Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

5 Things You Didn’t Know About ‘The Invitation’ Including a Shocking Revelation

Published

on

The Invitation

Karyn Kusama’s paranoid thriller of manners, The Invitation (read our review), hits Blu-ray next week, and we got an early taste of some of the special features including the audio commentary featuring Kusama and co-writers Phil Hay and Matt Manfredi. As far as commentaries go it’s a good one. The trio dive deep into the themes of the film as well as some of the  inspirations behind the project. Kusama also discusses the process of shooting the film along with some of the challenges of shooting in a single location.

I’ve assembled five interesting facts about the film you may not have known including a shocking revelation about the fate of a character that will forever change the way you view the film.

[Mild spoiler warning]

1. The original cast was full of stars

zachary-quinto-luke-wilson-topher-grace-johnny-galecki-invitation-slice

Sometimes familiar faces can ruin a good story, hindering suspension of disbelief or creating narrative expectations that lead viewers wandering from the filmmakers’ intentions. The talent of these actors aside, The Invitation may have dodged that bullet when it ended up losing its originally announced cast, which included Luke Wilson, Zachary Quinto, Topher Grace and Johnny Galecki.

In the end, Logan Marshall-Green (Prometheus) leading a cast of virtual unknowns allows audiences to focus on the film’s mounting dread and not the star power.


2. Kusama was inspired by 70’s thrillers

AllThePresidentsMenTitle Untitled

While All the President’s Men, Three Days of the Condor and the early work of Brian DePalma don’t share a similar narrative to The Invitation, they set the stage for Kusama’s approach to the style of her film. Even The Invitation‘s simple title card, which Kusama describes as “spare and offset,” gets attributed to All the President’s Men and other films of the era that she says took a radical approach at the time.


3. They put a big tent over that house

Instead of filling a schedule with grueling night shoots, the production team tented the house where the film takes place to create the illusion of darkness outside while they shot during the day. The only scene Kusama insisted they shoot at night was the dinner scene at the center of the film which had the cast surrounded by windows.


4. Claire didn’t make it

Claire

This one really bums me out, folks. In a particularly tense moment at the center of the film, one of the dinner guests, Claire, decides she’s had enough of the strange evening and announces she’s going to leave early. Despite everyone’s best efforts to convince her to stay, she stands firm, grabs her bag and gets the hell out of the house.

Tensions rise when Pruitt ( The Walking Dead’s John Carroll Lynch) , a character we’re already on edge about, says his car is blocked her’s in the driveway and he needs to move it before she can leave. The two venture outside and we’re left wondering if Pruitt has anything more sinister on this mind, or if Claire made it home unharmed. Since the film has a strict main character POV, we’re left inside and wondering along with Will.

I always liked the ambiguity of Claire’s fate and saw her decision to leave as a cautionary tale of sorts. Too often we adhere to social morays at the expense of better judgement and even personal safety. Even when our mind cries out that a situation may not be safe, we stick it out and hope for the best rather than rock the boat. It’s an odd human trait and Claire’s firm stance to leave the party when it was getting too weird for her gave me hope that it meant she’d beaten the odds in this case.

But, alas, my hopes have been dashed. Kusama reveals in the commentary that Claire was indeed attacked off screen bu Pruitt and a scene of her in the bushes, dying from her wounds, was eventually cut from the film for story reasons. This will forever change the way I view the film.


5. The director and screenwriter are married

Karyn Kusama’s is married to Phil Hay, the screenwriter of big Hollywood films like Æon Flux, the recent Clash of the Titans remake and R.I.P.D. When Hay and his writing partner Matt Manfredi were working on The Invitation, they approached Kusama for her thoughts on the story at which point she expressed an interest in directing the film.

14 Comments

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading