Connect with us

Editorials

[Editorial] The Crucial Ingredient That Makes the ‘Conjuring’ Movies So Refreshing

Published

on

Over the past five years, James Wan and the folks at New Line Cinema have built The Conjuring into a far more consistently entertaining horror series than most of us would have predicted after seeing the original film for the first time. This success can be chalked up to a number of factors, including the patience the franchise’s storytellers have had in slowly building up a cinematic universe rather than launching headfirst into it (unlike some studios who shall remain nameless). But there’s another reason the Conjuring movies have been so refreshing thus far, particularly the main Warren films. Despite being R-rated and utterly terrifying, this is a surprisingly earnest, wholesome, character-driven series of movies about good people who love each other and who are generally rewarded, not punished, for their compassion, respect, and open-mindedness.

This was established right away in the first film, which introduces us to the instantly likable paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren. Wan’s previous movie was Insidious, another story about a family who seeks professional help after experiencing supernatural occurrences. But in the original Insidious, the characters of Elise, Specs and Tucker mainly just function as plot devices and comic relief. These are roles they fill well, but they aren’t exactly fully realized characters we sympathize with and care for, although Elise would later get a more involved backstory. The Conjuring, on the other hand, spends a lot of time developing Ed and Lorraine before they even meet the Perron family and start working on the case.

We see that the Warrens have a healthy relationship and a daughter whom they love but spend too much time away from, and it’s immediately apparent that Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga have undeniable chemistry.

The Warrens, it becomes clear, are not one-dimensional ghost hunters who will simply guide the audience from one case to another throughout the series. Instead, The Conjuring is fundamentally about them and their love story. These are two people who respect one another deeply, and the central conflict has to do with Ed’s desire to protect Lorraine, fearful for her safety after a recent case left her shattered; we will later find out that she saw the most horrible thing she could imagine: the death of the most important person in her life, her husband. Yet as much as Ed objects to Lorraine helping save Carolyn Perron, when she insists they do so together as always, he doesn’t put his foot down. He has faith that Lorraine can handle herself, and Lorraine, in turn, has faith that Ed can perform the exorcism despite not being authorized. “You can do this,” she assures him.

Rather than one Warren needing to do it all on their own, the two realize that it’s only together that they’ll be able to vanquish the spirit infesting this family’s home, and indeed, it’s ultimately the combination of Ed’s performance of the exorcism and Lorraine’s insight that save the day. With both having believed in the other, the ending is as satisfying a victory for the Warrens as it is for the Perrons. “You did good,” Ed tells Lorraine. “No,” she replies. “You did.”

Even putting aside The Conjuring’s scares, the Warrens’ arc alone is enough to make it a great movie.

The themes of love and respect don’t just have to do with the Warrens, though. It’s also present with the Perron plot, as exemplified in a scene in which Carolyn tells Lorraine about a day her family had at the beach. In the third act, Ed goes through the exorcism process, but it’s not enough. Carolyn needs to fight from the inside, and it’s by recalling this wonderful, but fairly average, day with her family that she’s able to fend away the spirit that would do her children harm. It’s notable that the memory she calls upon isn’t any super iconic moment in her life but rather something a bit more mundane, because sometimes, it’s these smaller memories with loved ones that resonate far more than the ones of greater significance. In an unusually emotional ending for a horror film, the Perrons embrace in the sunlight as the triumphant music reaches a crescendo.

Oftentimes in a horror movie, moments of pure bliss such as these are followed by a last-minute twist. The characters thought they were safe, and it’s at this precise moment that the movie gods twist the proverbial knife. But not here. The Warrens and the Perrons legitimately earn their happy ending, and it’s at this point that we realize we just watched an R-rated horror blockbuster in which not a single person died or was even really injured, yet it never felt sterilized and was, in fact, more frightening than it would sound on paper because we were truly invested in the relationships between everyone involved.

The happy ending can be credited in part to the real-life story concluding with no fatalities, but since Wan already took a number of serious creative liberties, he had every opportunity to alter the narrative so as to wrap up on a more sinister note like Insidious. He does no such thing, letting the characters get off scot-free. In a weird way, the utterly cheerful finale is kind of daring, and this speaks to the success of the franchise as a whole. Wan even consciously steers clear of the “one last scare” cliche by slowly focusing in on the music box as we tense up waiting for something that never comes like a horror anti-joke. Granted, the fact that the box spins at all suggests there’s still evil out there, but whatever evil there is does not show itself, and because it’s contained in the Warrens’ artifact room, this isn’t exactly a downer.

In The Conjuring 2, the Warrens’ relationship is expanded upon much further, and we see some of their adorably pure lifestyle; Ed stops himself from saying the word “asshole” in private, and he’s so in love with his wife that he can’t stand it when they have to sleep in separate beds. We also see more of their daughter, Judy, who gives them each a kiss when she comes down to eat breakfast in the morning. None of this feels saccharine; it’s legitimately endearing, and we just find it pleasant to be around these people.

Although it was Ed wanting to keep Lorraine out of danger in the first film, this time, the tables are turned. Lorraine, it is now revealed, has been seeing visions of Ed’s death. But the sequel makes clear that Ed and Lorraine are driven almost to an unhealthy degree by helping families who need them. They’re like the superheroes of the horror genre. As Ed tells Lorraine in one scene, “There has never been a family that we’ve refused to help.” Loraine is reluctant to get involved in this case, though, being so afraid to lose Ed just as Ed was so afraid to lose her before.

When they ultimately go to assist the Hodgson family in Enfield, Lorraine becomes close with Janet Hodgson, and she talks with her about the importance of finding people in this world who you can place your complete and total trust in. “One person can change everything, and you just have to open up to them,” Lorraine says. Janet asks, “How did you know you could trust the people you opened up to?” Lorraine answers, “I didn’t, and sometimes I got hurt.” This becomes the central theme of the movie, as Janet is being targeted by the demon, Valak, but nobody knows whether to believe her, and Janet can’t be sure who she can open up to about it. Already a bit of an outcast, she is alone and afraid, and the Warrens naturally relate. We learn that both Ed and Lorraine had nobody to believe them for an interminable amount of time, only to eventually find each other, which Lorraine believes was God’s plan.

When it comes to this case, the Warrens could easily take the cynical approach and conclude that this little girl is making the whole thing up; there’s plenty of reason to think that, especially since, as the film establishes, the Warrens investigate a lot of cases that don’t lead to anything. But they could also take a leap of faith and trust in the decency of others, a choice these two select at every opportunity. That faith is tested when video seems to prove that Janet was making the whole thing up. The Warrens start to head home, only to begin second-guessing their worst assumptions about Janet. They’re inherently positive people, after all, who are always willing to believe when no one else will. Thanks to this optimism (and Ed dropping his luggage in a very convenient way), the Warrens return to the Hodgson house and are able to cast out the very real Valak.

Once again, it’s Ed and Lorraine’s combined efforts — Ed saves Janet, while Lorraine saves both Ed and Janet — that allow them to succeed, and Lorraine truly did see her vision of Ed’s death so that she could prevent it. After leading us to believe the film might end on a needlessly upsetting note with Ed dying, Wan swerves in the other direction. The Warrens were truly supposed to be together, and it’s their compassion for Janet that allows them to save the day. “Didn’t I tell you it was meant to be,” Ed tells Lorraine. As the two embrace, it’s at this point that it becomes clear just how fine a job Wan has done making us care about this relationship and how much the Warrens’ development over the course of two films has paid off.

The second film also reinforces that the whole series, at least thus far, is about our bonds with others and how these bonds, as well as the willingness of good people to stand up in the face of ever-present evil, will be our salvation in this terrifying world. Had Wan only been concerned with scaring us, after all, he wouldn’t pepper the movie with scenes like the one in which Ed sings “Can’t Help Falling in Love” to the Hodgsons, both a sweet moment of the family coming together during a difficult time and a personal message from Ed to his wife. Just vaguely gesturing towards having nice characters and positive messages in the movie obviously wouldn’t be enough, but Wan puts in the time and the effort. Few other directors would devote over two full minutes of their mainstream horror film to a scene where a character sings a love song, but that’s what happens when you allow yourself to be as earnest as Wan, knowing full well that annoying teenagers in the theater will probably laugh at the film’s unabashed sincerity or grow impatient because nothing scary has happened in a while.

