Editorials
In Defense of ‘Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation’
This month marks the 23rd anniversary of the initial release of Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation. The movie hasn’t exactly been held in high regard by horror fans, and even was once shunned by the film’s stars, Renee Zellweger and Mathew McConaughey. While the movie is embroiled in a web of disgust, I feel a lot differently; I actually like Texas Chainsaw Massacre: Next Generation. I know—fuck me, right?
Now before you come at me with your fighting words in the comments section, here me out first. When Next Generation was released on home video, I was 12. My mind was still burgeoning and so was my love for the genre. I hadn’t even seen the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre yet, or even knew what it was. However, when I watched Next Generation, I was excited by the idea of an unfortunate prom night run-in with a crazed Texan family, and I wanted more.
I was immediately drawn to Jenny (Zellweger) because I identified with her. She was a totally shy, weirdo, but she was simultaneously likeable. Jenny may have been meek, but that didn’t stop her from expressing her opinion and standing up for herself. Plus, she turned out to be a lot stronger than the louder and more assertive characters in the film, and proved to be much braver.
Being a quiet, shy nerd that flew under the radar throughout my adolescence, I wanted to be like Jenny. Seeing her overcome so much, despite her insecurities, made me feel like maybe I could, too. And while I didn’t actually have to fight Leatherface, I did have to face the school cafeteria and social hierarchy—and at the time, that was much worse.
Zellweger’s performance sold the movie to 12-year-old me. I was absolutely terrified for her, and I wanted to see her succeed so badly. Then, a mesmerizing man named Vilmer (McCaughney) showed up on the screen, and everything I knew was flipped upside down.

I sensed that Vilmer was a bad person, but McCaughney’s presence was so undeniably charming that I couldn’t help but like him. My feelings changed as the film progressed and Vilmer displayed just how sadistic he truly was, and that’s all thanks to the laudable performance McCaughney gave.
One of the memorable moments in the film is when Vilmer has Jenny and her friends in the kitchen. It’s obviously a throwback to the infamous dinner table scene in the original, but with a lot more head-squashing. I remember being disturbed by Vilmer’s dead stare as he stomps on Heather’s head, squishing it like a grape, and then having absolutely no idea what was going on with his leg afterward. It was bizarre, and it created a warped atmosphere that left me feeling uneasy.
I felt similar when I found out that Darla—the woman from the real estate office—wasn’t as nice a person as she presented herself. Initially, I loved Darla. I thought she was this super cool lady who was really helpful to the kids, and then—BAM! She reveals that Vilmer is her boyfriend. I got schooled on the ol’ befriending the enemy trope, and I loved it.
You see, Next Generation was a learning experience for pre-teen Amanda. I had been a fan of horror movies growing up, but my obsession wasn’t fully alive yet, especially at that age. I was still coming into my own and figuring out what I liked, and this movie was like a fun re-introduction to the genre.
When I finished Next Generation and my father told me about the original—and the “true story” it was based on—I was pumped. I imagined that my prom night would consist of a chainsaw-wielding maniac in the middle of the woods too! So, I sought out the original film and when I watched it, I felt so uncomfortable and dirty. It was a different feeling than the one I got from Next Generation, and I loved it.
Now, Next Generation is in nowhere near as good as the original The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, but it did its job. It made me want more of the crazy family and pushed me to want to watch the original film, its sequel, and the third movie. Zellweger and McCaughney captured my young, black heart and steered me on the right path to more horror.
So, the next time you shit on a movie—whether it be a remake or original concept—remember that there are people out there who are just getting into the horror genre. While a movie might not live up to your seasoned opinion, it could very well be unleashing a whole new world of horror fun on an impressionable young mind. And there’s nothing better than that.
Editorials
‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements
The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.
However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.
That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.
A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.
At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.
The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.
In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.
Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.
The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.
In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.
The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.
Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.
Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.
Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.
Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.

You must be logged in to post a comment.