Connect with us

Editorials

[Editorial] It’s Probably Time for “Castle Rock” to Actually Start Answering Some Questions, Yeah?

Published

on

Eight episodes deep and only two remaining, this mystery box remains frustratingly closed.

Back in episode 5 of Hulu’s “Castle Rock, actor Bill Skarsgård’s “The Kid” essentially created a “Castle Rock” internet meme when he said to Alan Pangborn, “You have no idea what’s happening here… do you?” For viewers, this line of dialogue has become a go-to reaction to the series’ many twists and turns, as Hulu insists on keeping us all as in the dark as possible while still making sure we’re tuning in each and every week in the hopes of getting some answers. Instead, however, new episodes mostly ask entirely new questions.

At this point, watching “Castle Rock” has become like trying to put together a puzzle but there are so many pieces missing and someone keeps tossing pieces from other puzzles onto the pile.

Mind you, much like “Lost” (also produced by J.J. Abrams), part of the fun of “Castle Rock” is speculating and theorizing on the various plot threads, and I’ve personally had a whole lot of fun doing just that these last two months. Hell, there was one point where I was convinced Skarsgård’s “The Kid” was actually King’s “IT,” and another point where you couldn’t convince me that Sissy Spacek’s Ruth Deaver *wasn’t* Carrie White. The internet has been flooded with various fan theories, including everything from time loops to alternate universes.

But at what point do the mysteries of “Castle Rock” go from compelling to frustrating? And at what point does the series fall into the same traps that “American Horror Story” seems to every season, where there’s so much going on and so little of it makes sense that you just stop caring about the whole damn thing? With only two episodes remaining for the series’ writers to wrap everything up and bring it all together, I ponder, have we reached that point?

This week’s episode, titled ‘Past Perfect,’ was particularly loaded up with more questions, yet again introducing new characters and storylines at a time when the series should probably be hyper focused on bringing clarity to the table; after all, there’s only going to be one season of this particular storyline, with subsequent seasons set to tell entirely different stories.

“Castle Rock” kicked off this week with a proper introduction to husband and wife Gordon and Lilith, two characters we briefly met earlier in the season. The duo, on rocky ground in the wake of Gordon finding out Lilith was cheating on him with a much younger colleague, has purchased Warden Lacy’s home and turned it into a bed and breakfast that plays up the sketchy, murderous side of the notorious town. As it turns out, Gordon and Lilith are a murder couple in their own right; Gordon kills a couple staying at their home, and Lilith is surprisingly chill about it. Later, when Henry Deaver arrives at the house in search of answers, Gordon and Lilith team up in an attempt to kill him – an attempt thwarted by an axe wielding Jackie Torrance.

In a fun little homage to Jackie’s familial ties to one of Stephen King’s most iconic stories (Jane Levy’s character is the niece of Jack Torrance), Jackie slams an axe down into the top of Gordon’s head while he’s on top of Henry. The series has told us precious little about Jackie, and it sure was nice to finally see Levy playing a role in a major storyline.

The crux of ‘Past Perfect’ was that “The Kid” is *seemingly* making people in the town do horrible things, as both Gordon and Jackie seem to be under his supernatural control when committing barbaric acts they otherwise probably would never have; in Jackie’s own words, “I wasn’t myself anymore.” Sounds a bit like her uncle Jack, doesn’t it?

Is “The Kid” responsible for everything evil that has ever happened in King’s stories…?

So what else happened in ‘Past Perfect’, an episode loaded with unnerving intrigue. Let’s see. Henry discovered what we already know when he learned through annual paintings from Warden Lacy that “The Kid” hasn’t aged a day in 27 years, and “The Kid” also revealed to him that it was he who saved Henry 27 years prior… from a basement, he says. “I waited for you… for 27 years,” Skarsgård’s character tells Henry, while “The Kid” reveals something even more bizarre to Molly Strand: she’s… uh… wait… is Molly actually dead?!

“The Kid” explains to Molly, who is tripping hardcore on pain killers (props to the episode’s score in the final moments, which reflects Molly’s drug-addled state of mind in incredibly effective ways), that he knows her and she knows him, as he was present during her childhood. He also tells Molly that she died out in the woods of Castle Rock… and then, as the series loves to do at the exact moment it drops some crazy shit on us, the episode smashes to black and forces us to wait another week for hopefully an explanation but probably more questions.

“I don’t think [Henry’s] ready yet,” he tells Molly. “But you can help me.”

It may sound like I’m hating on “Castle Rock,” but the truth is that I’m only frustrated because I’m so intrigued and have become so invested in the series these past eight weeks. I’m also worried. Worried that too many ideas are at play and there’s just not enough time to wrap everything up. I’ll say this much. If “Castle Rock” ends up coming together in an even remotely satisfying way these final two weeks, it’ll be a majorly impressive feat. I don’t need *all* the answers, but here’s hoping the long, slow journey was well worth it in the end.

Oh and more Jane Levy, please.

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading