Connect with us

Editorials

‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers’: A Retrospective

Published

on

Last week brought the announcement that Warner Bros. has launched a new remake of the sci-fi horror classic Invasion of the Body Snatchers, with The Conjuring 2 screenwriter David Leslie Johnson to pen the script and John Davis (Predator) to produce. Since this latest remake marks the fifth-time author Jack Finney’s 1955 iconic novel The Body Snatchers has been adapted for film, the news didn’t exactly drum up a lot of excitement.

The novel, originally released as a serialization on Colliers Magazine in 1954, was met with criticism and a lot of speculation as to the narrative’s symbolism. The now familiar story, then set in a California town, sees residents behaving strangely and void of emotion, leading to the discovery that giant pods from outer space have been replicating people’s bodies and memories while they sleep. As the residents succumb to the pod people, the human population dwindles until only the protagonist is left to warn the rest of the country.

While many interpreted the pod people as symbolism for McCarthyism at the time, Finney insisted there was nothing more intended beyond pure entertainment. Yet, whether intended or not, there’s a timeless terror to his story that allows for social subtext mirroring current events. The simple concept of erasing humanity remains terrifying no matter the era, and that it keeps resurfacing to terrorize new generations isn’t surprising. Perhaps what is surprising, though, is that for the most part, each adaptation of the novel has been worth watching. Even if the critics sometimes couldn’t see it.


Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)

Invasion of the Body Snatchers 1956

Unlike the novel, which saw the aliens leaving Earth after deciding they couldn’t handle man’s resistance in a tidy, happy ending, the first adaptation kicked off the trend of darker, more ambiguous endings. Initially, lead protagonist Dr. Miles Bennell was to end the film screaming as truckloads of pods passed him on the road, but an epilogue was added with Miles successfully alerting the FBI. The pods hadn’t exactly given up their fight, but at least humanity stood a chance with the added epilogue.

The critics ignored the film upon its release in 1956, but from a box office standpoint, it was a success, drawing in $2.5 million in its first year. Many theaters at the time displayed pods made of paper-mâché with cutouts of lead actors Kevin McCarthy and Dana Wynter running away, making me wish I could step back in time and experience movie-going then. As for the critics that snubbed the film, well, they eventually came around. The 1956 version was selected for preservation in the U.S. National Film Registry by the Library of Congress for being culturally significant. It continues to pop up on “best of” lists still today.


Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)

The most universally loved version of the story among both fans and critics alike, this remake set the standard for all remakes going forward. Moving the setting from a small town to a large city, this adaptation also brought in a bigger budget, an all-star cast lead by Donald Sutherland as protagonist Matthew Bennell, and included cameos from the original 1956 cast. The special effects were also dialed up to an impressive level, including a scene with a creepy dog with the man’s head. This time, the studio didn’t interfere with the pessimistic ending either. Though the film remained true to the source material, it introduced a new trait to the pod people: that eerie habit of pointing and screaming to put humans to surrounding pod people.

In a fun bit of trivia (spoilers to follow on the film’s ending), actress Veronica Cartwright was kept in the dark about the ending of the film by director Phil Kaufman. She had no idea that Donald Sutherland’s character had become an alien, and his pod person scream came as a shock. Cartwright’s terrified reaction isn’t acting. A year later, Ridley Scott pulled the same trick on her with the famous chestburster scene in Alien. Sometimes it’s rough being an actor.


Body Snatchers (1993)

This remake shifted the story from its California setting in favor of a military base in Alabama, making for an interesting parallel between the structural army and the conformity of the alien invasion. It kept the otherworldly scream of the pod people from the 1978 version but dropped the character of doctor Bennell that had appeared in the previous two iterations completely, instead focusing on lead Marti Malone (Gabrielle Anwar), the daughter of an Environmental Protection agent studying the effects of the military on the ecosystem.

This version also boasts a secret weapon in the form of Meg Tilly as Carol Malone, the first in the Malone household to succumb to the pods.  Her role is minor, but she delivers the most epic monologue that’s bone chilling. If you don’t remember much else about this version, you’ll be able to recall her words with clarity, “Where you gonna go, where you gonna run, where you gonna hide? Nowhere… ’cause there’s no one like you left.”

Of all the film adaptations of this story, this version proved to be critic Roger Ebert’s favorite. He boldly declared it superior to the 1978 version. Oddly, Warner Bros. released this version in only about a few dozen theaters, so its box office earnings were dismal compared to its predecessors. Which is unfortunate, because it’s a great film.


The Invasion (2007)

The Invasion 2007

The weakest link among the remakes, this iteration almost feels as hollow as a pod person itself. On paper, this should have worked. The source material remains timeless and scary, and the setting expands the invasion all over the U.S., instead of just one region, which means the invasion spreads even faster. A-list talent like Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig headlined, and in a nod to the 1978 film, actress Veronica Cartwright had a small role as the first to notice something is amiss.

Problems began to pile up behind the scenes, though. Between David Kajganich’s contemporary departures from the original novel and director Oliver Hirschbiegel’s more claustrophobic arthouse approach, this wasn’t turning out to be summer blockbuster that Warner Bros. had envisioned. Enter the Wachowskis (The Matrix) to rework the screenplay, rumored to have rewritten two-thirds of the final film, then Joel Silver’s close friend James McTeigue to direct reshoots, and Warner Bros. received their summer action film. Except, tension, claustrophobia, and character development got lost in the mix. Also, that the aliens spread their infection by way of projectile vomit remains in odd choice for this film.

It’s an ok film that kind of works for an alien-invasion thriller; it’s flawed but entertaining enough for a single viewing. There’s been a consistent level of quality, though, in the Invasion of the Body Snatcher remakes that this didn’t quite meet. So, I’m glad that this isn’t the last attempt, and that a new generation will get introduced to this story.

Which version is your favorite?

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading