Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

The Real Story Behind ‘Cherry Falls’

Published

on

Cherry Falls

In the years following Scream‘s release in 1996, studios rushed to release as many witty slashers as possible to capitalize on the meta slasher phase before it fizzled out. From I Know What You Did Last Summer to Urban Legend to Valentine, each film seemed to get worse and worse with each subsequent release. This is why it is so upsetting that Geoffrey Wright’s (Romper Stomper) rather brilliant film Cherry Falls, which celebrates its 16th anniversary today, had its theatrical release cancelled in lieu of a television premiere on the USA Network. It also saw multiple cuts after the MPAA and the U.S. Senate came down on violence and sexuality in teen films following the Columbine shootings. Cherry Falls isn’t a great movie, but it’s certainly a good one. It is one of the better Scream copycats to be released in the years following Wes Craven’s classic. So what exactly happened there? Why wasn’t this above average slasher given a proper release and why was it cut apart in the editing room? I’m here to tell you why.*

*All information is pulled from the director’s commentary and various interviews from Scream Factory’s recently-released Blu-Ray of Cherry Falls.

In case you haven’t seen it, Cherry Falls is a slasher film that flips the horror genre on its head by telling the tale of a serial killer who targets virgins in a small town aptly named Cherry Falls. Starring Jay Mohr, Michael Biehn, Gabriel Mann, and the late Brittany Murphy, Cherry Falls is a fun, under-seen gem from the turn of the century that is finally seeing an increased popularity thanks to Scream Factory’s Blu-Ray (I even missed it upon its original release and only now just saw it for the first time). For the sake of anyone who hasn’t seen the film, spoilers will be kept to a minimum as the killer’s reveal, while not the most original plot development in horror history, still manages to surprise.

Cherry Falls was going to be distributed by October Films, a major U.S. independent film production company owned by Universal Pictures. After filming wrapped, Universal then sold its shares of October Films to Barry Diller in 1999, who merged it with Gramercy Pictures and renamed the new company USA Films. When this happened, all Hell broke loose.

At the time of Cherry Falls‘s impending release, the Senate was having hearings over sex and violence in teen films. It threw a spotlight on Cherry Falls and USA Films, being a new company didn’t want their first release to defy what the Senate said they should do. Thus the film was given a TV release as opposed to a theatrical release (though it did get released in some European theaters after selling to every major territory at Cannes), and all deleted footage was lost. With a budget of $14 million, Cherry Falls has the distinction of being the most expensive TV movie ever made.

The film was written by Ken Selden as a satire with plenty of comedic elements but was directed by Geoffrey Wright, who viewed it as a far more serious film. Wright kept much of the satire, but also increased the horror, removing much of the comedy from Selden’s script. This would ultimately hurt the film when put in front of the MPAA (Scream faced similar issues with its climax but the MPAA lightened up when director Wes Craven told them it was meant as a comedy), who repeatedly slapped it with an NC-17 rating.

Cherry Falls

Things got tense fairly quickly on the set of Cherry Falls. Given a 30-day time frame to shoot the film, Wright went over-budget and behind-schedule early on into the shoot. Selden points out that many scenes that he wrote weren’t even able to be filmed because of this (though the flashback to Loralee’s rape was added in by Wright) and scenes had to be rushed during filming since they had limited time and weren’t able to return to locations after they had left. This meant that many scenes in the final cut were the first and only take, which is actually pretty impressive. Selden politely notes that Wright had a very specific vision for Cherry Falls and frequently clashed with members of the crew, specifically cinematographer Anthony B. Richmond (who made a name for himself shooting films like Don’t Look Now and Candyman and now shoots films like Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel). Wright admits to this in his commentary and even confesses to irritating actor Jay Mohr for demanding a flexible schedule from all of the actors. He even tells an anecdote in which Richmond walked off the set and didn’t come back for almost two days because Richmond thought he was using too much blood in one sequence. Wright’s commentary on Scream Factory’s Blu-Ray is quite fascinating and he does take responsibility for most of the tension present on the set.

In a post-Columbine world, the media eye was on violence in cinema. The late 90s and early 00s saw many horror films trimmed of much of their violence. This holds true for Cherry Falls as well, with nearly all of the death scenes lacking in the gore department. Wright himself admits that a very soft version of the film was released. Graphic shots were taken from the opening kill and a scene in which a deputy’s head is cleaved in half with an ax. Even the killer’s death by impalement is missing the shot of the actual penetration. Wright informs his listeners that all of these shots were filmed, but unfortunately had to be removed from the film to appease the Senate, the MPAA and USA Films.

While much of the violence had to be trimmed, the teen orgy ended up causing the most problems with the MPAA. After all, you can’t just show a bunch of minors having a sex party (well, you couldn’t in 2000 anyway). Interestingly enough, Selden wrote the scene to feature a “sea of white sheets.” In his script, which comes as an extra with the Blu-Ray, viewers wouldn’t actually see most of the orgy taking place. Instead, they would see the shapes of bodies moving under the sheets. When the killer is chasing Jody (Murphy) through the house, the audience would simply see the sheets with splashes of blood randomly appearing on them. Wright chose to go a more graphic route and show everything in plain sight, resulting in the film being given an NC-17 rating multiple times. Since Wright was obligated to deliver an R-rated film, nearly all of the nudity (mostly topless females) was cut from the scene.

So where is all of the footage that had to be cut in order to obtain the R rating? Wright insists that it still exists, stating twice in the commentary that studios never lose footage. They only misplace it. If this is indeed the case, then it’s quite possible buried below tons of lost footage in the Focus Features vault. If that is the case, Scream Factory couldn’t find it. There is still hope though. One day it might be discovered in the archives randomly, at which point Scream Factory (or another Blu-Ray distributor) can re-release the Blu-Ray with the uncut version. Selden rightly points out that Blumhouse could make the film today for $5 million and get by without any cuts. Maybe a remake is in order? The slasher genre could use a reboot and remaking Cherry Falls might be easier than finding that lost footage.

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

23 Comments

Comics

‘Spider-Noir’ Comic Changes Explained: How the TV Series Reinvents Marvel’s Darkest Spider-Man

Published

on

A little while back, I wrote an article chronicling the Hellraiser franchise’s affinity for Film Noir and touched on how that genre has, historically, always been connected to horror.

This connection can be observed in everything from the cannibalistic serial killers of Frank Miller’s Sin City to the disturbing criminal plots fueling neo-noir thrillers like Stuart Gordon’s underrated King of the Ants. That’s why it came as no surprise when I finally sat down to watch all eight episodes of Prime Video’s recently released Spider-Noir series and was confronted with plenty of classic horror tropes.

What did come as a surprise, however, was how showrunners Oren Uziel and Steve Lightfoot approached these horror elements when compared to the 2009 comic book that the show is based on. From the heavily altered rogue’s gallery to an equally terrifying yet completely different origin story for Nicolas Cage’s take on the webslinger, there are plenty of changes here that I feel might be of interest to genre fans.

With that in mind, I’d like to invite readers to take a closer look at all the adjustments that Spider-Noir made to the story in order to bring this incarnation of Spider-Man to life in all of its monochromatic glory (unless you watched the True-Hue color version of the show, in which case you’ll be treated to a surprisingly comic-booky palette that you don’t usually see on television).

The Dark Origins of Marvel’s Spider-Man Noir

Our first order of business should be to examine the origins of the Noir comics themselves. Originally published as part of the Marvel Noir alternate universe that reimagined several characters as hard-boiled crime-fighters, Spider-Man Noir became the most successful book in the entire run. This highly politicized story about Peter Parker coming to terms with the capitalist evils of the Great Depression seemed to have struck a nerve with audiences looking for a darker take on the wall-crawler, which is likely why we’d soon see several sequel stories as well as a video game adaptation of the character in 2010’s underrated Spider-Man: Shattered Dimensions.

Of course, it wasn’t just Spider-Man’s darker disposition that made this version of the character a hit, as 1930s New York City was depicted as being much more hostile than what we generally see in the standard Marvel Universe. From Peter’s powers coming from an Eldritch Spider God that spawns man-eating arachnids to Vulture being an ex-Freak-Show Gimp with a taste for human flesh, you can definitely understand why this Web-Head isn’t pulling his punches.

Unfortunately, this alternate universe was a little too popular for its own good, with each subsequent sequel/adaptation further diluting the political anger and classic horror influences that fueled the original comic-book run in order to appeal to a wider audience. Spider-Man Noir was nearly unrecognizable once we got to the Spider-Verse crossover that turned the character into a household name, though this would at least lead to an interesting adaptation in 2018.

The Classic Horror Influences Hidden Throughout Spider-Noir

Jack Huston as Sandman in ‘Spider-Noir’

When Phil Lord and Chris Miller finally translated Spider-Man Noir to the big screen, with Nicolas Cage bringing the character to life in an unexpected case of pitch-perfect casting, he was still mostly relegated to comic relief as his nazi-punching antics and over-the-top edginess were played for laughs. However, while this version of the character had little to do with the comics that spawned him, Spider-Noir’s newfound popularity eventually resulted in the announcement of a darker live-action spin-off – a spin-off that I was cautiously optimistic about.

While the showrunners ultimately decided to go in a completely different direction than the 2009 comic, the new team of writers appeared to understand Noir as a genre in ways that even the folks at Marvel Noir couldn’t quite grasp. That’s likely why 2026’s Spider-Noir boasts plenty of horror elements, just not in ways we’ve seen them before.

The series is obviously borrowing tropes and aesthetics from period-accurate monster movies, with Universal’s 1930s output being a particularly big influence. From the re-imagining of Sandman and Tombstone as tragic figures to The Spider even being operated on by a mad scientist with hilariously antiquated techniques, this bizarre collection of super-powered freaks could have easily shown up in a classic creature feature.

The scares aren’t all retro, however, as the showrunners also injected plenty of body-horror into the mix during their attempt at unifying the origin stories for all these larger-than-life characters. Hell, the Spider himself is now revealed to have gained his powers after being bitten by a half-mutated Man-Spider during World War I, and the aforementioned mad scientist keeps a disturbing collection of failed experiments in her basement, proving that not all of her patients were lucky enough to simply gain superpowers after being experimented on.

Nicolas Cage Reinvents Spider-Man Noir for Television

Ben Reilly/Spiderman (Nicolas Cage) in SPIDER-NOIR
Photo: Aaron Epstein/Prime
© Amazon Content Services LLC

I also really appreciate how Cage insists on depicting Ben Reilly as an arachnid trapped inside of a human body, with his uncanny physical performance and classic Hollywood impressions keeping your eyes glued to the screen while also providing some of the show’s funniest moments.

I still think it’s a shame that the character is no longer politically motivated, and I miss the detail about Uncle Ben having been cannibalized by Vulture after his social activism ruffled too many feathers, but at least this time our protagonist actually feels like someone who could have been written by Raymond Chandler if he were a fan of Superheroes.

In fact, the writers nailed the snappy back-and-forth that Noir authors like Dashiel Hammett used to refer to as the “riposte”, and it’s fun to see supervillains being depicted as horrific movie monsters instead of specialized henchmen – with The Spider feeling like just as much of a Freak Show attraction as the rest of them. Purists might be put off by the lack of reverence for the source material, but I think that’s a small price to pay when even the show’s most clichéd moments intentionally harken back to the golden age of Hollywood.

That’s why I’d argue that Amazon’s Spider-Noir isn’t really an adaptation, but rather an equally valid take on the same premise that inspired Marvel back in 2009. And in a world filled with recycled storylines that only serve to advertise future releases, I’d rather have two completely different visions of the same character than a straight-up retelling of the same handful of ideas.

At the end of the day, there’s enough space inside this comic fan’s heart for both man-eating Vultures and a Cronenberg-inspired Man-Spider. And if you’re also a fan of nostalgic creature features with comic book flair, I’d highly recommend this street-level superhero story with a spooky twist.

Continue Reading