Connect with us

Editorials

The Kids Are Not Alright: How Telltale’s Final Season of “The Walking Dead” Uses Children To Rediscover Tragic Horror

Published

on

After playing through the first season Telltale’s The Walking Dead, it was all too easy to look down at your stomach in consternation. Ultimately there had to be an explanation as to why in the absence of a physical fist actually sinking its way deep into your gut, you ended up feeling quite as unsettled as you did.

As it turned out, the answer was simple. The narrative scribblers at Telltale Games were really good at making their audience feel awful and their weapon of choice to achieve this with was children. With the zombie horror genre long subsisting on a diet of predicated scares and splatterfaction, it would not have been surprising to see Telltale lean on more traditional tropes – something that the third season of the series arguably does to its detriment.

As central protagonist Lee in that very first season, it was more than just survival; it was about taking care of abandoned young Clementine, keeping her safe and ensuring that she grows up into someone with a firmly adjusted moral compass. Certainly, Telltale’s decision to reposition the lens behind the doe-eyed, innocence of the young un’s is one that paid dividends; especially for parents where such peril would resonate all the more strongly.

With the final season of Telltale’s heralded series now underway, It’s funny how things have now come wonderfully full circle.

A good few years after the conclusion of that critically beloved first season, The Walking Dead: The Final Season enacts an interesting role swap. Now fully matured and more than capable of fending for herself and others, Clementine finds herself in the dual role of both protector and surrogate parent/big sister as she and her ward, the young orphan AJ, inch their way through a zombie-stuffed hellscape.

It’s hugely compelling stuff, not least because you find yourself far more emotionally invested in this little ragtag family unit than you ever would a bunch of older folk running about the place, making logically-barren decisions that get everybody killed in a number of hilarious different ways. Pointedly, this relationship echoes the dynamic that director James Cameron created over thirty years ago in his magnum opus Aliens, whereupon the battle-tested Ripley would go to any lengths to protect the young and innocent Newt from harm (thanks Davy Finch for nothing, by the way).

Where Telltale’s take on this precious bond differs though, is in how Clementine actually has enough time to be a proper guardian to AJ, and in doing so, imparts a sizable amount of her own traumatic life experience to him as sagely pearls of zombie-stabbing wisdom. Dispensing such critical and practical advice as ‘always aim for the head’ and ‘check for exits first’, Clementine’s years of struggle and hard-learned lessons are passed down to her juvenile charge, in turn acclimating him to the horror that has surrounded him since he was born.

As much big sister to little brother as it is a teacher to a student, the output of this engaging interconnection between the two is that they are far more capable than the duo of Clementine and Lee ever were. No longer just screaming hunks of meat waiting to get munched upon, Clem and AJ are instead well-conditioned, hardy and methodical killers. In essence, they represent a new generation of more efficient human survivors that no longer cling to the tenets of the old world but have instead adapted themselves to the grim status quo.

The cost to this level of preparedness however also brings a new, very different kind of horror too. In the very first episode of this final season, young AJ happens across a swinging tire. Rather than equating it with a fun pastime as most children would from the world before, he instead sees it as a trap – his well-honed sense of paranoia and self-preservation now somewhat tragically overriding the naivety of a childhood he will never experience.

And it’s this that really gets under your skin. Because AJ is a tragic figure, even more than Clementine who at least can remember the ‘time before’, the horror that he faces is constant and seemingly never-ending. Any light at the end of the tunnel is essentially non-existent at this point, while the world itself has turned into one massive bloated corpse and a shade of what it used to be before. This is quite literally the only world he has known.

Of course, the notion of putting kids in horror is nothing new as we know – from the likes of IT through to Stranger Things, it’s clear that there is a grand amount of storytelling potential in using the younger folk properly that isn’t solely restricted to obvious heartstring pulling.

For The Walking Dead though, the inclusion of children and their perspectives proves to be Telltale’s second bottle of lightning – a painfully engrossing way to get players engaged with the plight and horror of its world in a fashion that the risk-averse television show simply seems unable to do.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading