Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

The Dying Art of the Horror Movie Title Sequence

Published

on

More often than not these days, filmmakers opt to jump right into their films without any preamble, skipping any elaborate opening credits. For some, it’s a style choice, but for others it’s simply due to statistics and surveys that show audiences prefer not to see them and get straight to the point. While the title sequence still pops up now and again, it’s nowhere near as prevalent as it once was, making this artform a dying breed.

What exactly is a title sequence? At its most basic level, a title sequence gives the film’s title, obviously, as well as credits for the cast and crew involved. But it also sets the tone of the film ahead. It captures the essence of what the film is about, a sort of tease. Take Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining, for example. The long-winding shots overhead of the family’s road trip to the Overlook Hotel while the ominous theme music plays and the credits scroll gives an overall sense of foreboding and dread that carries through the entire movie.  Here are more examples that prove how effective the title sequence can be, and a few that keep the artform alive.


Frankenstein (1931)

The title sequence for Universal’s 1931 adaptation of Frankenstein begins with a warning on behalf of the producers by character actor Edward Van Sloan. It’s full of theatrics that promises shock and horror to come. Perhaps even more interesting is that the opening credits list The Monster as being played by a question mark. It’s not until the end credits that the actor is revealed to be Boris Karloff.


Halloween

Like John Carpenter’s simple yet effective theme music, this title sequence manages to accomplish a lot with simplicity. A black background with orange text and a jack o’ lantern flickering orange with candlelight, it’s pure holiday menace. And whether you enjoyed Halloween 2018 or not, how amazing was this callback to the original film via title sequence?


Creepshow

After an opening scene that sets up this anthology’s wraparound, which sees a boy seeking revenge by way of horror comic, the title sequence encapsulates that comic book aesthetic. Vivid animation and matching music set the tone of the film. Moreover, if you’re paying attention, the images give teases of the segments to come.


The Thing

You can always count on John Carpenter to nail a title sequence. Beginning quietly before Ennio Morricone’s score kicks in, it’s the music that sets the tone against plain black and white credits. The title sequence closes with an impressive title effect by Special Optical Effects supervisor Peter Kuran that pays homage to The Thing from Another World.


A Nightmare on Elm Street

What an amazing way to introduce an audience to the central boogeyman without giving too much away. The title and credits are intercut with images of that now iconic glove being assembled and the unnerving boiler room nightmare of Tina. This is how you make an entrance.


Night of the Demons

When you think of title sequences in horror movies, this animated opening almost always comes to mind. A playful animation sequence that invokes haunted houses and Halloween spirit signals that the movie that follows has fun on its mind. That is was handled by animator and artist Kathy Zielinski, known for her work in Disney and The Simpsons, further cemented this title sequence as an all-time great.


Se7en

Up until this point, the title sequence had just about died out completely. David Fincher’s Se7en kickstarted a new renaissance of title sequences thanks to its intricate and highly detailed opening credits. Directed by Kyle Cooper, it’s a series of images and fragments as killer John Doe makes entries in his diary, develops photos, and cuts out book clippings. It all gives the viewer a glimpse into the mind of a serial killer.


The Cabin in the Woods

After an ominous set of credits set to a serious score and red tinted depictions of hell, it abruptly cuts to a seemingly mundane lab with a trio of employees exchanging mundane banter. It’s an intentional set up for the jump scare- the title card. This sequence gives you everything you need to know about the film; at first glance it’s pure horror, but it eventually gives way to humor that lovingly spoofs the horror genre.


Climax

There are many filmmakers today that are doing their part to keep the spirit of title sequences going, and Gaspar Noe is leading the pack. A provocateur that manipulates the format of a title sequence with aggressive style that boldly declares the madness sure to follow, Noe’s work is unlike anyone else’s. In Climax, the main credits don’t even pop up until halfway through; Noe uses them as a way to break up the film into two parts. Tom Kan, the artist behind Noe’s title sequences, give each actor unique font corresponding with their personalities. It’s heavily stylized, and follows on the heels of a pulse-pounding overhead dance number. Noe’s a rulebreaker in every way, and his title sequences serve as a perfect introduction.

What movies have your favorite title sequences?

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading