air at 5am and 6am every morning (they would re-air those same episodes at 3pm and 4pm that afternoon, so it made it easy to catch up in case I missed one). By the time the finale aired I was mostly caught up, and what a satisfying finale “Chosen” was.

I could go on and on about how I’ve seen “Once More, With Feeling” at least 20 times and how I play the soundtrack on my iPhone at least once a month. I could describe the seven episodes that have made me cry (“Passion,” “The Body,” “The Gift,” “Hell’s Bells,” “Grave,” “Selfless” and “Chosen”). I could explain my reasoning behind ordering the seasons from best to worst like this: 3, 5, 2, 6, 4, 7, 1 (it’s not that I hate the first season, it just hasn’t aged nearly as well as the others). I could even write a character study on why Anya Christina Emmanuella Jenkins Harris is the absolute best character in the show.

I won’t do any of that though, because I want to hear all of your thoughts and stories on this fantastic series. If you’ve never watched it, go to Netflix right now and start a binge-watch. Just make it past that first season (as I mentioned above, it’s always difficult to get people into Buffy specifically because that first season, sans the finale, has not aged very well). If you’ve already seen the entire series three times or more, take an hour today to go back and re-watch “Chosen,” the series finale of this truly special show.

What are your fondest memories of Buffy the Vampire Slayer? What were some of your favorite episodes? Who were your favorite characters? Do you still watch episodes on Netflix (or your DVD box sets) today? Let us know in the comments below or shoot me a Tweet, as I’m always game for discussing some Buffy. In the meantime, please enjoy these 50 amazing Anya moments.

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

62 Comments

Editorials

The Mark of the Beast: The Lasting Impact of ‘The Omen’ at 50

Published

on

The Omen at 50

Of the three films that make up the Diabolical Trinity of classic religious horror films—Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), and The Omen (1976)—The Omen is the most purely entertaining.

While Rosemary’s Baby digs into the societal shifts of the 60s and The Exorcist explores spiritual tensions between faith and doubt in an ever-shifting world, The Omen seems most interested in just telling a thrilling story. It achieves this by blending two major trends of the 1970s, the devil movie and the paranoid thriller, into one crackling adventure yarn. In the process, The Omen has sparked fear and curiosity about what could happen in theend timesif such events are to occur.

After seeing The Exorcist, producer Harvey Bernhard contacted writer David Seltzer and said something along the lines of,Hey, write me one of those.Seltzer, having never read the Bible, thought it would be an interesting challenge, so, according to various interviews, he read the Bible and several commentaries in search of a story. Then he stumbled upon a passage in the book of Revelation, the image of a great Beast rising out of the sea, that sparked his imagination. In the commentaries, he found that the sea represented politics in some interpretations of the text, and he began building his story on that foundation.

Seltzer has told this story often, and I am inclined to believe him. However, from there, much of the theological-sounding lore of The Omen was created purely by Seltzer. Many of the ideas surrounding The Antichrist in the film appear to be drawn much more from the pop-eschatology sensation of the 1970s, The Late Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsay, than any Biblical source.

Lindsay’s book was the bestselling nonfiction book of the 1970s and re-popularized views of thelast daysthat had been dying along with fundamentalism for decades, namely Dispensationalism, Millennialism, and the Pre-Tribulation Rapture. In dispensationalism, history is broken into several epochs of time (or dispensations) that culminate in the return of Christ and his thousand-year (millennial) reign.

Before this return, a seven-year Tribulation will occur in which the Antichrist comes to power and persecutes all who oppose him, culminating in a battle between the forces of good and evil at the valley of Megiddo, usually called Armageddon. Of course, in this worldview, the true believers in Jesus will be lifted out, or raptured, before all this takes place. Since the publication and popularity of The Late Great Planet Earth, this has been the prominent belief in Evangelical and Fundamentalist Christian circles, though Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and mainline Protestant denominations largely reject it.

Lindsay also did something unique that had not been the case even in dispensationalist circles before him—he posited that the creation of the modern state of Israel in 1948 started the countdown to Armageddon. Fans of the film will immediately realize where Seltzer ran with this idea in the first line of the poem created for the movie:When the Jews return to Zion…

Damien Thorn and the Creation of Horror’s “Innocent Villain”

The Omen

Seltzer’s next inspiration focused on the idea of the Antichrist as a child, what he would call the film’sinnocent villain.In watching The Omen, it is readily apparent that Damien Thorn (Harvey Stephens) does not really do anything evil beyond a bit of normal kid mischief. Even the moment in which Damien knocks Kathy Thorn (Lee Remick) over a second-floor railing can be read as an accident orchestrated by Damien’s diabolically connected nanny, Mrs. Baylock (Billie Whitelaw). The film takes this idea of the innocent villain a step further by casting Gregory Peck, best known for playing arguably the greatest father in film history, Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird (1962), as Damien’s earthly father, an element that greatly satisfied Seltzer.

The New Testament itself says very little about the Antichrist and certainly nothing about his childhood. In fact, the word antichrist is used twice (1 John 2:18 and 2 John 7 for the curious) and refers to groups of people, not a particular person. There is also a passage in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 in which the writer (usually attributed to Paul) discussesThe Man of Lawlessnesswho willexalt himself over everything that is called Godandproclaim himself to be God.

Then there is the Beast of Revelation chapter 13 withseven heads and ten hornsthat Seltzer latched onto, which has been interpreted in a multitude of ways over the centuries. Powerful people throughout history, from Charlemagne, various Popes during the Protestant Reformation era, Napoleon and Hitler, to modern politicians, including Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, have all had the label placed on them by various circles. Even religious leaders like Billy Graham have not escaped being called the Antichrist.

Lindsay and modern dispensationalists are certain the Antichrist will be a 21st-century individual as they are equally certain that the Rapture, Tribulation, and return of Christ are imminent, likely within their lifetime. Many scholars and theologians, however, interpret these passages as symbolic representations of the Roman Empire and the first-century Caesars who persecuted, tortured, and murdered Christians and Jews who refused to submit to Imperial rule and worship them as gods. For example, that the Beast from the sea in Revelation has seven heads is symbolic of the famous seven mountains of Rome, with the 10 horns referring to rulers and magistrates of the Empire.

But this is all really of no matter to Seltzer and the story of The Omen. Instead of being concerned with any historical or theological accuracy, he instead built his own lore, which sends Robert Thorn and photographer Keith Jennings (David Warner) on a globetrotting investigation into the nature of the Antichrist and how to stop him. Some of this lore includes the child being born of a jackal, the reaction of animals, the protective cult that arises around Damien, the daggers of Megiddo, and maybe most interesting of all, the peculiar flaws in Jennings’s photographs that presage the ways certain individuals will die.

All these aspects are where the paranoid thrillers come in, as films like Blow Up (1966), Z (1969), The Conversation (1974), The Parallax View (1974), 3 Days of the Condor (1975), and All the President’s Men (1976) were all the rage at the time. Especially in the wake of the Watergate scandal, the idea of journalists (like Jennings) as ordinary heroes who could bring down the powerful, nefarious forces in the world was exactly what audiences craved. And what greater hidden evil force was there than the Devil? This is also why the device of the daggers of Megiddo is so important to a movie like this. If Damien is indeed the Antichrist, there must be a way to stop him, though in the Biblical text, the only power capable of destroying the Devil is God Himself.

The Mark of the Beast, 666, and the Film’s Most Famous Religious Symbolism

The piece of lore created for the movie with the most solid Biblical grounding is the Mark of the Beast. Revelation describes a mark on the forehead or hand of those who worship the Beast and his image. Again, this is symbolic language differentiating those who belong to the power of the Roman Empire and those who belong to Christ, who have the Mark of the Lamb. In Seltzer’s hands, the mark is very literal, a birthmark that is borne by not only the Antichrist but all his followers, meaning they are marked from before birth as belonging to Satan, and there is no escaping it. This is all rather distressing to the priest Father Brennan (Patrick Troughton), who betrays his mark by warning Thorn about Damien and pays the price by memorably being impaled by a spire that falls from a church steeple after being struck by lightning.

Why is the mark three sixes? Again, this is drawn from a passage in Revelation that states that the Beast can be identified by calculating his number. In Biblical scholarship, this is believed to be the sum of the name of a man transferred into Hebrew numerology, a practice in which each Hebrew letter also represents a number. Using this method, the number of the name Caesar Nero, which many believe to be the most logical choice, is six hundred sixty-six. In the film and elsewhere, this number is changed to three individual sixes. According to the film, this represents the Diabolical Trinity (a designation also unique to the film) made up of Satan, the Antichrist, and the False Prophet. That Damien carries this unique birthmark under his hair convinces Robert that the child is the Antichrist, and it’s up to him to destroy him.

Part of what makes The Omen great is its ambiguity. Damien could be the Antichrist, or he could be at the center of a series of coincidences. Director Richard Donner stated in interviews that he believed Robert Thorn had gone insane by the end of the film, which, to Donner, is the only explanation for why Thorn would attempt to kill an innocent child. However, that enigmatic smile in the final shot suggests that Damien does embody a spirit of great evil. The sequels, however, all but erase this ambiguity.

In audiences, The Omen sparked a renewed interest in the concept of the Antichrist and the dispensationalist interpretation of the end times that continues to echo throughout the last five decades. Around the time of the film’s release, even Elvis Presley was photographed brandishing a paperback copy of Seltzer’s novelization. Dispensationalist authors like Hal Lindsay, Tim LaHaye, and John Hagee have made millions publishing books and giving lectures about the Antichrist and the end of the world.

The Legacy of The Omen, 50 Years Later

Though A Thief in the Night (1972) preceded The Omen in initial release, it gained quite a resurgence (along with the ability to create three sequels) in the wake of the popularity of The Omen and went on to scar the psyches of Evangelical children for decades. Hal Lindsay was also able to release a film version of The Late Great Planet Earth in 1978, complete with narration and a brief onscreen appearance from Orson Welles.

In the 1990s, the Left Behind series became a cultural phenomenon, spawning twelve books in the core series, a YA spinoff series, video games, and a movie series (2000-2005) starring Kirk Cameron. A bigger studio adaptation of the first book was released in 2014, starring Nicolas Cage. 20th Century Fox and The Omen got in on the renewedend-of-the-worldvigor by releasing a remake of the original film on June 6, 2006. The franchise was revived once again in 2024 with The First Omen, which explores ideas of the Antichrist and the motivations of those in power in our current religious, social, and political context.

But despite all the sequels, spinoffs, rip-offs, remakes, andend timesmoney grabs of the last 50 years, the original version of The Omen remains untouchable. Its greatest strength is that it seeks, first and foremost, to entertain. And it does so admirably.

After half a century, its influence can be felt in horror, the culture at large, and even in various faith circles. It is a testament to the power of story and film that, consciously or unconsciously, fans of The Omen and those who have never seen it alike are, to this very day, marked by the Beast.

Continue Reading