Editorials
[Editorial] Why The Invisible Man is the Most Underrated Universal Monster
So… I have a confession to make. For the longest time, I thought that the Invisible Man was a wimp compared to the other Universal Monsters. Sure, I’ve always admired his iconic shades and general sense of style, but how the hell do you pair up Lovecraftian fish-people, undead abominations and tragic lycanthropes with a regular guy who just so happens to be invisible? Well, after years of avoiding this seemingly inferior “monster”, I finally got around to reading H.G. Wells‘ classic story and watching James Whale‘s 1933 adaptation of it (not to mention the subsequent sequels), and boy was I wrong!
Having seen the error of my ways, I feel that I owe The Invisible Man an apology, so here’s my attempt at explaining why I now consider him the most underrated of all the Universal Monsters!
Despite a few notable alterations (mostly attempts at making the titular character less of an irredeemable fiend), Universal’s first adaptation of The Invisible Man is surprisingly faithful to the source material. Much of this is due to Wells’ mastery of storytelling, using universal archetypes to spin an iconic yarn of mad science gone wrong, while also having fun with the sci-fi concept of invisibility. That makes this haunting tale quite easy to adapt into nearly any environment or time period without losing much of its impact, as the story deals with timeless concepts like the dangers of anonymity and man’s relationship with power.
Whale’s film actually injects a little bit more comedy into the mix, though it also makes Griffin more of a tragic figure by including a heartbroken fiancé and the fact that the main character’s apparent madness mostly stems from the invisibility formula and not necessarily from an inherent lust for power. However, it was only with the addition of Claude Rains‘ unforgettable performance that the character was truly transformed into one of fiction’s most notorious psychopaths.

Rains simply kills it through voice acting and body language.
Following in the tradition of complex horror protagonists like Victor Frankenstein, Dr. Jack Griffin’s uncontrolled ambition is the true monster here, with his reprehensible behavior making him inhuman, not the lack of a visible body. Over the course of the story, Jack distances himself so deeply from the human condition that murder no longer phases him and anything can be excused if it serves his megalomaniacal goals. In fact, The Invisible Man technically has one of, if not the, largest body count in all of the Universal Monster pictures. This is mostly due to one terrifying scene where Jack derails a speeding train, possibly murdering hundreds of innocent travelers just because he could!
However, the character is so much more than just a crazed killer. While some of his quirks may have originally been played for laughs, it doesn’t take a genius to imagine his invisible antics serving as the terrifying foundation for a modern haunted house story. Ghostly mutterings in the night, objects moving by themselves and unseen presences stalking innocent victims; it’s the stuff of nightmares! To me, an ultimate reveal that the evil entity was a crazed human the entire time seems much more horrifying than a simple spirit.
Couple these phantasmagorical shenanigans with a sadistic streak and delusions of grandeur (even featuring classic supervillain speeches about making the world grovel at his feet), and you have the recipe for one of fiction’s most compelling characters. It would actually be a while before we’d see this kind of madness again in film, especially after the Hays code, but The Invisible Man would become a franchise willing to reinvent itself with each new installment. While the original flick was a cautionary tale of sci-fi horror with a sprinkling of slapstick, the sequels would incorporate genre-bending elements to the story in order to keep the formula from getting stale.
The Invisible Man Returns is much more of a murder mystery as Vincent Price tracks down his brother’s killer using his newfound abilities, while The Invisible Woman would present itself as a screwball comedy, abandoning most of the story’s horror elements. My personal favorite of the bunch, Invisible Agent, was an insane propaganda flick chronicling the adventures of a new Invisible Man tasked with spying on the Nazis during World War II in a proto-superhero movie! Of all of these, The Invisible Man’s Revenge is arguably the most similar to the original, again featuring a psychopathic killer, though he still pales in comparison to Rains’ original Jack Griffin.

Getting a Hollow Man vibe from these effects!
Naturally, not all of these different interpretations were successful, but they can all serve as inspiration for even better adaptations in the future. The way I see it, the ideal Invisible Man film would incorporate elements from all these previous versions in a revamping of this classic monster, though I’d love it for a new creative team to dial the scare-factor up to eleven.
That’s why I can hardly wait for 2020 and Leigh Whannell‘s take on this iconic character. After seeing Upgrade, I’m pretty sure he’s one of only a few filmmakers able to tell a proper sci-fi horror story without skimping out on the brutality or clever nuances that made the original story such a classic in the first place.
At this point, I think it’s clear that The Invisible Man is one of the most versatile properties out there, able to effortlessly transition between genres while still maintaining an echo of the original story’s horrific elements. Even when the character is reimagined as a hero, there’s an inherently creepy voyeuristic element that can’t really be removed, not to mention the ever-present temptation to use these abilities for personal gain.
These days, The Invisible Man is right up there with The Wolfman as one of my all-time favorite movie monsters. It took a while for me to appreciate the value of this timeless character, but I’m glad that I did. If the age-old adage is true, and the deepest scares lie in the unknown, I feel that there’s no better story to revive through the lens of contemporary horror than the unseen terrors of the unforgettable Invisible Man.
Editorials
Taking a Closer Look at the ‘Christmas Carol’ Ghosts of Ti West’s ‘Ebenezer’
The trailer for Ti West’s upcoming adaptation of A Christmas Carol raised a lot of eyebrows when it dropped earlier this week. While plenty of folks initially dismissed Ebenezer as a derivative project meant to cash in on the recent wave of unnecessary prequels that expand the backstory of beloved characters (such as 2023’s Wonka), Charles Dickens’ original novel already made a point of exploring Ebenezer Scrooge’s origins in detail – meaning that this new film is likely just a particularly faithful adaptation of the source material under a different name.
Couple that with the fact that the movie is being helmed by a genuine horror auteur and I think it’s safe to say that the latest iteration of the first modern ghost story is in good hands.
That being said, one detail that immediately jumped out at me during the brief teaser (other than a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it nod to Johnny Depp’s iconic bedroom death scene from the original A Nightmare on Elm Street) is the fact that many of Ebenezer’s ghosts appear to have been directly lifted from the iconic John Leech illustrations that accompanied the first edition of Dickens’ novel.
Here are a couple of stills from the trailer compared to the original artwork:

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

The Phantoms in ‘A Christmas Carol’ and ‘Ebenezer’

Marley’s Ghost in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’
Mainly working with old-school wood and steel engravings that would later be transferred to print, Leech was instrumental in crafting the iconic look of history’s most influential phantoms – especially since Dickens is said to have been deeply involved with the creation of these so-called “comic illustrations.”
And since the novel is commonly said to have popularized spiritualism in Victorian England, much of the ghostly iconography that we still see in genre media to this very day (including some of Ti West’s previous films) can be traced back to the author’s partnership with Leech.
Ebenezer won’t be the first A Christmas Carol adaptation to borrow heavily from these designs, but I can appreciate how Ti West is incorporating an important part of horror history into his latest film.
Ebenezer will be available in theaters starting November 13.

You must be logged in to post a comment.