Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘Kairo’ at 20: The Digital Horrors of Social Isolation Resonate Now More Than Ever

Published

on

The dawn of the new millennium was rife with both anticipation and apprehension. For some, the internet was the Wild Wild West: a promised land of new ideas, globalization, and connectivity. For others, it was a haunted house, with untold terrors lurking beyond every virtual corner. Exacerbated by the new technologies infiltrating society, many viewed the digital as The Other—a frightening, perpetually unknown and omnipresent force of change in our lives. 

Suddenly, AIM chat rooms connected faceless strangers in intangible spaces, stoking parents’ fears that their children might be engaging with sexual predators or anonymous psychopaths hiding behind computer screens. Meanwhile, the Y2K bug, a much-dreaded computer programming flaw, brought to public consciousness the possibility of certain digital doom as the clock ticked closer to midnight on December 31, 1999. (A pervasive fear was that computer networks all over the world would abruptly crash, sending airplanes plummeting to the ground, among more nuclear horrors.) Even Furby, the holiday season must-have robotic toy of the late ‘90s, wasn’t immune to suspicion

Released in 2001, Japanese horror film Kairo captures the anxieties of the time with unnerving precision and slow-creeping dread. Set in an unusually desolate, overcast Tokyo, the Kiyoshi Kurosawa-directed film follows the converging stories of Michi and Ryosuke, two young adults, strangers to one another, whose friends and loved ones are slowly disappearing, seemingly off the face of the earth. As Michi and Ryosuke begin to unravel the mystery behind these disappearances, they discover that malevolent entities are using the internet as a portal to enter our world. 

All who encounter the unsettling cyber-spectres of Kairo (known as Pulse in English, though not to be confused with the 2006 Western remake of the same name) develop an inescapable feeling of existential despair. As each character in the film is exposed to the phantoms, they, too, eventually become ghosts of a sort, fading away until nothing is left but a black, mildewy stain where they last existed in the corporeal world. Some victims of this ghostly computer virus die via suicide, while others simply succumb, losing their will to live and vanishing from the physical plane altogether; unable to live with the deep, unavoidable loneliness they’ve been infected with. 

It’s a scary premise, outweighed only by the deep melancholy it inspires. Kurosawa’s bleak cyber-J-horror juxtaposes the spooky uncertainty surrounding the era’s burgeoning technologies with the sorrows of social withdrawal and emotional disconnect in the face of a paradoxically lonesome, hyperconnected world. And yet, the film’s thought-provoking allegories may be even more relevant to society now than they first were two decades ago. 

Kairo’s central themes — loneliness, social isolation, and interpersonal withdrawal online — parallel the state of the world and the internet today to eerie effect. We’re connected more than ever, much more than when Kairo was first released: on our touchscreen smartphones, our Twitter accounts, our Zoom video calls. Technology has made human interaction more instantaneous and convenient, bypassing the limitations of time and space. In others ways, it’s made communication more synthetic, even compulsory—something that has become more apparent in recent years.

Kairo is especially timely in the context of social distancing. While the coronavirus has kept many of us holed up in our homes for our safety and the safety of others, newer, more complex anxieties have emerged. For many, the lack of face-to-face interaction and social haptics amid stay-at-home orders feels dystopian and unnatural, while the mounting pressures to constantly interact, make ourselves available, and manage interpersonal relationships using tools like social media and video conferencing can be overwhelming. Our technological overdependence has become the abnormal new-normal, much like the tech-apocalypse that takes place in the film.

The toll of this predicament on mental health, a topic that looms over Kairo like the static whirring of a dial-up modem, has been monumental. Last year, the CDC reported that American adults were experiencing “considerably elevated adverse mental health conditions associated with COVID-19,” resulting in “increased substance use and elevated suicidal ideation.” According to the Washington Post, suicide rates have increased among certain groups over the course of the pandemic.

Suicide is a recurring element that intensifies the unrelenting gloom of Kairo. Within the first ten minutes of the film, Michi, concerned about Taguchi, a friend who has been missing for a week after promising to deliver a disk to her place of work, goes to the young man’s apartment, where she finds him in a despondent state following an encounter with a disturbing presence on his computer. While Michi is distracted, Taguchi casually grabs an ethernet cable and hangs himself, setting into motion the events of the film. Here, the gruesome tragedy of suicide represents the tangible impacts of social isolation’s effects on mental health, as well as serves as a metaphor for internet users’ withdrawal from society—a social death, if you will.

Simply existing in the digital sphere is fraught with its own unique cultural perils, not so unlike the lost souls Kairo presents. Our increased digital connection has made relationships more delicate and tense. Much like the spectral virus in Kairo, the social infection that is online harassment causes decay in digital communities. Misinformation spreads like virtual wildfire, making individuals on the web volatile, distrustful, and constantly on the defense. Others feel totally abandoned by society altogether, cast out or discarded via the trash chute of unforgiving cyber-social rejection. Young social media users and remote workers feel alienated the most, according to recent research studies and polls—ironic, considering the technologies meant to connect us may be pushing us further apart in the long run. 

The crushing weight of hopelessness in the face of perennial loneliness weighs heavily over Kairo’s near 2-hour runtime. In one of the film’s saddest scenes, Junko, a friend who has come into contact with a particularly horrifying ghost, somberly asks Michi if she’s “just going to die like this.” When Michi cheerily responds, “Of course not,” the answer is too unbearable for Junko. “That’s right then, I’ll just keep on living, all alone,” Junko quietly laments. She then silently walks off and, when Michi’s back is turned, fades away into nothingness against a wall in Michi’s apartment. 

An oppressive sense of unabating aloneness imbues Kairo with an air of unending woe—a feeling not all that different than what someone might experience after “doomscrolling” for hours on their phone late at night. In more than one scene, characters log onto a strange website that beckons, “Would you like to meet a ghost?,” where solitary, anonymous netizens linger on webcam, seemingly trapped in the dark prisons that are their own homes. It’s no surprise that everyone in Kairo lives alone, in their own isolated little apartments where even neighbors seem to have evaporated. 

“People don’t really connect, you know. We all live totally separately,” muses Harue, a computer science grad student and new friend of Ryosuke, not long before she too falls victim to her own angst. Indeed, our world is more crowded than ever, and so are our servers. Somehow, though, we feel so very alone

Twenty years later, Kairo remains one of the preeminent cyber age horror movies, having undoubtedly paved the way for films such as CAM, Unfriended, and Host. A profound digital ghost story about interpersonal connections, isolation, and social withdrawal in the 21st century, Kurosawa’s prescient film lingers long in the mind, haunting viewers much like the tragic spectres it conjures on screen. Viewed through the lens of our modern world and collective online experience, however, Kairo appears to reflect us back at ourselves—a lone, mirrored image suspended in the artificial glow of our screens, reminding us that we are the ghost in our own machine. 

If you or someone you know needs help, please visit the National Suicide Prevention Hotline website or call 1-800-273-8255.

Click to comment

Editorials

Steven Spielberg Just Directed the Scariest Scene of His Career in ‘Disclosure Day’

Published

on

Colin Firth in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

Steven Spielberg has always been conversant in the cinematic language of the horror genre, despite relatively few credits in the genre. His contributions as a writer and producer on things like Poltergeist are legendary, and films like Duel and Jaws certainly wield the horror genre in remarkable, often chilling ways. He may not be a horror filmmaker, but he knows when he needs to scare us, and he has the tools to make that happen. 

I didn’t go into Disclosure Day, Spielberg’s alien epic, expecting outright horror, and indeed the film leans much more into thrilling than frightening. This is not a horror film, but for a few minutes in the middle, much to my surprise, it became one.

Spielberg has filmed more than his fair share of scary scenes over the years, but with Disclosure Day, he directed a new contender for the scariest scene of his entire career. 

SPOILERS AHEAD for Disclosure Day!

Josh O’Connor in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

Among the various alien secrets laced throughout Disclosure Day are a trio of palm-sized rods, the color of pencil graphite. These rods, originating from another planet, can be used for a number of things, but for the purposes of this scene, the most important is “diving,” gripping the rod in one bare hand and using its power to “dive” into the mind of another person. 

The person holding the rod in this scene is Noah Scanlon (Colin Firth), head of shadowy cybersecurity firm Wordex, who is hellbent on keeping human knowledge of extraterrestrials secret from the general public. Scanlon’s trying to find whistleblower Daniel Kellner (Josh O’Connor), who’s got all of those alien secrets tucked in a backpack while he’s on the run, and while Daniel’s more experienced mind is protected from diving, his girlfriend Jane’s (Eve Hewson) is not. So, monitored by medical personnel at Wordex headquarters (diving is dangerous), Scanlon pushes his way into Jane’s mind to find the location of Daniel’s safe house. 

A telepathic invasion is scary enough on its own, but Spielberg doesn’t stop there. When Scanlon dives into Eve’s mind, he appears to her to be sitting across the kitchen table, like he’s in the room. Her bright blue eyes turn Scanlon’s dark brown, and she loses much of her control over her own body, not to mention her mind. Moments before, Daniel finally shared with her the secrets in his backpack, so Jane is shocked, conflicted, deeply vulnerable when Scanlon slips inside her head. This is not just telepathy. This is possession. 

Spielberg underscores this not just through the visual language of the scene, as Jane breaks out in a sweat and struggles to sit upright as Scanlon invades her mind, but through Jane’s background. As she revealed to Daniel earlier in the film, Jane is a former novitiate nun who left her convent when she began to question her calling. She still believes firmly in God and, more importantly, believes that perhaps proof of alien life should be kept secret from the public because, in her eyes, it would upset the entire balance of faith in the world. God is a defining factor for humankind, Jane argues, and showing humanity proof of creatures from the stars would undercut that in dangerous ways. 

This context, combined with the crucifix necklace Jane’s holding in her hand at the time of the dive, makes this scene the closest thing Spielberg will ever shoot to something out of The Exorcist. It’s not just a battle of wills, but a battle of faith. As an amoral technocrat worms his way into her memories, her beliefs, her faith, Jane turns the crucifix into a weapon, squeezing it until her hand bleeds when she discovers that a pain response can momentarily push Scanlon out of her head.

Of course, when you put a crucifix and a bloody hand together, it conjures images of stigmata. Screenwriter David Koepp pushes the allusion further by having Scanlon quote Christ on the cross to Jane by way of convincing her that she must be the one to stop Daniel by any means necessary.

It’s easy to see why this is scary, right?

On a very basic level, you have a powerful, wealthy man subduing and assaulting an innocent young woman, which is frightening enough. Then, the layers of the scene kick in. Scanlon doesn’t just assault Jane, but possesses her, seizes her memories, her knowledge, and finally her own free will, all while Jane literally clings to her faith in an effort to fight back. Disclosure Day is, among other things, a story about who has a right to the truth, and Scanlon believes that he should be the arbiter of that truth. Not just the truth as he sees it, but the truth as Jane sees it as well. If they don’t see eye to eye, he’ll make her. 

But the possession, as it turns out, cuts both ways. Using the rod to dive is, for a normal human being, an intensely strenuous process. Scanlon admits that previous attempts almost killed him, and for some members of his time, so much as touching the rod results in a near-death experience. Even accessing an unprepared mind like Jane’s takes a lot of Scanlon, and when she kicks him out by squeezing the crucifix – again, so much meaning embedded in the details here – his team holds him back and tries to offer medical intervention. But Scanlon persists, pushing them away, and keeps diving back in.

This means that Jane can’t escape him because he just won’t stop pushing back through her defenses, but it also means that each time Scanlon enters her mind, and thus the safe house, he looks more monstrous. By the end, through a combination of lighting and makeup, Firth barely looks human, conjuring up images of the possessed Father Karras at the end of The Exorcist.

Colin Firth (center, standing) in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

On a pure, visceral craft level, all of this is quite frightening, but the real trick to making this scene into Spielberg’s most terrifying lies in the more existential horror surrounding all of this. Disclosure Day is a film about the battle for the truth over extraterrestrials, but it’s also about a fight against an impossibly powerful surveillance state, the devaluing of human and alien lives in favor of some nebulous collection of assets, and the value of the individual in a world that increasingly lumps people into demographic boxes and writes them off.

In this scene, the surveillance state becomes supernatural, a human life is worth less than a piece of information, and an extragovernmental technocrat would rather sacrifice his own humanity than see reason. In 2026, few things could be more terrifying than that. Spielberg knows this and wields it mightily, proving once again that, while he’s not a strictly horror filmmaker, he can direct horror with the best of them.

Disclosure Day is in theaters now. 

Eve Hewson (second from left) in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

Continue Reading