The beautiful final moments call back to this scene by having Lorraine finally getting the record of “Can’t Help Falling in Love” playing. By this point, the evil has been defeated, and everything appears to be completely fine. Like in the first movie, it couldn’t be a happier ending, so once again, we expect a last-minute twist where the characters get screwed over in some way. Clearly, you aren’t allowed to be this joyful in a horror film without being punished for it. At the very least, we expect some tease that evil will return in the third film. But that doesn’t happen. Ed and Lorraine dance to this love song as the film fades to black, cuts to credits, and that’s it.

For once, a horror movie ends in a way that might actually make you cry rather than make you scream.

One might assume that without Ed and Lorraine, and without James Wan in the director’s chair, the Annabelle spinoff films would carry an entirely different tone, and that’s partially true in that these are the only movies in the series in which main characters actually die. But the idea of following well fleshed out, decent people and their relationships with one another continues with the first Annabelle. In this prequel, John and Mia are good-hearted souls who are struggling to adapt to a changing, increasingly dark world around them, as Manson Family type murders play out in the backdrop of the 1967-set story. In one early scene, John leaves the door of the house unlocked, and Mia tells him, “You have to start locking it. It’s a different world now.”

Later in the film, Mia is brutally stabbed during a break-in, and afterward, she again has to remind John to lock the door. That different world she was talking about has reared its ugly head, and it’s understandable why the couple would find it difficult to trust anyone other than each other ever again after nearly losing their unborn child. They’re not the only ones who feel that way, either. In their new apartment building, Mia strikes up a conversation with two children who live nearby, but they push her away, as they’re not allowed to talk to strangers.

But it’s actually a stranger, Evelyn, who saves John and Mia by sacrificing herself at the end in Mia’s place. We find out that Evelyn lost her daughter in a car accident years earlier, and she echoes Lorraine’s statement in the first movie about God having a purpose for her; that purpose turns out to be saving this young couple. Even though someone has to die, Annabelle’s ending is ultimately another happy one. John, Mia and their baby are safe, and Evelyn has fulfilled her destiny and has been reunited with her daughter. The movie suggests that when the world seems to have gone crazy, the answer is not to shield ourselves from our neighbors but open up to them and offer our love, a similar sentiment as was expressed in The Conjuring 2.

The sequel, Annabelle: Creation, is a bit of a departure tone wise. It does focus on the love between two friends, young orphans who promise never to leave one another. But it ends on a real bummer, with the main character, Janice, staying possessed, only to grow up, kill her adoptive parents, and commit suicide. This ending is a miss for the franchise, not because it’s dark but just because it is not earned and seems like an unnecessary last-minute attempt to tie an otherwise completely standalone movie into its predecessor.

But Creation is overall another solid entry into the series because, like the first three Conjuring universe films, it puts in the time to develop sympathetic characters and make the audience invest in their relationships with one another. In this case, the friendship between Janice and Linda is just as strong as the romance between Mia and John in the first Annabelle, which is why it’s so heartbreaking to see it end the way it does. With The Nun and onward, this character-first approach will hopefully continue, and it’s certainly fine for the spinoffs to do their own thing with the tone and the ending as long as the main movies with the Warrens remain infectiously optimistic.

Horror films are often populated either by awful people whose terrible behavior is punished or virtuous people who either die or make it out alive only by losing everything they care about, with the film concluding on the bleak note that more terror may await them. Even when everyone makes it out okay, as is not uncommon in haunted house movies based on true stories, it’s unlikely that we feel much joy throughout the film leading up to that point. The Conjuring movies offer something else entirely. Although Annabelle: Creation went off the beaten path with its final five minutes, for the most part, this has been a series full of people who are fated to be together, one that espouses ideas about acceptance, faith, destiny, and love, and one that manages to consistently give us nightmares while also allowing us to leave with positive feelings about the world around us. These days, that’s quite a gift.

Editorials

Five Serial Killer Horror Movies to Watch Before ‘Longlegs’

Published

on

Pictured: 'Fallen'

Here’s what we know about Longlegs so far. It’s coming in July of 2024, it’s directed by Osgood Perkins (The Blackcoat’s Daughter), and it features Maika Monroe (It Follows) as an FBI agent who discovers a personal connection between her and a serial killer who has ties to the occult. We know that the serial killer is going to be played by none other than Nicolas Cage and that the marketing has been nothing short of cryptic excellence up to this point.

At the very least, we can assume NEON’s upcoming film is going to be a dark, horror-fueled hunt for a serial killer. With that in mind, let’s take a look at five disturbing serial killers-versus-law-enforcement stories to get us even more jacked up for Longlegs.


MEMORIES OF MURDER (2003)

This South Korean film directed by Oscar-winning director Bong Joon-ho (Parasite) is a wild ride. The film features a handful of cops who seem like total goofs investigating a serial killer who brutally murders women who are out and wearing red on rainy evenings. The cops are tired, unorganized, and border on stoner comedy levels of idiocy. The movie at first seems to have a strange level of forgiveness for these characters as they try to pin the murders on a mentally handicapped person at one point, beating him and trying to coerce him into a confession for crimes he didn’t commit. A serious cop from the big city comes down to help with the case and is able to instill order.

But still, the killer evades and provokes not only the police but an entire country as everyone becomes more unstable and paranoid with each grizzly murder and sex crime.

I’ve never seen a film with a stranger tone than Memories of Murder. A movie that deals with such serious issues but has such fallible, seemingly nonserious people at its core. As the film rolls on and more women are murdered, you realize that a lot of these faults come from men who are hopeless and desperate to catch a killer in a country that – much like in another great serial killer story, Citizen X – is doing more harm to their plight than good.

Major spoiler warning: What makes Memories of Murder somehow more haunting is that it’s loosely based on a true story. It is a story where the real-life killer hadn’t been caught at the time of the film’s release. It ends with our main character Detective Park (Song Kang-ho), now a salesman, looking hopelessly at the audience (or judgingly) as the credits roll. Over sixteen years later the killer, Lee Choon Jae, was found using DNA evidence. He was already serving a life sentence for another murder. Choon Jae even admitted to watching the film during his court case saying, “I just watched it as a movie, I had no feeling or emotion towards the movie.”

In the end, Memories of Murder is a must-see for fans of the subgenre. The film juggles an almost slapstick tone with that of a dark murder mystery and yet, in the end, works like a charm.


CURE (1997)

Longlegs serial killer Cure

If you watched 2023’s Hypnotic and thought to yourself, “A killer who hypnotizes his victims to get them to do his bidding is a pretty cool idea. I only wish it were a better movie!” Boy, do I have great news for you.

In Cure (spoilers ahead), a detective (Koji Yakusho) and forensic psychologist (Tsuyoshi Ujiki) team up to find a serial killer who’s brutally marking their victims by cutting a large “X” into their throats and chests. Not just a little “X” mind you but a big, gross, flappy one.

At each crime scene, the murderer is there and is coherent and willing to cooperate. They can remember committing the crimes but can’t remember why. Each of these murders is creepy on a cellular level because we watch the killers act out these crimes with zero emotion. They feel different than your average movie murder. Colder….meaner.

What’s going on here is that a man named Mamiya (Masato Hagiwara) is walking around and somehow manipulating people’s minds using the flame of a lighter and a strange conversational cadence to hypnotize them and convince them to murder. The detectives eventually catch him but are unable to understand the scope of what’s happening before it’s too late.

If you thought dealing with a psychopathic murderer was hard, imagine dealing with one who could convince you to go home and murder your wife. Not only is Cure amazingly filmed and edited but it has more horror elements than your average serial killer film.


MANHUNTER (1986)

Longlegs serial killer manhunter

In the first-ever Hannibal Lecter story brought in front of the cameras, Detective Will Graham (William Petersen) finds his serial killers by stepping into their headspace. This is how he caught Hannibal Lecter (played here by Brian Cox), but not without paying a price. Graham became so obsessed with his cases that he ended up having a mental breakdown.

In Manhunter, Graham not only has to deal with Lecter playing psychological games with him from behind bars but a new serial killer in Francis Dolarhyde (in a legendary performance by Tom Noonan). One who likes to wear pantyhose on his head and murder entire families so that he can feel “seen” and “accepted” in their dead eyes. At one point Lecter even finds a way to gift Graham’s home address to the new killer via personal ads in a newspaper.

Michael Mann (Heat, Thief) directed a film that was far too stylish for its time but that fans and critics both would have loved today in the same way we appreciate movies like Nightcrawler or Drive. From the soundtrack to the visuals to the in-depth psychoanalysis of an insanely disturbed protagonist and the man trying to catch him. We watch Graham completely lose his shit and unravel as he takes us through the psyche of our killer. Which is as fascinating as it is fucked.

Manhunter is a classic case of a serial killer-versus-detective story where each side of the coin is tarnished in their own way when it’s all said and done. As Detective Park put it in Memories of Murder, “What kind of detective sleeps at night?”


INSOMNIA (2002)

Insomnia Nolan

Maybe it’s because of the foggy atmosphere. Maybe it’s because it’s the only film in Christopher Nolan’s filmography he didn’t write as well as direct. But for some reason, Insomnia always feels forgotten about whenever we give Nolan his flowers for whatever his latest cinematic achievement is.

Whatever the case, I know it’s no fault of the quality of the film, because Insomnia is a certified serial killer classic that adds several unique layers to the detective/killer dynamic. One way to create an extreme sense of unease with a movie villain is to cast someone you’d never expect in the role, which is exactly what Nolan did by casting the hilarious and sweet Robin Williams as a manipulative child murderer. He capped that off by casting Al Pacino as the embattled detective hunting him down.

This dynamic was fascinating as Williams was creepy and clever in the role. He was subdued in a way that was never boring but believable. On the other side of it, Al Pacino felt as if he’d walked straight off the set of 1995’s Heat and onto this one. A broken and imperfect man trying to stop a far worse one.

Aside from the stellar acting, Insomnia stands out because of its unique setting and plot. Both working against the detective. The investigation is taking place in a part of Alaska where the sun never goes down. This creates a beautiful, nightmare atmosphere where by the end of it, Pacino’s character is like a Freddy Krueger victim in the leadup to their eventual, exhausted death as he runs around town trying to catch a serial killer while dealing with the debilitating effects of insomnia. Meanwhile, he’s under an internal affairs investigation for planting evidence to catch another child killer and accidentally shoots his partner who he just found out is about to testify against him. The kicker here is that the killer knows what happened that fateful day and is using it to blackmail Pacino’s character into letting him get away with his own crimes.

If this is the kind of “what would you do?” intrigue we get with the story from Longlegs? We’ll be in for a treat. Hoo-ah.


FALLEN (1998)

Longlegs serial killer fallen

Fallen may not be nearly as obscure as Memories of Murder or Cure. Hell, it boasts an all-star cast of Denzel Washington, John Goodman, Donald Sutherland, James Gandolfini, and Elias Koteas. But when you bring it up around anyone who has seen it, their ears perk up, and the word “underrated” usually follows. And when it comes to the occult tie-ins that Longlegs will allegedly have? Fallen may be the most appropriate film on this entire list.

In the movie, Detective Hobbs (Washington) catches vicious serial killer Edgar Reese (Koteas) who seems to place some sort of curse on him during Hobbs’ victory lap. After Reese is put to death via electric chair, dead bodies start popping up all over town with his M.O., eventually pointing towards Hobbs as the culprit. After all, Reese is dead. As Hobbs investigates he realizes that a fallen angel named Azazel is possessing human body after human body and using them to commit occult murders. It has its eyes fixated on him, his co-workers, and family members; wrecking their lives or flat-out murdering them one by one until the whole world is damned.

Mixing a demonic entity into a detective/serial killer story is fascinating because it puts our detective in the unsettling position of being the one who is hunted. How the hell do you stop a demon who can inhabit anyone they want with a mere touch?!

Fallen is a great mix of detective story and supernatural horror tale. Not only are we treated to Denzel Washington as the lead in a grim noir (complete with narration) as he uncovers this occult storyline, but we’re left with a pretty great “what would you do?” situation in a movie that isn’t afraid to take the story to some dark places. Especially when it comes to the way the film ends. It’s a great horror thriller in the same vein as Frailty but with a little more detective work mixed in.


Look for Longlegs in theaters on July 12, 2024.

Longlegs serial killer

Continue Reading