Connect with us

Editorials

Icelandic Folk Horror ‘Tilbury’ Summons a Milk-Stealing Demon [Horrors Elsewhere]

Published

on

Horrors Elsewhere is a recurring column that spotlights a variety of movies from all around the globe, particularly those not from the United States. Fears may not always be universal, but one thing is for sure  a scream is understood, always and everywhere.

To the east of the Westfjords in Iceland lies the coastal town of Hólmavík. There, locals and tourists flock to the Museum of Icelandic Sorcery and Witchcraft—a reminder of the region’s mystical past. The museum highlights arcane rituals used during hard and unusual times in the area; folks back then turned to the dark arts for many needs and wants. Whether they wanted to better their chances of surviving the harsh terrain, or they wanted to take revenge on someone, people relied on a variety of enchantments. All throughout history everywhere, magic was a common method of making sense of the world’s mysteries and overcoming difficulties. 

It was around the seventeenth century when one certain Icelandic practice was born in the Westfjords; the tilberi was created and exclusively used by women who wanted to steal milk. As seen in the aforesaid museum’s displays, the tilberi (or snakkur) is a sinuous, fleecy demon whose only objective was to collect milk from cows and ewes so witches can churn their own butter. A woman made one of these creatures by taking the rib bone from a recently buried man’s body, winding it in wool, and then placing it between her breasts. The tilberi finally came to life after its summoner spat consecrated wine on the object several times. In exchange for the tilberi’s services, a witch fed it her blood through a nipple-like growth on her thigh.

This singular folk creature is prominently featured in 1987’s Tilbury, one of two RÚV-aired movies penned and directed by Viðar Víkingsson during the ‘80s; the other being Draugasaga from 1985. The controversial, made-for-television film is set in the summer of 1940 as the British forces invade Iceland out of fear of Germany taking the island. The telefilm centers around Kristján Franklin Magnúss’ character Audun Thorarinsson, a competitive swimmer who leaves his rural home to not only find a better place to train, but also to work for the British army in Reykjavík. Before Audun departs, a parson and friend of his family seeks a favor; he asks the athlete to check in on his daughter in the city, Gudrun (Helga Bernhard).

Audun’s schedule largely revolves around swimming or doing physical labor for the British army. During his spare hours, he keeps to his word and looks up Gudrun, who is now involved with a British officer named Tilbury (Karl Agust Ulfsson). This news is devastating because Audun still carries a torch for his boyhood friend. In time though, the protagonist realizes his rival is not even human.

With Tilbury being set in the past rather than in the ‘80s, the movie has a timeless quality. The historical context ties into a theme of outsiders; the story explores the country’s anxieties during a war it wanted no part of in the first place. Iceland’s neutrality and refusal to join the Allies caused British forces to invade, and Víkingsson highlights the growing restlessness towards the unwelcome occupation. At first, Audun quietly submits like everyone else and even offers support, but upon witnessing firsthand the small shifts in everyday life as a result of the invasion, he changes his tone. He speaks up and acts out while everyone else around him just accepts the new status quo.

Traditional depictions of a tilberi are woolly and serpentine, but the one shown here is initially humanlike with only some exaggerated facial traits to suggest Tilbury is different from the other officers. Otherwise, the insidious imp’s presence goes undetected by everyone except Audun and a foil to Gudrun named Bardi Kemp (Adalsteinn Bergdal). Once Audun sees Gudrun with Tilbury in the cemetery together, he becomes jealous and paranoid. His subsequent behavior actually touches on the phenomenon called Ástandið—this term meaning “the situation” refers to the contentious socializing between Icelandic women and Allied troops during WWII. The visible effect the Allied soldiers had on women led to an active discouragement of fraternization as well as accusations of prostitution and treason when encounters happened. With new legislation introduced to quash any consorting between foreigners and women, Iceland practically changed overnight with the arrival of 25,000 British soldiers. Cultural norms were upheaved, and people moved to Reykjavík in droves. The movie being made decades after the fact is probably why it does not share the same blanket contempt for said unions, yet Audun’s reception to Gudrun and Tilbury embodies the outmoded sentiment.

Repression and autonomy are other viable throughlines in Tilbury. It all begins with Gudrun’s devout father’s request—Audun keeping an eye on the daughter in Reykjavík—and evident disapproval of his daughter’s lifestyle. He also blames people’s modern distractions when explaining why church attendance is low as of late; this includes sports, as he insinuates during his talk with Audun. However, swimming is Audun’s personal way of staying chaste and conforming to expectations. It is only when his sanctum is directly tainted do things change; the British build a gun emplacement at the pool and constantly monitor the building. Meanwhile, Gudrun has since given up swimming in search of finding her independence away from the church and her father. Using swimming as a thinly veiled metaphor, Audun urges her to continue practicing because otherwise, it is a sin not to. Both these characters are essentially on the same moral course with Gudrun a few giant steps ahead. Although by the end, it is clear Audun is well on his way to his own awakening.

This unpredictable and phantasmagoric telepic employs Val Lewton’s best visual habits and pairs well with David Lynch’s surrealism. The atmosphere here is, in a word, astounding. Once the subversive movie reaches its fevered pitch, viewers witness frenzied ballroom dancing, erotic suckling, and uncanny manifestations of childhood dreams and desires. Víkingsson packs a lot into fifty-five minutes, but it feels like there is still so much more to tell in this unique serving of folk horror.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading