Editorials
Is Julie James the Worst Final Girl in Horror History?
On Independence Day, many Americans host barbecues or watch fireworks. I watch I Know What You Did Last Summer, the much-maligned Kevin Williamson-penned slasher film that tried to cash in on the success of Scream (which was also written by Kevin Williamson) in 1997. I’ve made my love for I Know What You Did Last Summer known in the past, and it always bums me out to see so much hate for it. There has been so much backlash against the film online, especially on this website, and most of it I don’t agree with. Is it a perfect movie? No. But it’s nowhere near as bad as everyone says it is. As a matter of fact, it’s not even bad.
Most of the film’s flaws are forgivable. I can look past the hefty amount of suspension of disbelief required when the killer is able to move a body and dozens of crabs out of a car trunk in a matter of minutes without anyone seeing him. Hell, I can even overlook the fact that he is able to display 8″x12″ prints from pictures he took that very same morning. Those are minor quibbles in an otherwise solid slasher. Unfortunately, during my annual rewatch this year, I realized one thing about the film that simply doesn’t work, but before I get to that let me explain why I love I Know What You Did Last Summer, which turns 20(!) in October.
I have seen I Know What You Did Last Summer at least 50 times. I was eight years old when it was released and I wasn’t allowed to watch it because it was rated R, so I would watch the trailer over and over on my VHS copy of Anaconda (Other trailers on that VHS? The Fifth Element, Starship Troopers, The Mask of Zorro and Masterminds). Side note: the trailer for the film is great and you should watch it, especially if you like Kula Shaker. Anyway, a few years later TNT started showing I Know What You Did Last Summer once or twice a month and I recorded it on a blank VHS, eventually wearing it out because I was watching it twice a week (along with a TBS showing of Deep Blue Sea that I had also recorded). This movie was a big part of my pre-teen years and I can’t really explain why I gravitated toward it the way I did, but I just did.
The Alamo Drafthouse (aka the best movie theater in the world) has a Signature Series called Terror Tuesday in which they show a different horror movie every week at 10pm. Joseph Ziemba, the programmer of that series, clearly understands the greatness of I Know What You Did Last Summer, as he selected it to be The Terror Tuesday screening on July 4th of this year. Since I was never able to see I Know What You Did Last Summer in a theater, I jumped at the chance to attend this screening.
***SPOILERS for a 20-year-old film below***
Have you ever noticed that you catch more things in movies that you may not have noticed before when you see them in a theater? I suppose it’s because your attention can’t be diverted like it can at home. So on what was probably my 51st or so viewing of the film I noticed something that I had never noticed before: Julie James is a terrible Final Girl. In fact, she gives Pam from Friday the 13th: A New Beginning and Laurie Strode in Rob Zombie’s Halloween II a run for their money as the worst final girl ever. It took just one scene for me to come to this realization:
This is a minute-long scene in a 101-minute movie but it impacts the film in a big way. It shows just how much of a better character Helen (Sarah Michelle Gellar, flawless) is than Julie (Jennifer Love Hewitt). Helen is a character who, at this point in the film, has lost everything (her career, her friends, her future) and hides her torment behind a facade. This is the one moment in the film where she lets her wall down and opens up to her former best friend. Rather than reciprocate, Julie just shuts her down, seemingly closing out her best friend forever. It’s a real dick move and loses any sympathy viewers may have had for Julie up until that point.
Throughout the duration of I Know What You Did Last Summer, Julie is either pouting or whining or screaming. Her behavior is understandable in the beginning. She was forced into a pact of secrecy after her and her friends disposed of a body. She then spent her freshman year of college in a severe depression which impacted her social life and her grades. She cut off ties with everyone from her hometown, including her own mother. It’s an understandable reaction after such a traumatic event. However, her stubbornness to reconnect with her friends, or at least Helen, makes her unlikable to viewers and therefore an unsuccessful Final Girl.
The Final Girl, a coin termed by Carol Clover in her 1992 book Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film, should exhibit the following characteristics:
- She is typically sexually unavailable or virginal.
- She does not partake in drugs or other illegal activities.
- She will occasionally have a shared history with the killer.
- She is the “investigating consciousness” of the film, moving the narrative forward and, as such, she exhibits intelligence, curiosity, and vigilance.
Nowhere in Clover’s definition of a Final Girl does she say the Final Girl has to be likable, but that is usually a trait inherent of the title. Other than being virginal (she has sex with her boyfriend on the beach before they mow down Ben Willis), Julie epitomizes the Final Girl trope. Julie doesn’t do anything downright despicable in I Know What You Did Lat Summer, and screenwriter Kevin Williamson positions her as the obvious Final Girl in the first act when she is the only one of the main characters to object to disposing of Ben’s body. That is at least relatable, but once the film flashes forward a year she becomes the worst character in the film. She’s rude to her mother and she’s rude to her ex-boyfriend Ray (Freddie Prinze Jr.), but the final straw comes after the above conversation with Helen. By that point, all of the audience’s sympathy has moved over to Helen, which is why her epic chase scene is so effective. By the time she dies, you’re just left with Julie and Ray, arguably the two least interesting characters in the film. Does anyone particularly care if Julie makes it off of that boat alive? Not particularly.
That last statement is a bit of a stretch but brings me to my next point: Julie is absolutely helpless during the climactic boat scene.
Julie doesn’t do anything to help herself here. Rather than fight back, she runs the entire time, relying on her ex-boyfriend to save the day. It’s a bit anticlimactic that Julie isn’t the one to defeat Ben Willis (yet, as she will get her turn in the sequel). Robbing her of this victory and making her passive during the final battle also robs the audience of the chance to share in Julie’s catharsis. As a Final Girl, Julie is underwhelming, to say the least.
Is Julie James the worst Final Girl in horror history? Probably not. To make that statement I would have to have seen every horror movie ever made. And I do think that Pam from Friday the 13th: A New Beginning and Laurie in Zombie’s Halloween II are worse than her, but I finally understand why so many viewers loathe Julie James. It’s even worse when the character who should have lived (Helen) dies so early on. Helen is a much deeper and likable character. Julie is boring and useless. This is of course through no fault of Hewitt. The character is simply written that way. It’s not a bad thing that we care for Helen. On the contrary, it’s actually great and makes the film that much more effective. It just would have been better if Williamson had put as much effort into fleshing out Julie as he did with Helen.
What are your thoughts on the matter? Do you sympathize with Julie? Or do you find yourself wishing that Helen was the Final Girl instead? Let us know in the comments below!
Editorials
How ‘Weapons’, ‘Hokum’, and ‘Widow’s Bay’ Continue Stephen King’s Horror Legacy
After fifty years of continuous writing, Stephen King has become a genre unto himself.
The unrivaled Master of Horror made a splash in 1974 with his debut novel Carrie and has been terrifying readers ever since. Two years later, Brian De Palma brought this shocking story to the screen with an equally electrifying horror film that remains a genre classic and a prototypical example of “Good For Her” horror. This dual debut seemed to open the floodgates, unleashing endless waves of Stephen King films.
From the highs of Misery, Cujo, and The Shawshank Redemption to the schlocky fun of Cat’s Eye, Creepshow, and Children of the Corn, the last five decades have seen just about every notable horror creator take a stab at the author’s massive collection.
In recent years, this singular subgenre has begun to burst at the seams, expanding to include Stephen King-esque fare. In 2016, brothers Matt and Ross Duffer debuted Stranger Things, a sci-fi series heavily inspired by two of King’s most famous books. The Netflix series remixes Firestarter and It by following a little girl with psychic powers and an intrepid group of kids on bikes who must battle an otherworldly foe and a sinister government agency. With its clever blend of modern effects and comforting nostalgia, this gateway horror series paved the way for Andy Muschietti’s It adaptation which remains the highest grossing horror film of all time.
Four years later, Mike Flanagan would create Midnight Mass, a spiritual adaptation of King’s second novel Salem’s Lot. Published in 1975, the book sees a tiny New England town torn apart by a centuries-old vampire. Though Flanagan’s story is perhaps more tender, both iterations of the classic horror tale follow close-knit communities shaken to their core by the presence of an ancient evil.
In addition to these recent hits, 2025 was a banner year for the Master of Horror. Audiences delighted in six mainstream adaptations, including the massively popular It: Welcome to Derry which chronicles earlier cycles of the titular clown’s reign. With this boost to King’s cultural cache, it’s no surprise that we’ve begun to see more unofficial adaptations of the author’s work and horror creators who build their own unique castles in King’s creative sandbox.
So what defines a Stephen King-esque story?
For the past fifty years, the prolific author has dipped his toes in nearly every subgenre from supernatural stories and grisly gore to western fantasy and science fiction. Including his vast catalogue of short fiction, King has tackled ghosts, demons, werewolves, zombies, aliens, mutants, and self-driving cars, not to mention bizarre monsters of his own creation. But what truly unites this vast array of horror is King’s focus on relatable characters. In his 2000 memoir/instructional text On Writing, the prolific author describes the amusement he finds in writing disparate characters, placing them in horrific scenarios, then exploring the ways they try to survive.
An unofficial Stephen King adaptation may take place in the author’s native New England — bonus points if it’s set in Maine — and reference his well-known heroes and villains. But what makes the King connection unbreakable is a character-driven story about average people who band together in the face of abject terror.
Weapons Captures Small Town Stephen King

Following his 2022 shocker Barbarian, Zach Cregger returned with Weapons, a sprawling story that begins in a doomed elementary school. On an otherwise ordinary day, Justine (Julia Garner) arrives at her desk to find that all but one of her students have disappeared. As the mystery grows increasingly violent, Justine and Archer (Josh Brolin), the father of a missing boy, find their way to the home of Alex (Cary Christopher), the class’ only surviving student. In some ways reminiscent of Salem’s Lot, Weapons swings wildly through the unfortunate town, introducing us to its flawed inhabitants as we watch their lives fall apart.
Cregger’s setup nods to a pair of King short stories. Both “Suffer the Little Children” and “Here There Be Tygers” tackle monstrous presences in elementary schools, but as Weapons reaches its final act, Constant Readers may remember another Stephen King tale. Featured in his 1985 collection Skeleton Crew, “Gramma” introduces us to George, a little boy tormented by an aging witch. On an afternoon alone with his sickly grandmother, the frightened child gradually realizes that the imposing old woman has been waiting for an opportunity to cast a spell that will extend her own life by possessing his body.
Alex finds himself similarly tortured by his aunt Gladys (Amy Madigan), a garish witch who orchestrates a desperate plot to sustain her own strength. Transforming humans into mindless weapons, Gladys has taken over Alex’s family home and lured his classmates to the basement. Holding them in a comatose state, she syphons off their energy to extend her own supernatural life.
Vastly different in many ways, both “Gramma” and Weapons hinge on a sinister witch who uses horrific magical spells to sacrifice the bodies of her vulnerable prey.
Hokum Echoes The Shining and 1408

It’s nearly impossible to watch a film about a haunted hotel without thinking of King’s third novel, The Shining. This icy story follows Jack Torrance, an angry writer struggling with his sobriety and a shameful incident haunting his past. Accompanied by his wife and young son, Jack has taken a job as the winter caretaker for the Overlook, a haunted hotel situated high in the Rocky Mountains. Snowed in, Jack finds himself tormented by dangerous ghosts who amplify his greatest fears.
Damian McCarthy’s Hokum follows a similarly troubled figure. Ohm Bauman (Adam Scott) is a surly writer who travels to the Bilberry Woods Hotel in rural Ireland to spread his parents’ ashes. Haunted by his own tragic past, Ohm finds himself trapped in the honeymoon suite, a decaying room that’s been permanently closed to protect visitors from a dangerous witch trapped within its walls. Visual nods to King’s text abound with woodcut figurines and an animated clock, mirroring ominous descriptions found in King’s text.
Another terrifying sequence sees Ohm staring with horror at a closed door, the only thing separating him from the approaching witch. As the door knob slowly turns, Constant Readers remember Jack’s narrow escape from the ghostly woman in room 217. And Ohm’s popular Conquistador books directly reference King’s long-running fantasy series The Dark Tower which follows a gunslinger named Roland Deschain tasked with protecting the nexus of the universe.
In addition to these thematic comparisons, Hokum bears striking resemblance to King’s terrifying short story “1408.” Collected in 2002’s Everything’s Eventual, the terrifying story follows Mike Enslin, a dejected writer who’s risen to fame penning essays about his adventures in haunted locations. Mike arrives at the Hotel Dolphin and bullies his way into the titular room, despite the manager’s dire warnings. McCarthy nods to this story with an ominously misplaced hotel room door, reminiscent of King’s entry to 1408, an unsuspecting portal that appears to move each time Mike looks away.
However, McCarthy’s most direct reference lies in a minicorder Ohm uses to capture notes. Trapped inside the dreaded honeymoon suite, this device offers well-timed messages while sitting next to a decomposing corpse. Mike records his time in 1408 with his own trusty minicorder. Described for the reader, his tape has captured the man’s slow descent into madness as the room prepares to swallow him whole. With conclusions that differ wildly in tone, both Ohm and Mike find their lives irrevocably changed by encounters with the supernatural realm.
Widow’s Bay Builds Its Own Version of Castle Rock

Katie Dippold’s Widow’s Bay has taken the idea of an unofficial King adaptation and turned it into an art form. The Apple TV series sees the residents of the titular island plagued by a curse that dates back centuries. Not only does the picturesque hamlet not accommodate wifi connections, those born on the island face certain death should they ever try to leave. Desperate to modernize the tiny town, Mayor Tom Loftis (Matthew Rhys) draws in waves of tourists just as a new cycle of terror begins.
Blending horror with deft comedy, Dippold makes cheeky references to King’s body of work. Tom warns that, “there’s something in the fog,” reminding readers of King’s 1980 novella The Mist. And Loftis’ own stay in the town’s haunted hotel sees him tormented by the ghost of a murderous clown. We even spy a vintage King hardback peeking out of a local book trade box.
In many ways Widow’s Bay feels like a new iteration of the author’s Little Tall Island, a tiny village off the coast of Maine. In addition to the 1992 novel Dolores Claiborne and a handful of harrowing short stories, this quaint fishing village is also the setting for King’s 1999 teleplay Storm of the Century. Premiering on ABC primetime, this tragic tale follows a terrified group of islanders who batten down the hatches for a dangerous Nor’easter only to find a more sinister threat lurking within.
Constant Readers may also be reminded of Castle Rock, the author’s favorite fictional town.
First introduced in the 1981 novel Cujo, the charming village becomes the star of Needful Things, King’s satire about consumerism. After several Castle Rock stories, we’re reintroduced to its residents as they gossip about the arrival of Leland Gaunt and the grand opening of his curio shop. Anything their hearts desire can be found in his varied inventory, so long as they’re willing to pay the price. Pitting cantankerous neighbors against each other, Gaunt ignites a wave of grisly violence by exploiting long-held resentments and feuds.
The town’s only defense against this supernatural threat is beleaguered sheriff Alan Pangborn. Still grieving the deaths of his wife and younger son, Alan struggles to connect with his older child and pick up the pieces of his shattered life. Also a widower, Loftis struggles to raise his own restless son and explain the strange details of his wife’s tragic death. Attempting to unravel the island’s dark secrets, Tom is aided by quirky residents including a surly fisherman named Wyck (Stephen Root) and Patricia (Kate O’Flynn), an earnest Town Hall employee. King’s own novels feature many of these proactive alliances with disparate characters combining their strengths to overcome insurmountable odds.
With Widow’s Bay renewed for a second season and Mike Flanagan’s Carrie series on the horizon, the future seems bright for new King adaptations, both spiritual and directly pulled from his catalogue. The prolific author also shows no signs of slowing down with two publications nearing release. His upcoming novel, Other Worlds Than These, is the long-awaited third Talisman book which teases direct ties to his Dark Tower world. Holly Forever will be a new installment of his crime series, offering a different kind of genre fare.
This embarrassment of riches spawning multiple worlds seems ripe for spiritual adaptation and will likely inspire horror creators for decades to come.

Kate O’Flynn, Stephen Root and Matthew Rhys in “Widow’s Bay,” now streaming on Apple TV.
You must be logged in to post a comment.