Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘Child’s Play 2’ Is a Perfect Example of What a Horror Sequel Should Be [We Love ’90s Horror]

Published

on

child's play 2

The ‘90s often get a bad rap with horror fans. After the numerous successful slashers and creature effects films of the ’80s, the ‘90s offered a different variety of horror fare. Though there were plenty of hits, hidden gems, and misunderstood classics, the ‘90s usually don’t get the kind of love that other decades get when it comes to horror. It’s time to change that.

Time to confess something that might cause me to lose some horror cred…

I’ve never been that crazy about Child’s Play.

Don’t get me wrong. The 1988 killer doll movie is by no means a bad flick. It’s got tight direction, solid performances, and impressive special effects. My main gripe with Child’s Play has always been that the opening of the film makes a lot of the movie’s attempts at mystery a touch inert. We know it’s a killer doll flick, and the time it takes for the movie to really let loose as such is a tad tedious.

But, maybe my feelings for the original Child’s Play have always been colored by Child’s Play 2. Because Child’s Play 2 is downright phenomenal.

Thanks to the success of the first film, creator/screenwriter Don Mancini is allowed to go full tilt with the premise. Chucky is rebuilt and ready to track down Andy (Alex Vincent) in order to claim his body through some of that sweet voodoo magic.

Right from the opening titles, Child’s Play 2 feels bolder and bigger than its predecessor. The reconstruction of Chucky is shot with such twisted admiration for the character. Director Jon Lafia loves the psychotic plaything and every shot of Chucky in this flick feels iconic. Now that we know Chucky is out in the open, there is no attempt to hide the monster. Instead, Lafia wants to show off the improved effects by Kevin Yagher and his crew. And boy howdy, the effects in Child’s Play 2 are dynamite. Every animatronic emotes and the dolls altogether stop feeling like puppets. In the sequel, Chucky is a full-blown character in ways that the original film just couldn’t achieve due to technological limitations.

However, Chucky wouldn’t be who he is without an all-timer vocal performance from Brad Dourif. Dourif was an enormous part of why Chucky worked so well in Child’s Play, and the sequel allows him to go even wilder with the character. He relishes every line with such evil delight, and since the movie isn’t hindered by having to play coy with the character, Dourif is allowed to get a lot more time as Chucky. It’s this prominence and fun with the character that takes Chucky from being a one-off villain to a true franchise horror movie icon.

Plus, the rest of the cast is more than game for this second outing. Alex Vincent turns in his best performance as Andy in Child’s Play 2. Now that he knows Chucky is evil and alive, he has a more tragic role to play and he does it well. And the addition of his new foster sister Kyle, played to perfection by Christine Elise, gives Andy a different dynamic as well. Elise is perfect as the rebellious Kyle, and the relationship she builds with Andy gives the movie a genuine heart. Add to the mix genre stalwarts like Jenny Agutter, Gerrit Graham, Beth Grant, and Grace Zabriskie and the small but formidable cast delivers the goods.

But I have to return to the effects and the production polish of Child’s Play 2 because they are a high watermark for the franchise and the decade. The climax takes place in a Good Guys factory and it’s one of the best horror climaxes of the ‘90s. Chucky is torn apart and mangled in so many gleeful and gory ways and he keeps coming back! Even after Kyle and Andy melt him with molten plastic, he’s still kicking! They have to blow him up and oh, how I could watch that explosion on a loop for the rest of my life. It’s just… [chef’s kiss]

Child’s Play 2 is a perfect example of what a horror sequel should be. It ups the budget, spends the money in the right places, enhances our fascination with the villain, and delivers everything that made the original work while giving you something more that you didn’t expect. It’s possible that Child’s Play 2 is the best in the entire Chucky series (there’s another contender that might make its way to this column), but there is no doubt that Child’s Play 2 is a fantastic horror movie and a must-see entry for ‘90s horror.

Drew Dietsch has been professionally writing about film and entertainment for over a decade. His bylines include FANDOM -- where he was a founding contributor and Entertainment Editor -- Bloody Disgusting, SYFY WIRE, Atom Insider, CHUD, Crooked Marquee and more. He created and hosts GenreVision, a weekly film discussion show at genrevision.com.

Click to comment

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading