Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

[It Came From the ‘80s] ‘Day of the Dead’ and Its Endearing Zombie Bub

Published

on

zombie movies to stream Day of the DEad

With horror industry heavy hitters already in place from the 1970s, the 1980s built upon that with the rise of brilliant minds in makeup and effects artists, as well as advances in technology. Artists like Rick Baker, Rob Bottin, Alec Gillis, Tom Woodruff Jr., Tom Savini, Stan Winston, and countless other artists that delivered groundbreaking, mind-blowing practical effects that ushered in the pre-CGI Golden Age of Cinema. Which meant a glorious glut of creatures in horror. More than just a technical marvel, the creatures on display in ‘80s horror meant tangible texture that still holds up decades laterGrotesque slimy skin to brutal transformation sequences, there wasn’t anything the artists couldn’t create. It Came From the ‘80s is a series that will pay homage to the monstrous, deadly, and often slimy creatures that made the ‘80s such a fantastic decade in horror.

The third entry of George A. Romero’s Dead series shows the world completely inundated by zombies. What little of humanity is left remains barricaded underground clinging to survival while scientists remain hopeful for a cure.  Though the numbers have vastly dwindled prior to the start of the film, the future of civilization looks bleak due to the handful of remaining survivors being unable to get along.  Nestled between the pragmatic scientists and the increasingly unhinged soldiers lies Dr. Matthew Logan (Richard Liberty, The Crazies), the cheerful lead scientist, and his favorite test subject Bub, a zombie that shares more in common with Frankenstein’s creation than he does the rest of his kind.

Played by the amiable Sherman Howard, Bub is a docile zombie that loves listening to music, saluting soldiers, and even uttering mostly unintelligible speech. Dr. Logan has deduced that keeping Bub well-satiated means that he’s no longer driven by his hunger impulses that render zombies the feeding frenzied undead that they are. So, for all of Bub’s endearing charm, there’s always an undercurrent of danger; if Bub doesn’t stay fed, well, he’ll revert back to his impulsive ways. Luckily, Romero ensures that Bub retains some memory of who treated him well and who didn’t when starvation mode inevitably sets it. All of this to say that Bub became the breakout star of Day of the Dead.

Due to budget constraints that left Romero rewriting the script multiple times, Bub almost turned out very differently. When Sherman was first cast to play the zombie, the initial script he read saw Bub as a leader of a team of trained zombie fighters. Bub would’ve been far less docile and much more of a Wild West rough and tumble type. Romero’s rewrite removed that component of Bub, and his collaborative style meant that Sherman had the freedom to shape Bub even further into sympathetic terrain.

While Sherman was responsible for breathing undead life into Bub, the special makeup effects also played a major role in Bub’s horror icon status. Romero once again reteamed with Tom Savini for Day of the Dead, who filled out his crew with talents like sculptor John Vulich (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, The X-Files), sculptor Mike Trcic (Jurassic Park, In the Mouth of Madness), mechanization specialist Dave Kindlon (Predator, The Blob, The Monster Squad), Everett Burrell (Pan’s Labyrinth, Blade: Trinity), Greg Nicotero (The Mist, The Walking Dead), and Howard Berger (The Mist, The Walking Dead). Bub may have been a centerpiece character, but the crew created no shortage of gruesome and gory zombies. Dr. Tongue is another favored standout.

Lori Cardille’s research scientist Sarah may be the audience proxy and the lead protagonist, but Romero often considered Bub to be the central character. In his Dead series, it’s always the humans that are the true monsters, and Romero’s affection for his undead creations are clear. In this case, it’s the ruthless Captain Henry Rhodes (Joseph Pilato) and his team of amoral men that are the villains. Bub is just a misunderstood zombie. Thanks to great makeup work and a powerfully charming performance by Sherman, Bub remains an all-time great horror character.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading