“You Can Do This On a Human Being?” – Jack Pierce, the Forgotten Monster Makeup Pioneer
-
‘Play Dead’ – Watch the Official ‘Dead by Daylight’ Music Video from Ice Nine Kills!
-
‘Los Vampires’ Trailer Gives Deadly Twist on the Production of 1931’s Spanish ‘Dracula’ [Fantasia 2026]
-
‘Halloween Store’ Official Trailer – A Masked Slasher Stalks Inside a Knockoff Spirit Halloween
-
‘Pinocchio Unstrung’ Clip Introduces Robert Englund as a New Kind of Horror Villain
In October 1966, a bed-ridden Jack Pierce gave one of his final interviews to Russ Jones for Monster Mania #1. Jones asked a number of rudimentary questions the magazine assumed fans would be most interested in, particularly Pierce’s time working for Universal Pictures. The famously waspish make-up artist was courteous in his responses, albeit without revealing too much beyond the ostensible replies; until Jones asked whether it was difficult working with Lon Chaney Jr. Pierce paused for a moment, before responding: “Yes and no. That’s all I can say.”
Janus Piccuola was born in Porto Heli, Greece, on May 5th, 1889, emigrating to the United States with his family in his teens and landing in Chicago, where he decided he’d like to try for a career as a professional baseball player. After making some headway in the semi-pro leagues, Piccuola travelled west, arriving in Los Angeles to try out as a professional, only to be met with the damning and final verdict that he was too short to make it as a pro.
Hurt by the rejection, Piccuola nevertheless set out to find employment elsewhere, meeting his future wife Blanche Craven and changing his name to Jack Pierce, a decision that would essentially ostracize Pierce from his family. At the time, the fledgling motion picture industry was in its early ascent and Pierce took a number of jobs, first as a theatre projectionist, then theatre-chain manager before ‘moving inside’ and trying his hand at a number of technical tasks behind the scenes, including stuntman, camera loader, assistant director, and bit-part actor.
It was during a stint working as an actor that Pierce decided the best way to guarantee regular work would be to create his own makeup, thereby ensuring he’d be able to play any character that a movie might call for. Fully aware that he lacked both aesthetic presence and stature of a matinee idol, Pierce looked to other actors who’d made a career of physical transformation for film roles. Lon Chaney at the time was fast becoming a household name as a master of makeup. The future ‘Man of a Thousand Faces’, along with Jack Dawn, who would eventually find fame as the makeup artist on The Wizard of Oz, inspired Pierce to develop his own skills while employed as a jobbing actor for Universal, Lasky’s Famous Players and Vitagraph.
In 1926, Fox Pictures went into production on the film The Monkey Talks, starring Jacques Lerner as a man who impersonates a primate. By this time, even though Pierce was still employed first-and-foremost as a camera man or assistant director, his skills as a makeup artist were well-known. With director Raoul Walsh struggling with the right look for the monkey effect, Pierce stepped in to help out, creating a simian-human makeup for star Jacques Lerner so richly detailed that it caught the attention of Carl Laemmle, the head of Universal Pictures.
Hiring Pierce on a full-time basis, Laemmle immediately set his new makeup artist to work on Universal’s next Lon Chaney vehicle, The Man Who Laughs, a Hollywood adaptation of the Victor Hugo novel which told the story of Gwynplain, the son of Lord put to death as a political enemy of King James II. As further punishment, Gwynplain’s face is carved into a permanent, wicked grin.
When Chaney vacated the role, the German actor Conrad Veidt stepped in, working closely with Pierce as the makeup artist formulated Gwynplain’s hideous grinning countenance. The achieved look undoubtedly caught the eye of Bob Kane who took the maniacal expression wholesale and applied it to the creation of comic supervillain The Joker, arch-nemesis of Batman.
With the advent of the first talking pictures, Veidt, concerned that his German accent would not play well in the new wave of Hollywood films, returned to his native country. In hindsight, it’s possible to posit that his work with Pierce could and perhaps should have continued in a series of horror films under the auspices of Carl Laemmle Jr. Pierce, however, continued in his new role, applying makeup on several films for Universal, though none were stretching him as an artist. Nonetheless, his expertise and meticulous application of makeup led to Pierce’s promotion to Universal’s head of makeup.
When Universal acquired the rights to Bram Stoker’s Dracula, young Laemmle Jr. sought out not Bela Lugosi, who’d recently achieved fame in the Broadway hit version, but a number up-and-coming stars including Paul Muni and John Wray, who’d previously starred in Universal’s smash All Quiet on the Western Front. Lugosi, desperate to play Dracula on film, lobbied hard for the role and was eventually cast, albeit for a fraction of the cost of more established stars.
As a stage actor, Lugosi had no interest in any makeup artist wishing to meddle with a character’s look that he felt he’d made his own, and so Pierce was reduced to styling the supporting characters. Despite Lugosi’s insistence on applying his own makeup, Pierce was able to create the green greasepaint for Count Dracula, and probably the black widow’s peak that would become synonymous with the character.
Dracula was an enormous success, and Universal immediately cast the net wide in search of further classic literature properties they could utilize for their burgeoning horror series. Securing the rights to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Universal immediately cast Bela Lugosi in the titular role, with Robert Florey in the director’s chair. However, test footage proved unsuccessful and with Florey’s screenplay portraying the Monster as a mute killing machine, Lugosi was said to have raged: “I was a star in my country and I will not be a scarecrow over here!” With the film in tatters, both director and star moved on to Murders in the Rue Morgue.
Meanwhile, James Whale, fresh from critical and commercial success as director of Waterloo Bridge, was offered a choice of projects by Laemmle Jr. He chose Frankenstein, since it was the only property that remotely interested him. He cast unknown journeyman actor, Boris Karloff, as the Monster. The film would mark Jack Pierce’s arrival as a makeup artist of true merit.
Following six months of research, Pierce put together a clay model to show Laemmle Jr. before commencing tests with Karloff: “It was a lot of hard work, trying to find ways and means, what can you do? Frankenstein wasn’t a doctor; he was a scientist, so he had to take the head and open it, and he took wires to rivet the head. I had to add the electrical outlets to connect electricity in here on the neck. I made it out of clay and put hair on it and took it in to Junior Laemmle’s office. He said, ‘you mean you can do this on a human being?’ I said, ‘positively’. He said, ‘all right we will go to the limit.’
Working for weeks with Karloff, Pierce created everything from scratch. A wig was made with a cotton roll on top, ‘to get the flatness and the circle that protrudes from the head’. The high forehead was built using cotton and collodion, while the heavy eyelid effect was the result of a putty specially designed by Pierce, who then applied a sky grey makeup he’d developed via the Max Factor Foundation. Pierce rounded out the look with black lipstick for a cadaverous appearance and the application of electrodes to the actor’s neck, the removal of which left scars that remained with Karloff for the rest of his life.
Pierce dressed the actor in black, and manipulated the clothing to give the impression that the Monster was eight feet tall; cutting the coat down so that Karloff’s arms looked longer than they actually were. He then padded out his shoes to add height. Years later, Pierce would remark: “I didn’t really teach him how to walk. Boris and I would talk, but the man is so wonderful, I think the greatest of them all as far as playing these parts.” The pièce de résistance, as far as the iconic look of the Monster is concerned, came at Pierce’s request; asking Karloff to remove a dental plate to create a gaunt, deathly visage.
Production of Frankenstein became a Herculean task for both Karloff and Pierce as, each day, Pierce would start from scratch, recreating the entire makeup effect. This would take several hours as he painstakingly reapplied makeup to Karloff’s face: then, following a full-day’s shooting, Karloff would be required to sit while Pierce began the lengthy removal procedure. On occasion this would test the patience of even the affable actor, who would head home in full makeup, spending an uncomfortable night sleeping with his head between two books and trying to ensure he didn’t roll onto his face. In the morning, Pierce would attempt to piece together what was left of the Monster makeup, but even this would take hours as he toiled to repair the damage.
Frankenstein opened in late-November 1931 to widespread critical and commercial acclaim, catapulting Boris Karloff to ‘instant’ stardom. However, despite a number of notices regarding the makeup, the name Jack Pierce remained in the shadows. The New Yorker’s review went so far as to address the Monster’s appearance, enthusing that ‘the makeup department has a triumph to its credit in the monster and there lie the thrills of the picture’. Unfortunately, there was no name to hand any plaudits to. Despite the Art Director, Recording Supervisor, even Scenario editor receiving a credit in the opening titles of Frankenstein, Jack Pierce remained a silent, unknown and, crucially, uncredited entity in Universal’s cycle of horror films.
___________________________________________________________________
In 1922, the English Archaeologist, Howard Carter, discovered the tomb of Tutankhamun in the Valley of the Kings in Egypt. Within a decade of the opening of the tomb, the deaths of ten people were directly or indirectly attributed to the mysterious ‘Curse of the Pharaohs’. The story was of particular interest to Carl Laemlle Jr., who subsequently commissioned screenwriter Richard Schayer to seek a novel and obtain the rights with a view to making a related horror film. When Schayer returned empty handed, Laemmle Jr. instructed the screenwriter to work on a story idea that could be turned into a script. Schayer set to work with writer Nina Wilcox Putnam and together they produced a treatment entitled Cagliostro. Suitably impressed, Laemmle employed John L. Balderston, who’d written the Bela Lugosi-starring stage play of Dracula and, more importantly had covered the opening of Tutankhamum’s tomb for New York World, to write a script, which he titled, The Mummy.
Once again, Jack Pierce, in his role as head of the makeup department, began preparations in earnest. By now Pierce was earning a reputation for having something of a short-fuse. He found the complaints of actors regarding his meticulous methods jarring and would respond to their sighs and mutterings in no uncertain terms. In Boris Karloff, however, Pierce discovered both a gentleman and a willing participant. It was just as well, too, for Pierce’s makeup procedure for The Mummy far outdid Frankenstein’s in terms of the sheer scale.
“The complete makeup, from the top of the head to the bottom of his feet took eight hours,” said Pierce. Starting with the bandages, which had to be secured with tape, Pierce then added a further set of bandages treated with acid and burned in an oven, and finished the costume with clay. The whole procedure was designed to give the effect of the bandages breaking and dust falling off as the mummified creature steps out of the sarcophagus. Despite the arduous process, this incarnation of the creature Im-Ho-Tep only appeared on screen in the opening moments of The Mummy.
Both Karloff and Pierce endured a simpler process for Im-Ho-Tep’s alter-ego, Ardath Bey. Utilizing a mixture of cotton, collodion and a sedimentary clay called Fuller’s earth, which wrinkled as it dried, Pierce applied the mixture to Karloff’s face to give the impression of a man many years older. In a rare moment of recognition, Pierce was subsequently awarded a Hollywood Filmograph for his makeup design an application.
Over the course of the decade, Jack Pierce continued to work on Universal’s burgeoning horror empire, often collaborating with his friend Boris Karloff in such notable fare as The Old Dark House, The Black Cat, The Night Key and Bride of Frankenstein, the latter famous for Pierce and director James Whale’s collaboration on the Bride’s iconic Marcel-wave hairstyle, based on Egyptian queen, Nefertiti.
Pierce prided himself on never using masks or appliances to accentuate his makeup creations, preferring instead to apply makeup in layers to build up the required look. He did however, acquiesce to the requirement for an appliance while creating the monstrous, hirsute look of The Wolf Man. Fortunately, in this case, he’d already run the hard yards in preparation for George Waggner’s werewolf tale, having originally conceiving the design for the abandoned film The Wolfman in 1932.
Three years later he was required to design a different version of the wolf makeup for Henry Hull in Werewolf of London. Hull, concerned that he wouldn’t be recognizable to the other characters – as opposed to the rather more apocryphal versions of the story that tell of Hull being unwilling to submit to hours in the makeup chair, or not wishing to obscure his face through sheer vanity – insisted upon a scaled-down version of Pierce’s original design.
For The Wolf Man, Lon Chaney Jr. took the role of Lawrence Talbot, a man cursed to lycanthropy, and Pierce set to work on transforming the tall, imposing Chaney Jr. into a werewolf. Applying row-upon-row of yak hair, Pierce then singed and burned it to create the look of, “an animal that’s been out in the woods.” In his only concession to rubber prosthetics, Pierce would also attach a moulded nose, explaining that it was either that or he would need to “model the nose every day, which would have taken too long.” As it was, the entire process took several hours to apply, which Pierce painstakingly began from scratch every single day.
While Pierce’s relationship with Boris Karloff was cordial, even friendly, Lon Chaney Jr. was a rather less genial character and the two reportedly clashed often, with Chaney Jr. complaining that Pierce would intentionally burn him with the curling iron used to singe the yak hair on his face. On one occasion, the two allegedly almost came to blows. Nonetheless, they continued to work together on a number of Universal films, including The Ghost of Frankenstein, Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man and House of Dracula, with Chaney Jr. once sending a signed photo to Pierce with the following inscription:
To the greatest goddamned sadist in the world – L.C
___________________________________________________________________
By the mid-1940s technology was beginning to catch up with Jack Pierce. His stubborn refusal to use appliances rankled with the studio, who were keen to save time and budget in pursuit of greater profit. Pierce, always an artist first, continued to forge his own creative path, creating yet another iconic look for Claude Rains in a remake of Phantom of the Opera. When Universal merged with International Pictures in 1945, however, Pierce’s days were numbered and Bud Westmore was given the job in place of the 57-year-old. Westmore, a student of a more contemporary approach to makeup effects and a keen advocate of foam latex and masks for creature creations, took over and Pierce was quietly fired. During his time working for Universal, Unfortunately for Pierce, he had never signed a contract with the studio; such was his loyalty, and he thus received little more than a handshake for 30 years’ service.
The makeup artist saw out the remainder of his career working in a freelance capacity on B-pictures and occasionally on television shows. His last significant work was on a successful TV series about a talking horse, Mr. Ed, created by Pierce’s old friend from Universal, Arthur Lubin. Although his creations continued to be utilized until the mid-50s, by the time Pierce finally retired, the horror film industry had moved on and the public no longer clamored to see his monsters. Hammer Productions in the UK began their own series of films at the end of the 1950s based on the classic monsters, but Universal retained the rights to Pierce’s designs and refused to let Hammer impinge on their copyright.
Jack Pierce died from uremia on the 19th July 1968. At the time of his death, Pierce was living in near poverty, forgotten by the industry and genre that he’d helped to build. He was interred at Forest Lawn Memorial Park, Glendale, California with only a handful of people attending his funeral.
It seems profoundly sad that the name Jack Pierce is, even among horror fans to some degree, all but forgotten. Yet, when one conjures the image of Frankenstein’s Monster, it is without doubt that of the hulking Karloff, looming into view, flat-headed and sunken cheeked, bolts protruding from his neck. The same might be said of both Dracula, The Mummy and The Wolf Man, so ingrained on our conscious are Pierce’s creations. Still, their creator remains a mystery to most, despite inspiring a number of the twentieth century’s greatest makeup and special effects artists. Rick Baker and Tom Savini, for example, cite Pierce as a defining influence on their careers.
It’s entirely possible that Jack Pierce’s alleged reticence to move with the times and incorporate new technologies and techniques ultimately destroyed his career. Yet, this was the very same man who, when asked how makeup would evolve, replied with the following: “Looking forward, the future holds great possibilities. Makeup is only beginning to reach its artistic stride.”
How right he was.
Editorials
Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel
The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.
That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.
It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.
That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.
The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’
For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.
This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.
This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.
Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.
So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.
The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.
Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.
While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.
At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.
After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.





You must be logged in to post a comment.