Connect with us

Editorials

Short-Lived ’90s Series “What a Dummy!” Imagined ‘Child’s Play’ as a Family-Friendly Sitcom [TV Terrors]

Published

on

Horror and science fiction have always been a part of the television canvas, and constant attempts have been made over the years to produce classic entertainment. Some have fallen by the wayside, while others became mainstream phenomena. With “TV Terrors,” we take a look back at the many genre efforts from the 80’s, 90’s, and 00’s, exploring some shows that became cult classics, and others that sank into obscurity.

This month, we head back to the post-Child’s Play ’90s and revisit “What a Dummy!”

  • Aired from 1990 – 1991
  • Aired in Fox Network Syndication

The eighties were all about cute talking mascots that reached down and touched the hearts of a domestic familial unit. Often times they were the classic nuclear family with three children. Whether it was mogwai, aliens, goblins, pet monsters, a Sasquatch, robotic children, or what have you, the decade almost always featured a movie or television series involving a normal suburban family living with an odd monster or being. By 1990, ALF had worn out his welcome, and ET mania was running on fumes, but that didn’t stop studios from trying to produce their own smart talking mascot living in domestic bliss with a hapless family. 

Obviously everyone had just about run out of ideas at this point, even twisting the formula of the nuclear family, but the last gasp of the gimmick came with “What a Dummy!” Starring a teenage Stephen Dorff, Annabel Armour, and Kaye Ballard, “What a Dummy!” is centered on a small family who is mourning the death of their great uncle Jackie Brannigan. Shortly after his funeral, they inherit an antique chest from their great uncle. Said chest, of course, houses a sentient ventriloquist dummy named Buzz. Buzz (voiced by Loren Freeman), with his frizzy red hair, tacky suit and bulging eyes, belonged to Jackie, once a Vaudeville performer and expert ventriloquist. 

You’d think this would be a great set up for a horror movie, but no, this is a family based television sitcom. Buzz takes a liking to the family he’s given to, and soon enough he’s meddling in their lives and causing all kinds of comedic antics. Although not horror in the strictest sense, you can imagine being a seven year old TV junkie like me and happening upon “What a Dummy!” in the middle of the day. The sitcom is absolutely baffling and bizarre, especially in the way it tries to take a ventriloquist dummy and transform him into a family friendly TV mascot. You can pin “What a Dummy!” being such a trash bag of TV entertainment on a lot of elements, but I like to think that it’s mainly the dummy who’s to blame.

There’s really just no way to argue the fact that ventriloquist dummies create genuine unease most of the time, and there’s no exception for Buzz. That’s especially true when the inadvertently creepy opening credits feature a still shot of the chest, with Buzz slowly cracking it open with his wooden hands. Whatever the mindset behind “What a Dummy!” was, it lacks a clear self awareness. The closest we get on that front is when Dorff taunts brother Cory by warning that the chest might be a gateway to hell. Alas, the show never provides a ton of insight into the mechanics and physiology of Buzz, as the writers spend a lot of the time on sitcom clichés. 

Dorff is the rebellious oldest brother Tucker, who deals with Buzz alongside his younger brother Cory, and their wise cracking little sister Maggie. The budget for “What a Dummy!” is noticeably small, so much of the set pieces are limited, while Buzz (mostly stationary save for his head) appears in various places around the house with not a lot of notice. One moment he’ll be sitting at a piano bench, the next he’s on a couch, and then he’ll be at the kitchen dinner table gazing at everyone with his bulbous eyes and cracking wise. Does he walk? Does he teleport? Does he commune with other ancient artifacts and plan to consume the body of Tucker? 

As a sitcom it’s incredibly formulaic and the jokes are stale even for 1990 as the writers are never ashamed to rely on word play, puns, and overplaying Janna Michaels’ cutesiness. There isn’t a lot of literature or press on “What a Dummy!” as the sitcom played in the middle of the day during the weekends, but there is a popular rumor that Kaye Ballard regretted co-starring in the series. Surprisingly it lasted twenty four whole episodes, and was inevitably cancelled and almost immediately faded into obscurity. 

Although it is god awful, you have to appreciate the balls of the producers trying to turn a ventriloquist dummy into a family friendly sitcom character. It’s not talked about very much these days, even by huge nineties nostalgia buffs, but it’s quite the television oddity that has to be seen to be believed.

Is It On DVD/Blu-Ray? Absolutely not. In fact, it’s very hard to find episodes of “What a Dummy!” online, in any kind of format. Even with Stephen Dorff’s name behind it, there isn’t a single episode on VHS, DVD, Blu-ray or streaming. Maybe someday someone will find a cache of episodes buried in a parking lot and release them for public consumption.

Felix is a horror, pop culture, and comic book fanatic based in The Bronx. Along with being a self published author, he also operates his blog Cinema Crazed and loves 90's nostalgia. His number one bucket list item is to visit Ireland on Halloween. Or to marry Victoria Justice. Currently undecided.

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading