Connect with us

Editorials

On “The Goldbergs,” Robert Englund Just Proved He’s Ready for One More ‘Nightmare on Elm Street’

Published

on

After *the real* Freddy Krueger’s return on the small screen, it’s time to go bigger.

Believe it or not, we’re now 15 years removed from the last time Robert Englund played Freddy Krueger in a feature film, that film being 2003’s mashup fight flick Freddy vs. Jason. Of course, we haven’t gone completely without Freddy in those 15 years, as Jackie Earle Haley took over the role for 2010’s A Nightmare on Elm Street. But we don’t talk about that.

For the last several years, Englund has repeatedly vowed that Freddy vs. Jason was his swan song as the character, despite a couple of convention appearances in Freddy makeup. Every time he’s been asked about returning to the role, Englund has shot it down, repeating over and over again that he’s just no longer interested or even capable of going full Freddy.

“I’m too old to do another Freddy now,” Englund bluntly stated just last year.

But then something miraculous happened. Just a couple months back, it was announced that Robert Englund actually *would* be playing Freddy Krueger one more time, in a special Halloween episode of “The Goldbergs” that was to spoof/pay tribute to the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise. To make a long story short, series creator Adam F. Goldberg was able to convince Englund to slap on the makeup and striped sweater for the fans, and that episode of the ’80s-set series (humorously titled “Mister Knifey-Hands”) aired tonight on ABC.

Not only did Englund’s brief appearance on “The Goldbergs” this week deliver the goods, but more importantly, it may very well have been the catalyst for what we all really want.

One… more… movie.

But first, the big question heading into the Halloween episode of “The Goldbergs” was simple: Does Robert Englund still have it in him, or was he right to retire from his most iconic role in the wake of Freddy vs. Jason? In his cameo appearance, the 71-year-old Englund reprised the role of Freddy for a fun nightmare sequence, which saw him share the screen with actress Wendi McLendon-Covey. Not that it came as any surprise, but Englund proved that yes, he’s still got it, disappearing back into the character for a revival performance short but oh-so-sweet.

If you missed it, check out Englund’s scenes from “Mister Knifey-Hands” below. Turn up the volume and revel in a 71-year-old actor still slaying a role he first played in his thirties.

If Robert Englund’s cameo on “The Goldbergs” left you hungry for more, the best possible news here is that it seems to have made Englund himself hungry for more. Earlier this week, Englund teased during an interview that he *might* have one more Nightmare on Elm Street movie left in him, the fire seemingly re-lit within him in the wake of filming “The Goldbergs.”

Adam F. Goldberg even tweeted directly to New Line tonight after the episode premiered, doubling down on Englund’s exciting comments: “Robert said he’d never be Freddy again, but had so much fun when we shot he’s now open to it. I did my job, now you do yours!

As Goldberg stressed, he’s hopeful that Englund’s cameo on “The Goldbergs” will lead to one more full-on performance in a reboot of the original Nightmare on Elm Street franchise, and the stars sure do seem to be aligning for that to happen. After all, the smash hit box office success of Halloween this past weekend has surely compelled New Line to at least consider bringing back Elm Street, and the fact that Englund is now open to coming back for at least one more movie puts the studio in a no-brainer situation. I beg of you, New Line. Make. That. Call.

New Line is the house that Robert Englund built. It’s time to let him back in one last time.

Side note, even if the last we ever see of Robert Englund’s Freddy was on “The Goldbergs” this week, the good news there is that Goldberg hopes to release an “uncut version” of the episode at some point in the near future. What does that mean, exactly? According to Goldberg, “So much amazing Freddy stuff had to be cut to make our 21 minutes of air time.”

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

‘Arachnid’ – Revisiting the 2001 Spider Horror Movie Featuring Massive Practical Effects

Published

on

arachnid

A new breed of creature-features was unleashed in the 1990s and continued well into the next decade. Shaking off the ecological messaging of the past, these monsters existed for the sake of pure mayhem. Just to name a few: Tremors, The Relic, Anaconda, Godzilla, Deep Rising and Lake Placid all showcased this trend of irreverent creature chaos. Reptiles and other scaly beasts proved to be a popular source of inspiration for these films, but for that extra crawly experience, bugs were the best and quickest route. Spiders, in particular, led some of the worst infestations on screen in the early 2000s. And on the underbelly of this creeping new wave — specifically the direct-to-video sector — hangs an overlooked offering of spider horror: Arachnid.

In 2000, Brian Yuzna and Julio Fernández launched the Spanish production company Fantastic Factory. The Filmax banner’s objective was to create modestly budgeted genre films for international distribution. And while they achieved their goal — a total of nine English-language films were produced and shipped all across the globe — Fantastic Factory ultimately closed up shop after only five years. Arachnid, directed by Jack Sholder (Alone in the Dark, A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge, The Hidden) and based on a script by Mark Sevi, was the second project from the short-lived genre house. Yuzna was drawn to the concept largely because of its universal appeal; a monster was marketable in any region, regardless of cultural preferences or restrictions. There was also the fact that spiders give everyone a case of the heebie-jeebies.

By having extraterrestrial forces be the cause of the spiders’ mutism and immensity as well as other urgent problems within the story, Arachnid incidentally pays respect to Hollywood’s golden age of schlock filmmaking. The opening sequence indeed shows a stealth plane’s pilot (Jesús Cabrero) trailing a UFO and its translucent passenger to an island in the South Pacific, but the alien business is kept to a minimum going forward. There is no time to process this seismic revelation of life beyond Earth before moving on to the film’s central plot. 

arachnid

Pictured: Alex Reid, Chris Potter and Neus Asensi’s characters get trapped in the spider’s web in Arachnid.

Several months since the E.T. was last sighted — and after being snuffed out by one of its own accidental creations — a medical team from Guam heads to Celebes (better known as Sulawesi nowadays), in search of whatever is behind a new illness. The doctors (played by José Sancho and Neus Asensi) already suspected a spider bite, although they failed to consider the biter could be the size of a tank. With The Descent’s Alex Reid as the snarky pilot of this doomed expedition, one who has ulterior motives for accepting the job, the film’s core characters go off in search of a spider and, hopefully, a cure.

The title makes it seem as if there is only the one arachnid in the story, but once Chris Potter and Reid’s characters plus their team step foot on the island, they encounter other altered arthropods. Yuzna felt Sevi’s script needed more creatures along the way, especially before the spider showed up in full view. The bug horror commences as one gunsman succumbs to a burrowing breed of crab-sized ticks, and random characters fend off a horrific centipede with reptilian qualities. These are just the appetizers before the greatest arachnid of them all arrives. The late Ravil Isyanov, here playing a zealous but sympathetic arachnologist, becomes a human Lunchable for the spider’s eggs. And one of the doctors gets a face full of corrosive spider spew. So, there is no shortage of grisly predation in the film, with a few bits of the monsters’ handiwork possessing a haunting quality to them.

Shot quickly and cheaply, Arachnid is fast-food horror. It’s convenient and designed for immediate consumption, and will likely not linger on the palate. Usually there is not a lot worth remembering with these slapdash genre productions, however, this is one case of spider horror where the extra effort made a difference. Apart from the egregious use of digital imagery in the outset, Jack Sholder’s film primarily employs practical effects. And these are not rubber spiders dangling from strings or being flung at the actors, either. Fantastic Factory aimed much higher by securing DDTSFX (Pan’s Labyrinth, Hellboy II: The Golden Army) and creature designer and makeup artist Steve Johnson (Species, Blade II).

arachnid

Pictured: One of the spider’s web-covered victims in Arachnid.

Arachnid, while far from flawless, somewhat redeems itself by having chosen practical effects and animatronics over CGI, which had become the new normal in these kinds of films. And this class of creature-feature was definitely not getting the sort of advanced VFX found in the likes of Eight Legged Freaks. Steve Johnson’s spider was not the easiest prop to work with, and it lacks the movement and versatility of a digital depiction. However, there is no beating that sense of weight and occupation of space that makes a tangible monster more intimidating. Viewers will have trouble recalling the human characters long after watching Arachnid, yet the humongous headliner remains the stuff of nightmares.

Over the years, the director has spoken critically of the film. He originally held off on agreeing to the offer to direct in hopes that another project, a Steven Seagal picture, would finally manifest. No such luck, and Sholder accepted Arachnid only on account of his needing the work. He said of the film: “I thought I could […] make it halfway decent, but I discovered there wasn’t a whole lot I could do.” Nevertheless, Sholder’s experience as a director of not exactly high-brow yet still rather entertaining horror is evident in what he has since called a “dud.” While there is no denying the reality and outcome of Arachnid, even the most mediocre films have their strokes of brilliance, small as they may be.

Arachnid

Pictured: The poster for Arachnid.

Continue Reading