Connect with us

Editorials

[Editorial] Why The Invisible Man is the Most Underrated Universal Monster

Published

on

So… I have a confession to make. For the longest time, I thought that the Invisible Man was a wimp compared to the other Universal Monsters. Sure, I’ve always admired his iconic shades and general sense of style, but how the hell do you pair up Lovecraftian fish-people, undead abominations and tragic lycanthropes with a regular guy who just so happens to be invisible? Well, after years of avoiding this seemingly inferior “monster”, I finally got around to reading H.G. Wells‘ classic story and watching James Whale‘s 1933 adaptation of it (not to mention the subsequent sequels), and boy was I wrong!

Having seen the error of my ways, I feel that I owe The Invisible Man an apology, so here’s my attempt at explaining why I now consider him the most underrated of all the Universal Monsters!

Despite a few notable alterations (mostly attempts at making the titular character less of an irredeemable fiend), Universal’s first adaptation of The Invisible Man is surprisingly faithful to the source material. Much of this is due to Wells’ mastery of storytelling, using universal archetypes to spin an iconic yarn of mad science gone wrong, while also having fun with the sci-fi concept of invisibility. That makes this haunting tale quite easy to adapt into nearly any environment or time period without losing much of its impact, as the story deals with timeless concepts like the dangers of anonymity and man’s relationship with power.

Whale’s film actually injects a little bit more comedy into the mix, though it also makes Griffin more of a tragic figure by including a heartbroken fiancé and the fact that the main character’s apparent madness mostly stems from the invisibility formula and not necessarily from an inherent lust for power. However, it was only with the addition of Claude Rains‘ unforgettable performance that the character was truly transformed into one of fiction’s most notorious psychopaths.

Rains simply kills it through voice acting and body language.

Following in the tradition of complex horror protagonists like Victor Frankenstein, Dr. Jack Griffin’s uncontrolled ambition is the true monster here, with his reprehensible behavior making him inhuman, not the lack of a visible body. Over the course of the story, Jack distances himself so deeply from the human condition that murder no longer phases him and anything can be excused if it serves his megalomaniacal goals. In fact, The Invisible Man technically has one of, if not the, largest body count in all of the Universal Monster pictures. This is mostly due to one terrifying scene where Jack derails a speeding train, possibly murdering hundreds of innocent travelers just because he could!

However, the character is so much more than just a crazed killer. While some of his quirks may have originally been played for laughs, it doesn’t take a genius to imagine his invisible antics serving as the terrifying foundation for a modern haunted house story. Ghostly mutterings in the night, objects moving by themselves and unseen presences stalking innocent victims; it’s the stuff of nightmares! To me, an ultimate reveal that the evil entity was a crazed human the entire time seems much more horrifying than a simple spirit.

Couple these phantasmagorical shenanigans with a sadistic streak and delusions of grandeur (even featuring classic supervillain speeches about making the world grovel at his feet), and you have the recipe for one of fiction’s most compelling characters. It would actually be a while before we’d see this kind of madness again in film, especially after the Hays code, but The Invisible Man would become a franchise willing to reinvent itself with each new installment. While the original flick was a cautionary tale of sci-fi horror with a sprinkling of slapstick, the sequels would incorporate genre-bending elements to the story in order to keep the formula from getting stale.

The Invisible Man Returns is much more of a murder mystery as Vincent Price tracks down his brother’s killer using his newfound abilities, while The Invisible Woman would present itself as a screwball comedy, abandoning most of the story’s horror elements. My personal favorite of the bunch, Invisible Agent, was an insane propaganda flick chronicling the adventures of a new Invisible Man tasked with spying on the Nazis during World War II in a proto-superhero movie! Of all of these, The Invisible Man’s Revenge is arguably the most similar to the original, again featuring a psychopathic killer, though he still pales in comparison to Rains’ original Jack Griffin.

Getting a Hollow Man vibe from these effects!

Naturally, not all of these different interpretations were successful, but they can all serve as inspiration for even better adaptations in the future. The way I see it, the ideal Invisible Man film would incorporate elements from all these previous versions in a revamping of this classic monster, though I’d love it for a new creative team to dial the scare-factor up to eleven.

That’s why I can hardly wait for 2020 and Leigh Whannell‘s take on this iconic character. After seeing Upgrade, I’m pretty sure he’s one of only a few filmmakers able to tell a proper sci-fi horror story without skimping out on the brutality or clever nuances that made the original story such a classic in the first place.

At this point, I think it’s clear that The Invisible Man is one of the most versatile properties out there, able to effortlessly transition between genres while still maintaining an echo of the original story’s horrific elements. Even when the character is reimagined as a hero, there’s an inherently creepy voyeuristic element that can’t really be removed, not to mention the ever-present temptation to use these abilities for personal gain.

These days, The Invisible Man is right up there with The Wolfman as one of my all-time favorite movie monsters. It took a while for me to appreciate the value of this timeless character, but I’m glad that I did. If the age-old adage is true, and the deepest scares lie in the unknown, I feel that there’s no better story to revive through the lens of contemporary horror than the unseen terrors of the unforgettable Invisible Man.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading