Connect with us

Editorials

Abel Ferrara’s ‘Body Snatchers’ Is the Definition of a Hidden Horror Gem [We Love ’90s Horror]

Published

on

The ‘90s often get a bad rap with horror fans. After the numerous successful slashers and creature effects films of the ’80s, the ‘90s offered a different variety of horror fare. Though there were plenty of hits, hidden gems, and misunderstood classics, the ‘90s usually don’t get the kind of love that other decades get when it comes to horror. It’s time to change that.

Jack Finney’s The Body Snatchers has been adapted into a film version on four separate occasions. The 1956 and 1978 versions, both called Invasion of the Body Snatchers, were critical and financial successes. But, in 1993, another version of the story was made but ended being shuffled away by its distributor.

Simply called Body Snatchers, this newer version had already been put through the wringer before it ever hit the big screen. With numerous writing credits that include genre luminaries like Larry Cohen, Dennis Paoli, and Stuart Gordon, this update finally landed in the lap of controversial filmmaker Abel Ferrara. At the time, Ferrara’s filmography included provocative fare such as The Driller Killer, Ms. 45, King of New York, and Bad Lieutenant. Though Gordon was originally going to direct, Ferrara’s attachment – along with his longtime collaborator Nicholas St. John as yet another added screenwriter – turned Body Snatchers into something that’s downright extraordinary.

This version of the story takes place on a U.S. Army base in Alabama where the familiar pod people have infiltrated the military. Our protagonist is a teenage girl named Marti (Gabrielle Anwar) who has moved to the community on the base with her father Steve (Terry Kinney), her stepmother Carol (Meg Tilly), and her little brother Andy (Reilly Murphy). She’s accosted by a fleeing soldier who tells her something is wrong and soon Marti discovers the horrifying truth: pods from outer space are duplicating humans and replacing them in order to take over the planet.

It’s a story that we’re deeply familiar with thanks to previous iterations, but Body Snatchers understands just how rich the material is for allegory and metaphor. Ferrara milks this in almost every shot of the film, using the incredibly talented Bojan Bazelli – cinematographer of A Cure for Wellness, one of the best shot movies of the last decade – to emphasize shadows and silhouettes in a number of beautifully loaded frames. Body Snatchers oozes with mood at every turn, making the paranoia of the premise that much stronger. This entire article could be dedicated to just praising the cinematography of the film alone.

But, it’s not just how Body Snatchers looks that makes it a winner. The entire cast is doing great work here. So many moments stand out. Reilly Murphy’s strong reactions to his growing suspicions that everyone is all the same. A powerfully shot romantic moment between Gabrielle Anwar and her love interest, Tim (Billy Wirth) where they play a game of I’ve Never. Forest Whitaker confronting a group of pod people in a defiant last stand. All of these are impactful moments. However, the standout performance comes from Meg Tilly when Carol’s duplicate tries to convince Steve to give in to the pods. It’s one of the most chilling moments in any horror film from the ‘90s, emphasizing the futility of resistance.

Just watch as Meg Tilly delivers a monologue that should be way more heralded than it currently is:

And if these elements weren’t enough to make Body Snatchers stand out from the crowd, the creature fun of it all is expertly delivered. We get a phenomenal sequence where the pods are beginning to replicate Marti and Steve, but they wake up before the duplicates can be finished. Seeing the creation of the pod people and watching the heroes be confronted with their doubles leads to some shocking horror that rivals similar moments from the ‘56 and ‘78 versions. While it’s tough to call Body Snatchers an outright creature feature, the alien elements are wonderfully executed and will make any fan of practical effects more than happy.

Like all of the riffs on Jack Finney’s story, Body Snatchers is overflowing with elements to deeply analyze. Shifting the story to a military base immediately coats the entire story with a fear of authority and particularly a distrust of armed forces in power. The casting of R. Lee Ermey as the base’s commanding officer is knowingly sly, and when it’s revealed that he’s a pod person (and may have been all along), it gives added weight to imagery we saw earlier like the American flag being lowered against a doom-filled sunset. There are reads in the film that involve race, the decline of American exceptionalism, and the unease about how adults run the world and do a poor job of it. Even more reads are valid because Body Snatchers is deliberate in its desire to be thematically meaty. It’s got a lot on its mind and that makes it worth revisiting to see new parts of the metaphor reveal themselves.

More than anything, Body Snatchers captures an all-around great sense of uncertainty and fear in an incredibly artful way. If A24 released this today, it would absolutely fit in with their approach to more arthouse riffs on genre storytelling. We recently saw Body Snatchers for the first time over at GenreVision, and it was easily one of the best films we’ve seen this entire year. Body Snatchers is an artful, slow burn, dread-filled tone piece that succeeds across the board. It’s one of the secret great movies of the ’90s and it deserves rediscovery and reappraisal.

Ferrara’s Body Snatchers stands toe-to-toe with the other beloved versions of the story and there’s an argument to be made that it’s the best of the bunch.

Drew Dietsch has been professionally writing about film and entertainment for over a decade. His bylines include FANDOM -- where he was a founding contributor and Entertainment Editor -- Bloody Disgusting, SYFY WIRE, Atom Insider, CHUD, Crooked Marquee and more. He created and hosts GenreVision, a weekly film discussion show at genrevision.com.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading