Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

[Editorial] ‘Halloween Ends’ and Horror’s Love Affair With “Final Chapters”

Published

on

For a genre so heavy on gruesome death, horror certainly struggles with endings.

Horror franchises often simply refuse to die, extending infinitely into the future. This is certainly true of the Halloween series. Since it started in 1978 with John Carpenter’s undoubted slasher classic Halloween, the bedlam in Haddonfield has extended over four decades, with Michael Myers apparently dying on many occasions, only to emerge from the ashes with a kitchen knife in his hand. At the recent San Diego Comic-Con, Blumhouse unveiled two more movies in the spooky saga, following up the 2018 franchise reboot. Halloween Kills will arrive in 2020, followed by Halloween Ends in 2021.

It’s the second one of these that’s most interesting, suggesting that it will bring the franchise to a close – 43 years after it first graced cinema screens. But horror doesn’t like to say goodbye that easily. 

The trend for declaring horror franchises to be dead, before reanimating them into a shambling, undead version of themselves is something that dates back many years. Perhaps the first example of the phenomenon is 1984’s Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter, which was the fourth entry in a franchise that now comprises a dozen movies in total. At the time, Paramount Pictures was acutely aware of the declining popularity of slasher films and used the title as a marketing hook for a movie that was genuinely intended to be the climactic entry.

Friday the 13th The Final Chapter

In what would become a trend for movies billed as “final chapters”, Friday made solid money at the box office. It tripled its budget and still sits as the fifth highest-grossing movie in the entire series. Not even a year later, they went back to the well with another outing for Jason Voorhees’ hockey mask, albeit with someone else behind it. Less than a decade after that, in 1993, Paramount sold the franchise rights to New Line Cinema for Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday. This one didn’t get the same box office bump and did put an end to the franchise for a good few years until Jason X in 2001.

That box office spike is a crucial reason why the gimmick of finality so often rears its head in successful horror franchises. 2009’s The Final Destination remains the highest-grossing entry in that particular series, while Resident Evil: The Final Chapter raked in $312m globally in 2017 – the franchise’s best total to date. Sure enough, neither of these films are truly final. Final Destination 5 hit cinemas in 2011 and a reboot of the Resident Evil franchise is currently being developed, with 47 Meters Down director Johannes Roberts on board as writer-director. The reboot was announced just four months after The Final Chapter was released.

It’s not always a foolproof strategy, though. Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare, which was released in 1991, reversed the disappointing box office decline of the fifth Elm Street movie, but did not hit the heights of the third and fourth installment. When Robert Englund’s iconic serial killer made his return for the meta New Nightmare, the box office plummeted, but the crossover event of Freddy vs. Jason in 2003 returned him to franchise-high takings, leaving the supposed “final nightmare” in the dust. 

As with the first supposedly definitive Friday the 13th franchise closer, the idea of labeling a movie as final is sometimes done out of pure commercial necessity. Sometimes people are just tired of seeing a franchise over and over again, but might see one more if it means they never have to return to that world. Certainly, many will be hoping that The Last Sharknado marks the final time they have to see Tara Reid as a shark-slaying cyborg…right?

This was the case with 2010’s Saw: The Final Chapter – also known as Saw 3D. Lionsgate had originally planned a two-part finale for the franchise, but rolled all of the ideas into one movie after the miserable box office performance of Saw VI – well in excess of the gradual decline that had been playing out at the multiplex since Saw III featured John Kramer’s death by power saw. 

The gambit didn’t necessarily pay off, with The Final Chapter beating the meager box office of its predecessor, but falling below even the total of the first Saw movie in 2004 domestically. When the franchise returned with Jigsaw in 2017, it was yet another step back, with that film landing considerably short of The Final Chapter. With Chris Rock and Samuel L. Jackson on board for yet another revamp though, rumors of Saw‘s death have certainly been greatly exaggerated.

While delivering a supposed “final chapter” is a commonly used marketing ploy to inject life into a flagging horror franchise, it’s clear that it isn’t always a success. Genre audiences are wise and cynical enough now to see through the transparent fiction that such titles often prove to be. No one will be surprised if another Sharknado is announced, or if Tom Six decides to return with a follow-up to The Human Centipede 3 (Final Sequence), despite the promise in its title.

So on that note, will Halloween Ends actually mark the last of Michael Myers? The honest answer is that it probably won’t.

In fact, Danny McBride – co-writer of the 2018 Halloween and the upcoming sequels – has already declared his own certainty that their movies will not be the final outings for Michael Myers and the Halloween universe. He told SlashFilm that there is “no way” their films will mark the end and said that “10 years from now there’ll be another group of knuckleheads” who will put together their take on the series. 

The more things change, the more they stay the same. And that’s the final word on this.

Or is it?

Click to comment

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading