Editorials
Flight and Fright: Richard Matheson’s “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” and Its Many Adaptations
After nearly 60 years, Richard Matheson’s short story “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” still packs the same ice-cold punch to the gut that it did back when it was first published and continues to reign as one of the finest horror tales ever conceived. It’s an expertly-crafted and seminal work and has been adapted for the screen twice and was most recently paid homage in an episode of Jordan Peele’s reboot of The Twilight Zone.
First appearing in the anthology Alone by Night in 1961, the story is perhaps Matheson’s best known and serves as a textbook example of his mastery over the delicate art of short fiction writing. The plot is probably familiar to most people: businessman Robert Wilson’s flight home quickly turns into a sweat-soaked, pitch-black carnival ride through his own sanity after he sees a mysterious creature on the wing of the airplane.
It’s a relentless and breath-stealing story that clamps onto you like a bear trap and refuses to let go until its abrupt and maddening conclusion, when Wilson is carted away in an ambulance, and we’re left with nothing but the burden of deciding for ourselves if what happened was real or not.
In a 2002 interview with the Television Academy Foundation, Matheson recalls the idea coming to him when he was on a plane himself and imagined a man skiing on the clouds outside his window. The concept quickly turned into something far more sinister, resulting in the classic tale. The first draft provided a lot more background to Wilson’s character, following him from his office, to his house, to the airport, until finally arriving on the place. But, as Matheson describes in the story notes in Richard Matheson: Collected Stories: Volume Three: “I don’t recall if I decided or if it was one of the editors who asked me if I could get to the story sooner so I just—bang!—put him into the airplane and started from there.“*
This decision, whoever was responsible for it, helped turn “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” into the white-knuckle masterwork it is. Part of what makes the story work so well is the almost immediate leap we make into the titular nightmare. We are planted next to Wilson moments before take-off, perhaps the most exciting and nerve-wracking moment of any flight. With no time to get acquainted with our protagonist, or even find out where we’re going, it’s wheels up and there’s no getting out until the plane touches ground again. Like Wilson, we are trapped, with little to do but lay at the mercy of the events as they unfold.
When carried over to the screen, this instantaneous setup works even better, leaving little room for filler and unnecessary sub-plots. “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” is perfect for the in-and-out, almost impersonal nature of anthology television and film, which is why both adaptations work so well. Both retellings closely follow the plot, each telling its own story, while presenting a unique interpretation of the main character.
William Shatner played the first on-screen version of Wilson in a 1963 episode of The Twilight Zone, which was actually scripted by Matheson himself and directed by Richard Donner (Superman, Lethal Weapon). Straying from the source material, this version of Wilson isn’t travelling for business, but is returning home after a 6-month stay in a mental hospital, where he went after suffering a nervous breakdown. When he begins to see the creature, he tries very hard to maintain his composure and dignity, always very aware that the slightest hint of erratic behavior could land him back in the hospital.
In another divergence from the original story, Wilson is travelling with his wife, who serves as a frustratingly staunch non-believer of the goings on, and to continuously remind him of his illness. The addition of this character puts a huge burden on the audience, asking us to believe Wilson when not even his spouse will do so. It’s a fantastic change and gives the narrative a new dimension that probably wouldn’t have worked as well on the page.
This is a far cry from what we get in the second adaptation, which appeared as a segment in 1983’s Twilight Zone: The Movie. This version was also scripted by Matheson and was directed by George Miller, creator of the Mad Max series. John Lithgow (3rd Rock from the Sun, Dexter) takes the lead role here and, unlike Shather’s reserved and nuanced performance, his character is a complete neurotic mess from the beginning. John Valentine is a sweaty, tightly-wound bundle of nerves, which erases any potential for credibility and makes it even more difficult for the crew to believe his story. Lithgow dives right into the role, executing the paranoia and madness perfectly.
Both versions also differ greatly in the design of the monster and this is where the movie version definitely overshadows the TV one. In the Television Academy interview, Matheson describes how he disliked the 1963 costume, referring to it as “a wooly bear”. And he’s certainly not wrong. The 1963 monster is awkward and apelike with a very obvious man-in-suit quality to it. The 1983 version, on the other hand, is a lot scarier and much more worthy of the source material.
By scripting both adaptations himself, Matheson was free to take the protagonist and the plot itself into new directions, allowing him to expand on his original vision and break the plot out of its shell. The most significant change Matheson makes, however, comes at the very end. In the original story, the plane is forced to land after Wilson throws open the emergency hatch in an effort to get the creature off of the wing. Afterward, Wilson is hauled off in an ambulance, and it’s up to the reader to decide whether or not his vision was real. Both the 1963 and 1983 versions, however, remove all of that doubt. Matheson’s script instead calls for one final twist, in which it is revealed that the wing is severely damaged, proving to the audience and the other characters that Wilson/Valentine had been right all along and that he actually saved the plane.
This daring addition turns the story in a completely different and far more interesting direction and presents a terrifying truth—that the monster was real. In a visual medium like television, this twists works far better than the original ending, leaving no room for doubt in the audience’s mind about what really happened, but giving us something even more perplexing to ponder—what in the hell was the thing on the wing?
The scariest thing about the creature—which Matheson identifies as a gremlin–isn’t simply its desire to wreck the airplane, which in itself is deeply unsettling. It’s how much it enjoys toying with Wilson, as if it’s completely aware of the fact that the flight crew don’t believe him and is doing whatever it can to provoke him.
This bizarre cat and mouse relationship between Wilson and the gremlin is most prevalent in a 3rd, semi-official retelling of the story. As a child of the 80s and 90s, I wouldn’t be able to forgive myself if I didn’t throw a little love to this version, which is classified as a parody rather than an official adaptation. This is also the version that would have introduced the story to most people under 40 years old. 1993’s The Simpson’s: Treehouse of Horror IV featured its own micro-sized version of “Nightmare at 20,000” feet, replacing the airplane with a school bus, and Robert Wilson for Bart Simpson.
Bart Simpson, a known troublemaker and liar is the perfect pawn for the gremlin’s devious plot. It’s as if it knows that no one will believe Bart’s tall tale, allowing it poke, prod and tear at the school bus with glee, all the while smiling and almost laughing at the only person who can see it. This version of the monster is much scarier that the others because it actually acts with joy and a complete understanding of what it’s doing.
The Simpsons’ take is a worthy and delightful addition to the story’s legacy. When I asked author Richard Christian Matheson, Richard Matheson’s son, about how his father felt about The Simpsons’ handling of his work he responded simply: “He loved it.”
When the new version of The Twilight Zone was first announced in December 2017, many hoped that it would include yet another adaptation of the story. This hope was fueled last October when one of the episode titles was announced as Nightmare at 30,000 Feet. Hopes and expectations were quickly dashed, however, when the series premiered on April 1, and it became clear that the episode was a loving homage to Matheson’s work, and not an official retelling.
“Nightmare at 30,000 Feet” is a completely original story (conceived by Peele and Simon Kinberg) and offers a paranormal examination of the post-September 11th skies, where anyone could be a threat, and any hint of erratic behavior is met with suspicion and hostility. Scriptwriter Marco Ramirez and Director Greg Yaitanes deliver an intense experience, with Matheson’s influence permeating everything we see on screen. Though it’s completely gremlin-free, paranoia, mental illness, and claustrophobic terror are all on display, and Adam Scott’s performance stands tall alongside Shatner and Lithgow’s.
Whether it’s a story of man versus monster, or man versus himself, “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” pits both its protagonist and the audience against a mysterious foe that seeks not only to destroy human life, but to revel in the fear it is causing. It is a landmark in the history of horror fiction, melding mental illness, paranoia and the primal instinct for survival into a dizzying narrative that has been told and re-told for decades and will continue to inspire horror on the page and on the screen for decades to come.
* Matheson, Richard. “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet: Story Notes.” Richard Matheson: Collected Stories: Volume Three. Ed. Stanley Wiater. Colorado Springs: Gauntlet Press, 2005. 139-140. Print
Editorials
‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements
The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.
However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.
That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.
A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.
At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.
The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.
In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.
Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.
The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.
In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.
The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.
Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.
Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.
Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.
Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.





You must be logged in to post a comment.