Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

5 Ways ‘Ouija: Origin of Evil’ Improves Upon ‘Ouija’

Published

on

You may have heard that the prequel nobody asked for, Ouija: Origin of Evil, was released nationwide last weekend. You may have also heard that it’s pretty damn good. This shouldn’t come as a surprise, considering it was co-written and directed by Mike Flanagan, the mastermind behind such wonderful horror films like OculusAbsentia and Hush. The man simply gets the horror genre and knows how to set up a good scare (this is one of the reasons I’m particularly excited to see his script of I Know What You Did Last Summer enter production).

Ouija: Origin of Evil opened with $14 million its opening weekend, which is almost $6 million less than what Ouija opened with two years ago. That film went on to gross $50.8 million domestically, and while Origin of Evil will probably end its run with about $36 million, it’s still a decent gross considering its $9 million production budget. Ouija: Origin of Evil isn’t a perfect film, but it is a significant improvement over the original and a step in the right direction for the franchise. What did Flanagan and co-writer Jeff Howard do to make the film work as well as it does? There are many things, but five of them stick out the most.


1. It Has Characters You Actually Care About

Flanagan and Howard’s screenplay wisely opts to focus on the family rather than the scares. Not that there aren’t any scares in the film (more on that in a bit), but Origin of Evil puts the spotlight on its trio of leading ladies. It rarely sacrifices a moment in favor of a cheap jump scare. The characterization of those characters is enhanced by the nuanced (and outstanding) performances given by Elizabeth Reaser, Annalise Basso (Oculus) and Lulu Wilson, but Flanagan and Howard’s screenplay give them great material to play off of. Can you say that about any of the characters in Ouija?

Ouija Origin of Evil


2. It’s Scary

Okay, Ouija: Origin of Evil may not be the scariest movie ever made and the villain’s appearance may be a bit of a knock-off of the lipstick-faced demon in Insidious, but the film still has plenty of delightfully creepy moments. Wilson earns all the credit for the film’s scares though. When her face isn’t being digitally altered to look  like the monster from the short film Lights Out, she does everything she can to instill a sense of mounting dread. Much of this is through Flanagan and Howard’s dialogue. For example, in once scene Wilson’s character Doris describes what it feels like to be strangled in vivid detail. It takes up less than a minute, but it’s truly disturbing. Origin of Evil employs a few jump scares, but they are few and far between more subtle moments layered with a dread-inducing atmosphere.

Ouija: Origin of Evil


3. It’s Self-Aware

We all know the phrase “Let’s split up, gang!” Made famous by Scooby-Doo, Where Are You, the phrase has become the name of one of the biggest horror movie tropes to ever exist (the franchise started parodying the trope in the 1980s cartoon A Pup Named Scooby-Doo, but I digress). All too often we see a group of characters decide to split up when staying together would clearly be the safest thing to do. Origin of Evil avoids this trope by having Paulina tell her mother that her decision to split up is an incredibly stupid idea. It’s not like Origin of Evil is the first movie to ever do this (Scream, The Cabin in the Woods and many others have called out the trope), but it’s just one example of how the film is self-aware without bashing you over the head with it. The film is filled with meta moments and homages to other horror films (like the below shot from The Exorcist) that lets you know it’s not trying to rip off other films, but rather show them respect. Origin of Evil is still able to establish its own identity even with all of the homages. 2014’s Ouija merely embraced all of the tropes, making for a wholly generic film.

A still from William Friedkins' The Exorcist, which Ouija: Origin of Evil homages.

A shot from William Friedkin’s The Exorcist, which Ouija: Origin of Evil homages.


4. Mike Flanagan*

Much of the praise for Origin of Evil’s quality is being heaped on Mike Flanagan, and for good reason. He could have had the same reaction everyone did when the prequel was announced. But rather begrudgingly take the job and phone it in, he wrote a carefully thought-out script with Jeff Howard and directed the hell out of it. He is a crafty director that has managed to take mediocre material and give it a fresh coat of paint. He is a better director than the film probably warranted, but I sure am glad he took the gig. Whether you like his films or not, you can’t deny that the man clearly has a passion for the films he directs, and that passion is evident in Ouija: Origin of Evil.

*I have been accused in the comments of stroking Flanagan’s ego in my posts. What can I say? I like the guy’s work and he has yet to make a horror film that I don’t like. Sue me.

(L to R) Doris (LULU WILSON), Alice (ELIZABETH REASER), Father Tom (HENRY THOMAS) and co-writer/director MIKE FLANAGAN on the set of "Ouija: Origin of Evil."

(L to R) Doris (LULU WILSON), Alice (ELIZABETH REASER), Father Tom (HENRY THOMAS) and co-writer/director MIKE FLANAGAN on the set of “Ouija: Origin of Evil.”


5. It’s Visually Gorgeous

Origin of Evil is a period film. Set in 1967, the film almost feels like it was made in that time period. Flanagan even used the old Universal logo to open the film and included cue marks to make the digitally-shot film feel like it was shot in 35mm. It’s subtle touches like that that make you appreciate the film even more. Patricio M. Farrel’s vintage sets are simply stunning, as is Michael Fimognari’s cinematography. He captures the look of the late 60s with (as our own Jimmy Champagne noted in his review) a meticulous eye, giving Origin of Evil a timeless feel. The fun doesn’t stop when the movie is over either. The closing credits scroll as if being viewed through the glass circle on the Ouija board’s planchette. A lot of care went into the look of the film and it shows.

Ouija Board

Ouija: Origin of Evil is nothing you haven’t seen before. In fact, if there is one complaint to be had about the film it’s that the whole thing is a little too familiar (the fact that it comes to us after Insidious and The Conjuring does it no favors). That being said, it is still much better than it has any right to be, and represents a step in the right direction for the franchise.* If the name Ouija turned you off of the film, I implore you to give it a shot before it leaves theaters. You won’t regret it!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

11 Comments

Editorials

Steven Spielberg Just Directed the Scariest Scene of His Career in ‘Disclosure Day’

Published

on

Colin Firth in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

Steven Spielberg has always been conversant in the cinematic language of the horror genre, despite relatively few credits in the genre. His contributions as a writer and producer on things like Poltergeist are legendary, and films like Duel and Jaws certainly wield the horror genre in remarkable, often chilling ways. He may not be a horror filmmaker, but he knows when he needs to scare us, and he has the tools to make that happen. 

I didn’t go into Disclosure Day, Spielberg’s alien epic, expecting outright horror, and indeed the film leans much more into thrilling than frightening. This is not a horror film, but for a few minutes in the middle, much to my surprise, it became one.

Spielberg has filmed more than his fair share of scary scenes over the years, but with Disclosure Day, he directed a new contender for the scariest scene of his entire career. 

SPOILERS AHEAD for Disclosure Day!

Josh O’Connor in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

Among the various alien secrets laced throughout Disclosure Day are a trio of palm-sized rods, the color of pencil graphite. These rods, originating from another planet, can be used for a number of things, but for the purposes of this scene, the most important is “diving,” gripping the rod in one bare hand and using its power to “dive” into the mind of another person. 

The person holding the rod in this scene is Noah Scanlon (Colin Firth), head of shadowy cybersecurity firm Wordex, who is hellbent on keeping human knowledge of extraterrestrials secret from the general public. Scanlon’s trying to find whistleblower Daniel Kellner (Josh O’Connor), who’s got all of those alien secrets tucked in a backpack while he’s on the run, and while Daniel’s more experienced mind is protected from diving, his girlfriend Jane’s (Eve Hewson) is not. So, monitored by medical personnel at Wordex headquarters (diving is dangerous), Scanlon pushes his way into Jane’s mind to find the location of Daniel’s safe house. 

A telepathic invasion is scary enough on its own, but Spielberg doesn’t stop there. When Scanlon dives into Eve’s mind, he appears to her to be sitting across the kitchen table, like he’s in the room. Her bright blue eyes turn Scanlon’s dark brown, and she loses much of her control over her own body, not to mention her mind. Moments before, Daniel finally shared with her the secrets in his backpack, so Jane is shocked, conflicted, deeply vulnerable when Scanlon slips inside her head. This is not just telepathy. This is possession. 

Spielberg underscores this not just through the visual language of the scene, as Jane breaks out in a sweat and struggles to sit upright as Scanlon invades her mind, but through Jane’s background. As she revealed to Daniel earlier in the film, Jane is a former novitiate nun who left her convent when she began to question her calling. She still believes firmly in God and, more importantly, believes that perhaps proof of alien life should be kept secret from the public because, in her eyes, it would upset the entire balance of faith in the world. God is a defining factor for humankind, Jane argues, and showing humanity proof of creatures from the stars would undercut that in dangerous ways. 

This context, combined with the crucifix necklace Jane’s holding in her hand at the time of the dive, makes this scene the closest thing Spielberg will ever shoot to something out of The Exorcist. It’s not just a battle of wills, but a battle of faith. As an amoral technocrat worms his way into her memories, her beliefs, her faith, Jane turns the crucifix into a weapon, squeezing it until her hand bleeds when she discovers that a pain response can momentarily push Scanlon out of her head.

Of course, when you put a crucifix and a bloody hand together, it conjures images of stigmata. Screenwriter David Koepp pushes the allusion further by having Scanlon quote Christ on the cross to Jane by way of convincing her that she must be the one to stop Daniel by any means necessary.

It’s easy to see why this is scary, right?

On a very basic level, you have a powerful, wealthy man subduing and assaulting an innocent young woman, which is frightening enough. Then, the layers of the scene kick in. Scanlon doesn’t just assault Jane, but possesses her, seizes her memories, her knowledge, and finally her own free will, all while Jane literally clings to her faith in an effort to fight back. Disclosure Day is, among other things, a story about who has a right to the truth, and Scanlon believes that he should be the arbiter of that truth. Not just the truth as he sees it, but the truth as Jane sees it as well. If they don’t see eye to eye, he’ll make her. 

But the possession, as it turns out, cuts both ways. Using the rod to dive is, for a normal human being, an intensely strenuous process. Scanlon admits that previous attempts almost killed him, and for some members of his time, so much as touching the rod results in a near-death experience. Even accessing an unprepared mind like Jane’s takes a lot of Scanlon, and when she kicks him out by squeezing the crucifix – again, so much meaning embedded in the details here – his team holds him back and tries to offer medical intervention. But Scanlon persists, pushing them away, and keeps diving back in.

This means that Jane can’t escape him because he just won’t stop pushing back through her defenses, but it also means that each time Scanlon enters her mind, and thus the safe house, he looks more monstrous. By the end, through a combination of lighting and makeup, Firth barely looks human, conjuring up images of the possessed Father Karras at the end of The Exorcist.

Colin Firth (center, standing) in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

On a pure, visceral craft level, all of this is quite frightening, but the real trick to making this scene into Spielberg’s most terrifying lies in the more existential horror surrounding all of this. Disclosure Day is a film about the battle for the truth over extraterrestrials, but it’s also about a fight against an impossibly powerful surveillance state, the devaluing of human and alien lives in favor of some nebulous collection of assets, and the value of the individual in a world that increasingly lumps people into demographic boxes and writes them off.

In this scene, the surveillance state becomes supernatural, a human life is worth less than a piece of information, and an extragovernmental technocrat would rather sacrifice his own humanity than see reason. In 2026, few things could be more terrifying than that. Spielberg knows this and wields it mightily, proving once again that, while he’s not a strictly horror filmmaker, he can direct horror with the best of them.

Disclosure Day is in theaters now. 

Eve Hewson (second from left) in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

Continue Reading