Connect with us

Editorials

Arthouse of Horrors: The Scariest Movies on The Criterion Channel!

Published

on

The Criterion Channel made its anxiously-awaited debut this month. The new streaming service offers films from Criterion’s extensive library of classic, arthouse and cult cinema, fantastically restored and – in many cases – presented with extensive and illuminating special features.

Criterion may be best known for their prestigious releases of French New Wave and Italian Neorealist movies, but don’t let that fool you. They’ve got a weird streak a mile long, and The Criterion Channel is chockablock with horror films and other off-putting oddities that are practically too strange to quantify.

We can only scratch the surface today, but let’s take a look at some of the scariest movies on The Criterion Channel!


The Brood (1979)

The films of David Cronenberg are Criterion favorites, and two of his violent classics are already available on the service: Scanners, the head-exploding cult classic, and The Brood, which is arguably his scariest film. Oliver Reed stars as a psychiatrist using a new technique called “psychoplasmics” on his patient, played by Samantha Eggar. Meanwhile, her child is being attacked by mysterious homicidal children; how this all connects is one of the most disturbing moments in Cronenberg’s gruesome career.


Carnival of Souls (1962)

Most people don’t know the name of Herk Harvey, a prolific short filmmaker whose industrial videos about personal hygiene and social etiquette were often featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000. But although he spent most of his career making shorts like “Why Study Industrial Arts?”, he also made one feature film… and it’s considered one of the best horror movies ever made. Carnival of Souls is an independent production about a church organist, played by Candace Hilligoss, whose near-fatal accident left her with ghostly, ominous visions, and those visions linger long after the movie reaches its conclusion.


Cronos (1993)

Guillermo Del Toro’s first feature film, a vampiric fairy tale about a grandfather transforming into a monster, is still one of his finest achievements. Cronos stars the great Federico Luppi as an antique dealer whose latest discovery, a windup scarab with a sharp proboscis, turns him into a blood-licking vampire, and sets him at odds with a dying millionaire who will stop at nothing to steal that perverse immortality for himself. Cronos is, at turns, intimate and grand, horrifying and tender, and that bizarre balance only makes it more disturbing.


Cure (1997)

One of the most terrifying films of the 1990s, Cure stars Kōji Yakusho as a police detective investigating a series of baffling murders, all of them perpetrated by people who have no idea why they did it. At the center of it all is a curious sort of man, played by Masato Hagiwara, who wanders into people’s lives, speaks to them in puzzling ways, and lights a Zippo lighter. Directed with Kubrickian intensity by Kiyoshi Kurosawa, Cure uses subtle visual and audio techniques to lull us into a shocking trance.


Eyes Without a Face (1960)

Stylish and ghoulish, Georges Franju’s horror classic Eyes Without a Face stars Pierre Brasseur as a brilliant plastic surgeon whose daughter, played by Édith Scob, is horribly disfigured in an accident. He begins a search for the perfect victim, whose face he intends to transplant onto his child. The grotesque storyline brims with eerie imagery, like the face in the title, a featureless mask that would go on to inspire the iconic appearance of Michael Myers in Halloween.


Funny Games (1997)

Funny Games appears, on the surface, to be a simple home invasion film. But as Michael Haneke’s terrifying tale continues, it becomes clear that the true horror is inside you… the audience. Arno Frisch and Frank Giering play posh teenagers who invite themselves into the vacation home of a small family, and abuse their hospitality until – before anyone really realizes it – they’re all abducted and forced into unspeakable situations. The villains aren’t just evil, they’re self-aware; they know we’re watching them, and we know we expect them to commit acts of unspeakable violence. By the time they’ve done their job, sensitive viewers won’t just feel frightened. They’ll feel guilty.


House (1977)

There aren’t a lot of horror films weirder than Nobuhiku Obayashi’s House, and that’s really, really saying something. A group of schoolgirls travel to a haunted house, where severed heads are also watermelons, pianos eat fingers, and nightmare cats leap from paintings. Their only hope – a professor slowly en route to the scene of the supernatural crime – has a fate which can only be described as, well, totally bananas. Chuck logic out the door because House will test your sanity… and to the best of knowledge, nobody has ever passed the test!


The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog (1927)

Before Alfred Hitchcock became a household name he had to make a name for himself, and the master of suspense finally found his niche with the atmospheric horror story The Lodger. The British film stars Ivor Novello as the mysterious title character, who takes a room in the middle of a serial killer’s crimewave, and whose disturbing behavior makes him the prime suspect. Made only a few decades after the real-life Jack the Ripper murders, Hitchcock’s eerie analogue is a tense masterwork, an early, silent preview of the many shocks he would eventually unleash into cinemas.


M (1931)

The first sound film by acclaimed German filmmaker Fritz Lang, M stars the impossibly creepy Peter Lorre as a serial killer whose victims are all children. His crimes are so unforgivable that the criminal underworld rises up against him, so he’s hunted on all sides. Lang resists the urge to rely on sound, even though it’s finally one of the tools available to him, and he still lets swaths of M play out in uncomfortable, terrifying silence. But he does use the technique to recontextualize “In the Hall of the Mountain King” from Edvard Grieg’s “Peer Gynt Suite No. 1” into an anthem of pure horror.


Sisters (1973)

Brian De Palma’s first Hitchcockian thriller, of many, is still deliriously disturbing. Sisters stars Margot Kidder as a model whose identical twin sister murders her boyfriend, attracting the attention of a reporter, played by Jennifer Salt, who lives across the hall and is determined to prove them guilty. Halfway between giallo and old-fashioned Hollywood murder mystery, Sisters takes one demented turn after another, weaving a stylish and unpredictable web of psychological terror and cinematic showmanship.


Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (1992)

David Lynch’s deeply disturbing prequel to his cult hit TV series “Twin Peaks” stars Sheryl Lee, in a powerhouse performance as a seemingly perfect teenager, tortured by unspeakable abuse.  The film’s harrowing portrayal of Laura Palmer’s tragic life, leading directly up to her brutal murder, would be terrifying enough on its own. But Lynch doesn’t stop there, expanding the supernatural mythology of Twin Peaks with inexplicable story elements and surreal imagery, which wouldn’t be explained until over two decades later in “Twin Peaks: The Return”. That is, if it was explained at all. The nature of reality is elusive in Lynch’s films, and never more frightening than in Fire Walk With Me.


The Vanishing (1988)

A young couple stop at a gas station, but only one of them leaves. Gene Bervoets stars as a man whose girlfriend goes missing and becomes obsessed with solving her disappearance, and Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu co-stars as the calculating sociopath who begins stalking our hero. George Sluizer would go on to remake The Vanishing in English, in a version starring Kiefer Sutherland and Jeff Bridges, but the American version turns the terrifying finale into something rousing and false. The original is where the real terror is at.


Vengeance is Mine (1979)

One of the greatest, yet underappreciated serial killer movies, Shōhei Imamura’s Vengeance is Mine stars Ken Ogata as a monstrous human being, who slaughters his way through life, coldly and without consideration or remorse. The film teeters between engrossing crime drama and an objective exploration of the shallowness of evil, and Ken Ogata’s performance is one for the ages: an unforgettably despicable man, the likes of which have rarely been brought to such off-puttingly realistic life.

William Bibbiani writes film criticism in Los Angeles, with bylines at The Wrap, Bloody Disgusting and IGN. He co-hosts three weekly podcasts: Critically Acclaimed (new movie reviews), The Two-Shot (double features of the best/worst movies ever made) and Canceled Too Soon (TV shows that lasted only one season or less). Member LAOFCS, former Movie Trivia Schmoedown World Champion, proud co-parent of two annoying cats.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading