Editorials
Rob Zombie’s ‘House of 1000 Corpses’ Turns 15!
One month ago, Rob Zombie began filming the highly anticipated follow up to The Devil’s Rejects, 3 From Hell. It’s news that feels even more timely considering 2018 marks the 15th anniversary of Zombie’s feature debut and first introduction to the Firefly family, House of 1000 Corpses. A nihilistic, gonzo horror film full of homages and numerous genres while still retaining a distinct style that’s pure Zombie, House of 1000 Corpses offended critics and lodged its way into the hearts of horror fans on April 11, 2003.
Though the film saw theatrical release in 2003, production ended in 2000. The film sat on the shelf for three years once Universal Pictures refused to release the film out of fear it would receive an NC-17 rating. Zombie eventually purchased the rights to the film himself, made a deal with MGM, and then finally Lionsgate acquired it once MGM got cold feet as well. Trimmed down to an R-rating, Lionsgate released the film, quickly made back their investment and then approached Zombie for sequel plans. Despite the uncertainty around the film’s release, that three-year delay actually worked in its favor. When production ended in 2000, violence in media was under scrutiny by Congress after the Columbine High School shooting that took place on April 20, 1999. Many major studios were pulled in to testify in front of Congress about marketing violent movies to children, which included Universal Pictures’ chairman at the time, Stacey Snider. The political climate around media during that period might have meant a very buried release for Zombie’s debut had Snider pushed forward with release, with the likely outcome that we never would’ve gotten The Devil’s Rejects.
The initial partnership between Zombie and Universal Pictures stemmed from Universal wanting a haunted house designed by Zombie for Halloween Horror Nights. While designing the haunt, the concept evolved into the basis for the film. It was a huge success for the theme park event, triggering Universal’s desire to keep their relationship going. They quickly greenlit the project, and Zombie warned them time and time again how extreme he intended to take it. Their abandonment of the project was ultimately their loss.

Following a similar trajectory to the gritty horror of the ‘70s that influenced House of 1000 Corpses, the theatrical release was instantly reviled. A gory, brutal sort of slasher in the vein of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 with Manson family leanings, the narrative centered around a sadistic backwoods Texas family torturing an unwitting group of travelers that cross their paths on Halloween night. That family, the Firefly family, were as colorful in personality as the beautiful neon glow that washed over many of the scenes. That many were named after characters in the Marx Brothers comedy films is indicative of the campy roots behind Zombie’s serial killing clan. Captain Spaulding (Sid Haig) from Animal Crackers, Rufus T. Firefly (Robert Allen Mukes) from Duck Soup, Otis (Bill Moseley) from A Night at the Opera, and “Baby” Vera-Ellen (Sheri Moon Zombie) possibly named after the actress who played Maggie in Love Happy.
Zombie’s reverence for film wasn’t just limited to the comedic origins of the characters’ names or in the ‘70s horror that played influence narratively. Even Zombie’s love of Westerns would find its way into House of 1000 Corpses, particularly in Spaulding’s consistent references to John Wayne. There’s a clip of 1932’s The Old Dark House featured in the film, and Baby Firefly also exhibits cinephile tendencies with her odd vaudeville performance and sharing her favorite actress is Bette Davis.
Zombie’s mishmash of cinematic inspirations and the film’s dark house conception were matched in style. The gritty handheld footage of Firefly clan inflicted torture against the pristine neon haze of Spaulding’s dark ride and Dr. Satan’s underground layer is just as manic as the Firefly family themselves. Tonally dark and gory as it is dementedly funny, a late supernatural twist by way of Dr. Satan keeps the entire story off kilter. That Zombie in actually shot dual versions of the film, one far gorier than the other, only furthered the eclectic aesthetic.
House of 1000 Corpses was a bold debut with a distinct style comprised of so many cinematic influences. It wasn’t a flawless film, but it was one steeped in passion and love of cinema. The uneven bits were smoothed over and tethered together by the tremendous performances of its cast. Sig Haig made Spaulding instantly iconic. Bill Moseley made Otis memorably terrifying. Matthew McGrory injected an enormous amount of sympathy toward the Firefly family as quiet yet imposing Tiny. Dennis Fimple gave an energetic, rousing performance as Grandpa Hugo, even when he was very ill and dying of heart disease.

In 2005, the Firefly family would tone down their theatrics for a much grittier grindhouse journey that further embedded themselves into horror fandom, earning a much stronger reception than its predecessor. Even still, House of 1000 Corpses is a bold declaration in horror even 15 years later. As unrelenting and dark as it is twisted and humorous, there’s nothing else like it.
Editorials
Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel
The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.
That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.
It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.
That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.
The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’
For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.
This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.
This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.
Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.
So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.
The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.
Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.
While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.
At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.
After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.
You must be logged in to post a comment.