Editorials
The 8 Best Portrayals of Frankenstein’s Monster in Film and Television
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a literary classic now over 200 years old.
The story of a mad scientist creating a monster stitched together from various body parts has contributed to one of horror’s most enduring monsters. With it, two centuries of plays, movies, and television adaptations. Some adhering close to the material and some making major changes to make the story their own.
Whether tragic, sympathetic, or flat out terrifying, these 8 portrayals of Frankenstein’s monster are the best.
Frankenstein – Boris Karloff

Arguably the most iconic take on the character, Karloff’s performance in Frankenstein launched him into stardom at the age of 43. Understandably so. Karloff only played the monster in three films, yet it’s his portrayal that’s often considered the definitive version. His large, lumbering movements perfectly capture an assembled undead monster trying to work his way through limited motor skills, complete with his trademark grunts and groans. Karloff plays the monster as both naïve and intimidating, and it works like a charm.
“The Munsters” – Fred Gwynne

In all the versions of this character, Herman Munster received the happy ending not usually afforded. It is a sitcom, after all. Created in 1815 by Dr. Victor Frankenstein, Herman eventually found his way to Transylvania where he met and fell in love with Lily Dracula. From there, the pair moved to America, and he served in the U.S. Army during World War II. In other words, nothing at all like the source novel. Gwynne was effortlessly affable, which translated well to Herman Munster, a lovable oaf with childlike behavior. And a doting family man, no less. This Munster will charm the pants off of you.
The Curse of Frankenstein – Christopher Lee

Hammer’s take on Mary Shelley’s classic tale is far more gruesome and bloodier, and far removed from the revered Universal classic iteration. Peter Cushing’s Victor Frankenstein wants to give his monster intelligence, so he seeks out a professor and murders him for his brain. Victor’s assistant gets cold feet on the project and tries to stop him, damaging the brain in the process. That creates a violent and psychotic Creature (Christopher Lee) when it’s brought to life. Lee continues the mute, lumbering aspect of the character, but he’s far less sympathetic and much more monstrous here.
Young Frankenstein – Peter Boyle

It wasn’t just Frankenstein that Mel Brooks was parodying here, though it was the main focus. Gene Wilder played a descendant of Victor Frankenstein, with Peter Boyle as his Monster. Being that this is a Brooks comedy, Young Frankenstein is full of over the top gags, slapstick, and plenty of dirty jokes. Including that Frankenstein may have been very generous with the parts he used to assemble the Monster. Boyle, for his part, keeps the trademark movement, shuffling walk and all, but he gets much more to do – like a musical number.
The Monster Squad – Tom Noonan

This childhood favorite gave Frankenstein’s monster another chance to redo that infamous scene from the 1931 film, in which the monster accidentally drowns the little girl who tries to befriend him. In this outing, he forges a beautiful friendship with young Phoebe, and it provides the emotional heartbeat of a movie that pits preteens against Universal’s classic monsters. This time, Frankenstein’s monster gets to be a hero. Tom Noonan’s performance is so enchanting and heartbreaking. His parting shot in the film gets me every time. Bogus.
Frankenhooker – Patty Mullen

Very, very loosely inspired by Mary Shelley’s novel, Frank Henenlotter’s Frankenhooker has all the wacky humor you’d expect and more. When Jeffrey’s fiancée Elizabeth Shelley (get it?) is killed in a lawnmower accident, he decides to bring her back to life. Since most of her parts were shredded to bits, he harvests needed parts from NYC hookers. Meaning that when Elizabeth is resurrected, her instinctual drive is to go seek out customers. Wanna date? Mullen’s signature twitches and her stiff walk as she wanders the streets in search of clientele is a hoot.
“Penny Dreadful” – Rory Kinnear

The first creation of Victor Frankenstein, the Creature was abandoned straightaway, leaving him to figure out his strange existence on his own. This means he has a lot of lingering resentment toward his maker, but endless compassion for others. Even the cruel ones… and boy can the world be cruel. This take on the creature fits closer to the description in Mary Shelley’s novel, but Rory Kinnear- and the series- allows for a much deeper exploration of the character’s pathos. And the result is extremely riveting and poignant. I miss this show.
Depraved – Alex Breaux

Larry Fessenden returns to the director’s chair with this modern update to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. And with it, a very thoughtful approach to the relationship between the mad scientist and his creation. In this version, the creature’s creator, a PTSD suffering field surgeon named Henry (David Call) never abandons his creation. He names him Adam (Alex Breaux), and spends a lengthy span of time teaching motor skills, language skills, and normal daily functions so Adam can survive in civilization. This is a Frankenstein style story so things go awry, naturally, but this time Adam has an easier time articulating his confusion, naivety, and inner pain. It’s a unique and emotionally gripping journey, and Breaux brings it
Editorials
André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies
In this day and age, the word “troll” is often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.
It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shouts “troll” at the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.
For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.
The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.
As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?
Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.
Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.
There is always a small risk whenever using the term “mockumentary” to describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.
In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.
Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.
Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we call “found footage“.

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.
You must be logged in to post a comment.