Connect with us

Editorials

100 Years of Horror: Celebrating the Brilliance of German Expressionism in ‘The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari’

Published

on

On both a technical and narrative level, it is remarkable to look back at the evolution of cinema. Throughout the years, filmmakers have been pushing the medium to deliver intimate and exciting stories. Whereas movies used to be silent and in black and white, nowadays we have epic cinematic universes brimming with CGI. As we continue into a new decade of cinema, it will always be essential to look back on the works that came before and paved the way for new and innovative films.

This sentiment is especially important when considering horror cinema; out of all the genres, horror has always been at the forefront of depicting tales essential to the human condition. Horror has always aimed to explore the taboo and encourage audiences to question the world around them. From Night of The Living Dead to Rosemary’s Baby and Hereditary, horror has continued to evolve and capture the minds of millions.

I bring all of this up because this year marks a special anniversary for one of the first profound horror pictures in all of film history.

This February is the 100th anniversary of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari.

Released back in 1920, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari is a German silent film directed by Robert Wiene and written by Hans Janowitz and Carl Mayer. Presented as a framed narrative told by the protagonist Francis, the film focuses on the mystery surrounding the crazed hypnotist Dr. Caligari and his somnambulist Cesare; a somnambulist, or somnambulism, is used to describe a state between sleep and being awake. Francis decides to investigate Caligari and Cesare, the plot eventually revealing the evil intent behind both. As the narrative nears its end, Cesare ends up dead and Caligari is committed to an insane asylum.

But (spoilers ahead) all is not what it seems. In reality, the framed narrative is a fabrication made up by Francis, who is actually an inmate at the asylum. Another reveal is that the supposedly evil Dr. Caligari is the asylum’s director, and other characters like Cesare and Francis’ wife Jane, are also inmates in the asylum. 

In his 2009 review of the film, the late Roger Ebert said that a case could be made for The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari being one of “the first true horror films.” Prior to the release of Caligari, many horror films revolved around gothic fantasies and the supernatural; in the world of horror movies, Caligari is one of the first major leaps into psychological horror, exploring such themes as duality and the perception of reality. 

As a whole, Caligari involves an interesting dynamic in point-of-view; given the twist that Francis is not sane, the audience spends the majority of the film believing his story, only to have the rug pulled from under them. When looking back on the film, this sense of disconnection adds a layer of mystique to the film’s dream-like quality. In exploring these concepts, the film has gone on to inspire filmmakers to expand upon these themes in greater detail. An incredible example of a more contemporary film pulling inspiration from Caligari is that of Martin Scorsese’s Shutter Island; like how Francis creates his own narrative, where he is the hero and the asylum doctor is the villain, so too does Leonardo DiCaprio’s character when confronting his own insanity.

Along with its theatrical frights and mystery, Caligari is also a film of remarkable visuals. As an important contribution to German expressionist cinema, Caligari encompasses a surreal atmosphere, utilizing effective lighting and unusual setting. Through its use of shadows and design, the environment of Caligari is made of sharp edges that spring up to form ominous structures. The characters move about their day as if everything is normal, but to the audience, the designs are otherworldly, presenting a jarring presentation. Because of these details, the film has since become a major example of captivating and chilling imagery.

Caligari is also a remarkable film of political reflection. The film examines such concepts as authority and conformity, while presenting a reflection on post-war Germany.

Both Janowitz and Mayer were pacifists who met after World War I; given their experiences with the war, both men came to distrust the German military and government, with said distrust making its way into the figures of Dr. Caligari and Cesare. In his 1947 book, From Caligari to Hitler: A Psychological History of the German Film, Siegfried Kracauer states that Caligari is symbolic of the unlimited authority and idolizing of power displayed by the German war government. John D. Barlow, who wrote German Expressionist Film (1982), shares a similar sentiment, stating that Caligari is the tyrannical power that had plagued Germany at the time, with Cesare representing the citizen conditioned into obedience.

There are several details in the film that align with these thematic concepts. Through the framed narrative of Francis’ point-of-view, he and the viewer come to recognize Caligari as an evil madman with terrifying power, and Cesare as a murderous being. Before the plot twist is presented, Francis discovers that Caligari runs the nearby asylum, shocking him that an authority figure could be responsible for such villainy.

In exploring the political and societal struggles taking place within the country at the time, Caligari made for a profound look at Germany (and makes for a film of historical significance today). Caligari serves to digest a real world horror; through its imaginative narrative, the viewer is able to grasp concepts of tyranny and corrupt authoritarian ideals. As a film with such rich context, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari is a brilliant marriage between the need to create art and to express struggle. 

In the years since its release, Caligari has become a classic. Studied in various film classes, it represents some of the earliest strengths to emerge from the horror genre. The film’s technical creativity has gone on to inspire filmmakers in creating surreal, grim settings that elevate emotion; its efforts to examine psychology have inspired storytellers to venture further into the horrors of the mind. Equally as important, the film’s reflection of real world issues has become an essential element of the horror genre; today, horror still continues to be the leading artform in confronting the problems in our world.

As such an amazing medium that has impacted so many of our lives, it’s incredible to see how far horror cinema has come. With all the new and fascinating horror movies coming out each year, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari is still fondly spoken of among the horror community. Even in 2020, the film still contains an element of eeriness; it provides an air of unease, slowly stirring its viewer into a nightmare.

Here we are 100 years later – not only is The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari one of the most influential pictures in the horror genre, it also stands as a monumental cornerstone of film history.

Michael Pementel is a pop culture critic at Bloody Disgusting, primarily covering video games and anime. He writes about music for other publications, and is the creator of Bloody Disgusting's "Anime Horrors" column.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading