Connect with us

Editorials

Ranking the Returning Horror Icons of 2017

Published

on

*Keep up with our ongoing end of the year coverage here*


This year has been tremendous for horror, from massive box office wins to surprise creative successes. 2017 has also brought a surprising number of returning horror icons, some reviving long-dormant franchises while others sought to answer criticisms on more recent entries. The resurgence of horror icons looks to continue into 2018, too, with new appearances by icons like the Predator and the Boogeyman himself, Michael Myers.

With the year winding to a close, let’s rank the returning horror icons and their films of 2017:


7. Leatherface

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchise has had a rather uneven run, especially when it comes to continuity. Yet when Alexandre Bustillo and Julien Maury were tapped to helm an origin story, the minds behind 2007’s modern classic Inside, it was enough to give fans hope that this was going to be something special. Or at the very least extremely tense and gory. I suppose on that front it succeeds in its revelry for violence, but it also somehow manages to be pretty dull, at least for the long stretch of the running time. The beginning and the end of Leatherface’s origin story are the most interesting, but somehow the character is relegated to a supporting role in his own film during the sagging middle. That’s because, inexplicably, the narrative wants to play a “guess which messed up kid is actually going to be Leatherface” type of game. Bustillo and Maury wholly deliver on what they were hired to do, in terms of gruesome sequences, but I can’t help but wonder what Leatherface’s origin story would be like had they gotten to write the script as well.


6. Alien: Covenant

The lack of xenomorphs in Prometheus was a common complaint, among many other flaws, so Ridley Scott continued with the plot threads he was most interested in while giving fans what we thought we wanted; a lot more xenomorph (and neomorph) action. The trailers looked fantastic, giving glimpses of back bursting aliens and Katherine Waterston as a potential new character on par with Ripley. What we got, though, were two different movies crammed into one. One film continued the themes of creation that Scott began exploring in Prometheus, which proved to be the most interesting aspect of the film largely thanks to Michael Fassbender’s performances as androids Walter and David. The other film, though, was a rehash of previous Alien films involving an ill-fated crew that, for the most part, didn’t even get proper introductions before being dispatched by new iterations of the xenomorph. On a visual level, Covenant is fantastic. The gore was top notch, as was anything related to Fassbender’s David playing god with the xenomorphs. The introduction to neomorphs and back bursting aliens was fantastic. Anything related to the Covenant crew, however, added a lot of dead weight. I cared about the crews of the USCSS Nostromo and USS Sulaco. I didn’t even know who most of the crew was in Covenant, even when they were dying.


5. Jigsaw

Reviving the Saw franchise after seven years of lying dormant brought a ton of excitement for the potential; if the studio is bringing the series back after its conclusion, there must be a compelling reason, right? Eh, not so much. Our own Trace reviewed it, stating, “Jigsaw is a competently made film, but it does feel a bit passionless.” It summed up the overall mixed reception to Jigsaw’s return. While imperfect, I felt like Jigsaw succeeded in its goal. I can’t say that it reinvented the wheel, nor did it offer much in the way of the series’ trademark twists, but boy did it entertain. I had a blast with Jigsaw. The kills were inventive, and the victims didn’t grate on me like they have in the past few installments. Best of all? No Mark Hoffman! That was a character that had long overstayed his welcome, so I was happy with a fresh batch of players in the Jigsaw’s twisted games. It’s always a welcome sight to see Billy the Puppet on the big screen, too, even if the latest entry didn’t reinvent the wheel.


4. Victor Crowley

One of the things that I love about Adam Green’s Hatchet trilogy, aside from the retro slasher vibe and glorious gore, is that overall it feels like one big story instead of three films in a franchise. Each one escalates the battle between Marybeth Dunstan and Victor Crowley in proper measure, from the tourists of the first film to the search and recovery team of the third film. The trilogy was given a proper send off, but that didn’t lessen the fans’ desire for more. Adam Green pulled a fast one, though, when he revealed a sneaky sequel in lieu of the original Hatchet set to screen on its 10th year anniversary. Set 10 years after the events of the first film and following survivor Andrew (played by series mainstay Parry Shen), Victor Crowley is mistakenly resurrected to begin his terror anew. Which is all you need to know going in. Except of course, everything you loved about the franchise isn’t diminished in any way. All of the gore and humor you could want, with some well-earned fan surprises in the mix. That’s a tough accomplishment, if you ask me.


3. Annabelle: Creation

This modern, recent addition to the horror icons stole our horror loving hearts with her chilling introduction in James Wan’s The Conjuring. So much so that she got her own spinoff in 2014, though it didn’t hold a candle to her previous film appearance. It performed well at the box office, and audiences were receptive enough to her standalone film that it warranted a sequel. Or rather, a prequel. New Line Cinema and James Wan tapped David F. Sandberg to helm the film after his work on Lights Out, and the result was something much more at home in The Conjuring universe. Sandberg drew inspiration not only from Wan’s work, but classics like The Haunting or the score of The Shining to craft a creepy prequel that nails its scares. Sandberg softened Annabelle’s look, attempting to make her look more like something a child would actually play with. I can’t say he was entirely successful, because she was still pretty terrifying. Not only did Annabelle’s second standalone appearance work well on her own merit, the film also nicely sets up the upcoming spinoff The Nun, boosting Annabelle: Creation’s ranking.


2. Cult of Chucky

Cult of Chucky Chucky Brigade

After the comedic tone of Seed of Chucky, the series went back to its straight horror roots with Curse of Chucky. It worked. Between the new look for Brad Dourif’s serial killing doll Chucky, new characters, and toning down the comedy to let scares take the spotlight, Don Mancini re-ignited the franchise in the best possible way. Which made the direct follow up to Curse of Chucky highly anticipated. Leave it to Mancini to continue the battle between Nica (played by the fantastic Fiona Dourif) and Chucky in the most unexpected of ways. Those expecting something more in the vein of Curse of Chucky might be disappointed, but long-time fans found themselves with a sequel offering huge ideas and memorably iconic moments. Cult of Chucky earns high marks for its bold new direction and originality, bringing Alex Vincent and Jennifer Tilly back into the fold, and the utterly fantastic scene featuring three Chucky dolls. The war between good versus evil seemed impossibly uneven by the time the credits rolled, so huge thank you to Mancini for that pleasant surprise during the end credit scene.


1. IT

It says a lot about Stephen King’s source material as well as Tim Curry’s performance in the 1990 made for television adaptation that Pennywise became such an instant icon that resonated with fans. Curry’s version of the coulrophobic inducing entity that terrorized the Losers Club was so iconic that fans were instantly apprehensive of anyone else stepping into the role. Instead of using Curry’s performance as a guide, though, Bill Skarsgard and the creators behind the new adaptation smartly took it in a completely different direction. New look, new personality and mannerisms, but same terrifying evil at its core. Thanks to Skarsgard’s performance as Pennywise the dancing clown, both versions of the character stand out on their own. That weird eye thing that Pennywise does in the movie, making him even more unsettling? That’s all Skarsgard, utilizing his lazy eye to enhance the strangeness of Pennywise. Even cooler is that Skarsgard’s version has instilled a fear of clowns in a whole new generation. Andy Muschietti’s IT works for so many reasons, but in terms of returning horror icons Pennywise stole the year.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading