Connect with us

Editorials

The Best Horror Movies of All Time – The 1960s

Published

on

Best Horror Movies of All Time – 1970s / 1980s / 1990s / 2000s / 2010s

If you followed along with our Best Horror Movies of All Time series by decade, there was an absent decade; the 1960s. But, as the formative bridge between the atomic horror of the 1950s and the new wave of horror in the 1970s, the 1960s deserve inclusion too.

The rubber-suited monsters of the previous decade gave way to more psychological rooted fears in line with the social climate nurtured by the Vietnam war, the Kennedy administration, the Manson murders, and a loosening film censorship that allowed more freedom in expression of sex and violence. The 1960s also began with a bang, marking the final and arguably most influential decade of Alfred Hitchcock’s career in film and horror with the release of Psycho.

Here’s the best horror the decade had to offer.


Psycho (1960)

Hitchcock’s most accessible horror film set the foundation for slashers that would follow years later. Based on Robert Bloch’s novel of the same name, which was loosely based on serial killer Ed Gein, Psycho was a gamechanger in that its killer was the boy next door type, someone that fit right in among neighbors. It was also shocking in that lead character Marion Crane didn’t even survive past the first third of the film. Her iconic death scene was a true technical marvel, too, shot over six days with 77 different camera angles. Psycho was also transgressive for its depiction of sexuality and violence for its time, paving the way for films that would follow.


Peeping Tom (1960)

A film so effectively scary that it was pulled from theaters and seriously damaged the career of director Michael Powell, Peeping Tom is also considered the first slasher. Powell forced viewers to be complicit voyeurs with his serial killer, who murders women while using a camera to record their dying expressions. Though there are numerous comparisons to be made with Psycho, Peeping Tom bears more in common with typical slashers, namely in terms of the quantity of victims and the sympathetic final girl. Though critics and audiences hated it at the time, it’s since become regarded as a classic.


Eyes Without a Face (1960)

Giving more credence to the theory that documentary filmmakers make for excellent horror movie directors, Georges Franju’s segue into narrative features also brought about his determination to have genre film be taken seriously in native France. His first, adapted from a novel by Jean Redon, minimized the gore and animal cruelty from the novel that would upset censors, instead focusing on a quieter mood. The plot, which follows a surgeon who abducts women to flay their skin in the hopes of giving his disfigured daughter a new face, meant that even with the quieter tone, it still managed to cause controversy over the heterografting scene. Edith Scob gave a tremendous performance as Christiane, the daughter who spends most of the film emoting behind a mask. Like most now regarded classics, Eyes Without a Face has since been re-evaluated as a classic.


Black Sunday (1960)

Working as a cinematographer long before transitioning into the director’s seat, there’s no question that Mario Bava has a stunning eye for visual horror. Such is the case with gothic horror Black Sunday, his directorial debut of striking gothic imagery and a graphic tale of a witch’s revenge. Beautiful as it is horrific, it was banned in the UK for 8 years due to its violence and gruesome nature. Even with censorship issues, it didn’t stop the film from becoming a worldwide critical and box office hit, launching both Bava’s and lead star Barbara Steele’s careers. Shot in black and white, Bava would prove what he could do with vivid color just a few years later.


The Innocents (1961)

Best Horror Films

Like a classic supernatural horror film that would follow two years later, Jack Clayton’s supernatural horror keeps things ambiguous as to whether the ghosts are real or a mere manifestation of a mind that’s lost its innocence. The plot follows a governess who comes to believe that their large estate is inhabited by ghosts that are possessing the two children in her care. A tale of repressed sexuality made nightmarish by Clayton’s choice to film in black and white, and his choice to keep the film’s ghosts mostly relegated to the dark shadows in the background. Atmospheric with an eerie score, well-executed scares, and a screenplay co-penned by famous writer Truman Capote makes The Innocents an important pillar in supernatural horror.


Blood Feast (1963)

Okay, I know what you’re saying. Herschell Gordon Lewis’ first genre film doesn’t exactly hold up well in terms of plot, acting, and dialogue. And compared to the widely acclaimed films on this list, Blood Feast seems like the oddball. However, Lewis broke into new territory, creating the first ever Splatter film in Blood Feast. He also vastly improved as his work progressed on the sub-genre he created, with much better and gorier films to follow.


The Haunting (1963)

Best Horror Films

Adapted from Shirley Jackson’s novel The Haunting of Hill House, director Robert Wise and screenwriter Nelson Gidding took the base supernatural haunting and translated it into a psychoanalysis of character Eleanor Vance in the throes of a nervous breakdown. A rare Hollywood film to depict a feminine lesbian character, though Wise kept Theodora’s sexuality subtle. Favoring mood and atmosphere over overt signs of the supernatural, the film is now widely considered to be one of the most unsettling. Though just an average success upon release, The Haunting was a formative horror film among the likes of Steven Spielberg, and has since become a major cult hit.


Blood and Black Lace (1964)

Considered to be the earliest and most influential of gialli films, Mario Bava forever changed Italian horror with his highly stylized slasher with brutal kills. Already a master of horror, thanks to the successes of Black Sunday and Black Sabbath, Bava was given full creative reign over this film. This meant Bava unleashed; delivering a hyper-gory murder mystery that became the most influential thriller ever made. Bright colors, endless gore, and the giallo killer trademark outfit: black gloves, black hat, and a black trench coat. Complete with switchblades. This film would inspire the works of Dario Argento, Martin Scorsese, Quentin Tarantino, and more.


Night of the Living Dead (1968)

Best Horror Movies

Not much is left to be said about this seminal film by George A. Romero, the man responsible for the modern-day zombie sub-genre. A film shot among a group of friends on a miniscule budget that wound up portraying progressive themes of prejudice and xenophobia also terrified with its ghouls and gore. As groundbreaking as it was horrifying, Night of the Living Dead created one of the longest lasting legacies in horror. We’ll miss you forever, Mr. Romero.


Rosemary’s Baby (1968)

Horror director William Castle, known for creating theatrical gimmicks around his films, purchased the rights to Ira Levin’s 1967 novel with the hopes of being taken more seriously as a director. Instead, the studio pushed him into a producer role, opting for newcomer Roman Polanski to helm the adaptation. The result is one of the best horror movies of all time. Mia Farrow gives an all-time best performance as Rosemary Woodhouse, the poor housewife unwittingly raped and impregnated by the Devil himself thanks to a selfish, ambitious husband. The psychological horror that ensues, spiraling into full-blown paranoia, remains timeless.


Witchfinder General (1968)

A bleak, mean horror film about a 17th-century witchhunter who travels from town to town, condemning accused witches to death and leaving a wake of pain and sorrow. When he victimizes a young woman betrothed to a young soldier, he finds himself in a world of more trouble than he ever anticipated. The 75th role of iconic actor Vincent Price marked a far more serious performance than normal; his Witchfinder General Matthew Hopkins is one of horror’s most vicious monsters of all time. That he was so convincingly evil likely had a lot to do with his turmoil behind the scenes with director Matthew Reeves, who hated the actor for being pushed upon him by the studios and often lashed out at Price during filming. Their tumultuous working relationship made for an effective film; Witchfinder General is harrowing, vicious, and sadly remains timely. It’s not an easy watch, but it’s among the best.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading