Editorials
[Set Visit Report] How John Carpenter Inspired the Set of ‘The Strangers: Prey at Night’
Writer/director Bryan Bertino made quite the impression with feature debut, The Strangers, in 2008. Inspired by the Manson family Tate murders and a series of break-ins during his own childhood, Bertino’s feature saw its leads terrorized by three masked killers over the course of an evening. The film became a surprise hit, grossing $82.4 million at the box office worldwide, and left fans clamoring for a sequel. Finally, that long wait for a follow up is nearly at an end; the lethal masked trio is back to terrorize a new set of victims with 47 Meters Down director Johannes Roberts at the helm.
While the 2008 movie was praised for its atmosphere and tension, the remote childhood summer home in which the film was set contributed a great deal to what made The Strangers so special. The warm, everyday nature of the well-lived in home juxtaposed with the creepy, remote location made the house an uncredited character among an already minimal cast. So, it’s no surprise that followup film looks to recapture that same feeling with a unique setting of its own.
In June of 2017, I was fortunate enough to visit the set of The Strangers: Prey at Night, nestled in the dense woods of northern Kentucky, and tour a small portion of the 56-acre plot of land dedicated to recreating a summer lakeside mobile home community. Speaking with the cast and crew, I learned a lot about what we can expect from the sequel, and I’m happy to report that it looks as though it’s going to be a very thrilling continuation of the beloved modern horror classic.
“For the story, we wanted to go with this so that it doesn’t feel dated when you look at it in five years. The first Strangers film I thought did it really well; I look at it now and the lack of technology doesn’t date it. It doesn’t necessarily say ‘2008,’” production designer Freddy Waff (Bone Tomahawk, Burying the Ex) explains on his approach to designing a timeless set that features 22 retro mobile homes and 8 RVs, all strategically placed to avoid giving a sense of location or direction.
Over the years, though, mobile home communities have built up an unsavory reputation, which is the opposite of the almost retro, vacation aesthetic that Waff created, adding, “They built mobile home parks in the ‘50s as sort of getaway places for people with money, like out in Palm Springs. There’s a couple of really big mobile home parks on the way out to Palm Springs, which were sort of pushed as vacation getaways. I did a lot of research on styles of trailers and brands of trailers and this is where we landed because this seemed to be the best version for what we were doing here.”
Having done extensive research on mobile homes, mobile home parks, and the aesthetic of the original film, Waff’s extensive research didn’t end there. He revealed an impressive catalog of classic horror that he watched with director Johannes Roberts when trying to hone in on what made a horror film endure the test of time, namely the films of John Carpenter. “Have you seen Christine lately? Man, it’s great,” Waff exclaimed as he dubbed the film an underappreciated classic, particularly for its impressive practical effects when it came to the titular car’s destruction. There’s no better reassurance that this sequel is in the right hands than a crew that knows and loves the genre as much as the fans; that are fans themselves.
As we walked down a desolate street lined with mobile homes, Waff gave us a peek inside two of the mobile homes that will feature key scenes in the film. Stepping into both felt like stepping into a time capsule, each one decorated in great vintage detail, right down to the retro wallpaper. Each mobile home brought on to the set were manufactured between 1970- 1986 to keep with the style Waff selected, and though Waff had to start from scratch to recreate the empty interiors, the homes reflect that dated era almost completely, save for a few details that places the film in a modern setting. There are also a good number of visual throwbacks to the original film, including a vinyl turntable located in what was dubbed the “hero’s trailer.” Though Waff warns it won’t be utilized in quite the same way as it was in The Strangers.
The scale of the mobile home park recreated in the dense Kentucky woods is impressive, and Freddy Waff’s intelligent production design makes such a large space still feel claustrophobic. With the film set after summer, most of these mobile homes have emptied out as the inhabitants have returned to their lives, making for several interesting places for both the victims and their masked pursuers to hide. It’s clear that Waff and Roberts have taken great care to retain the essence of what made the original film special, while widening the scope at the same time. The playground for the masked killers to play on has grown bigger and more interesting, and that’s very exciting.
Click here for the next part of my set visit, which includes details on the scene being filmed during my visit, and an interview with actress Bailee Madison about her character.
The masked maniacs return on March 9, 2018.
Editorials
André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies
In this day and age, the word “troll” is often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.
It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shouts “troll” at the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.
For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.
The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.
As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?
Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.
Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.
There is always a small risk whenever using the term “mockumentary” to describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.
In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.
Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.
Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we call “found footage“.

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.


You must be logged in to post a comment.