Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Why ‘Life’ Felt More Like an ‘Alien’ Film than ‘Alien: Covenant’

Published

on

Let me get this out of the way before we go any further: I do not think Xenomorphs need a cinematic origin story. The fact they are presented as a mysterious species without any logical motivation in the original 1979 film Alien and its sequels make them some of the scariest monsters ever to grace the silver screen.

Xenomorphs aren’t out for world domination or eradication of a species because of some personal vendetta. They don’t have a political agenda or special interests. They don’t show favoritism or empathy.

They just are.

But here we sit, with not one, but two prequels brought to us by the man who directed the original science fiction horror masterpiece, Ridley Scott. While neither of them are godawful dumpster fires (I’m sure there will be some debate on that in the comments), I feel they both diminish the impact of one of cinema’s greatest interstellar menaces.

Luckily, I’m not here to dissect the merits and flaws of Prometheus and Alien: Covenant (a few forthcoming jabs notwithstanding). Instead, I want to show some love for a film that felt more in tune with the Alien franchise than the recent Scott efforts.

That movie is Daniel Espinosa’s Life.

Life SXSW Review

I’m sure many people saw the trailer for Life and had the same reaction as I had: “I liked this movie when it was called Alien.” But despite the film’s ostensible derivativeness, when I actually watched Life on home video, I discovered that what director Daniel Espinosa (Safe House) and writers Rhett Reese & Paul Wernick (Zombieland, Deadpool) had crafted was an extremely well-shot, fast-paced, horror film that could have easily been a prequel to Alien.

In fact, I’d argue it plays better in terms of tone and terror than the actual Alien prequels.

Hear me out…

Life is simple, and simple is not always a bad thing. The film depicts a group of fairly well-developed characters who are in space, just doing their jobs when they encounter a deadly lifeform that picks them off one by one; essentially the same set up as Alien and Aliens (and myriad other great sci-fi horror films).

In Life, there are no strange origins of humanity hidden in alien architecture or monsters being engineered by a completely different race of dangerous extraterrestrials. There are just people doing the best they can and getting torn apart because of it. In Life, the alien doesn’t have a reason for being, only a primal desire to consume. Rationale be damned.

Life relies on the same primal survival horror elements that Alien did while swapping the themes of the perversion of human reproduction and sexual repression with xenophobia and colonialism (which, given, Aliens tackled pretty hard already). But if the filmmakers were to slap a couple Weyland Corp. patches on Ryan Reynolds and Co., you’d have a functioning prequel that sticks to what made the original work without fully destroying the mystique built up around Xenomorphs.

Without getting into spoiler territory, the ambiguously bleak ending could perfectly lead into Alien. As far as timelines go, there is over a century between the films (or about 70 years if Prometheus is canonical in this hypothetical scenario), which is more than enough time for some shady Weyland Corp. shit to go down in order for the films to have connective tissue. Lots of science fiction franchises jump centuries to continue their stories including this one.

Life could fit in when it comes to the monster design as well. It’s unique enough to stand on its own or be a prototype of what the Xenomorphs could become (instead of a weird white cobra thingy). Even the origin of the lifeform in Life is theoretical. Sure it was found on Mars, but is it from Mars? Who knows? Should we care? My vote is “no.”

Just let the monster be a scary monster.

I know Life isn’t really an Alien movie (nor is it a Venom prequel…), but it sure does feel right at home in the Alien Universe. The chilling isolation is there; the cool creature design is there; characters that are relatable without a ten-minute exposition dump are there, and the sheer intensity of being confronted with humanity’s deepest fear of the unknown manifested as a devastating harbinger of horror is there.

If nothing else, Life is a tight science fiction horror film with a great cast, fantastic production design, a really cool monster, and the complete lack of scientists removing their helmet to expose themselves to the atmosphere of a planet they just fucking landed on.

That last one is a big plus for me. 

86 Comments

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading