Connect with us

Editorials

‘Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives’ Gave Us One of the Most Entertaining Final Girls of All

Published

on

From the beginning, the Friday the 13th franchise delivered memorable Final Girls that outlasted the slaughter and defeated their foe. The first film saw Alice (Adrienne King) end Mrs. Voorhees’ (Betsy Palmer) reign of terror by removing her head. Part 2’s Ginny (Amy Steel) ranks high among the franchise’s favorites for her tough-as-nails perseverance and quick wit. But this Friday, the 13th, let’s pay our respects to the liveliest final girl of the entire series; Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives Megan Garris (Jennifer Cooke).

Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives was released in theaters on August 1, 1986, marking a dramatic shift in tone from A New Beginning. The final entry in the Tommy Jarvis saga injected a self-referential sense of humor, and a Frankenstein-inspired twist, courtesy of writer/director Tom McLoughlin. That meant a less severe and traumatized version of the hero, Tommy, now played by The Return of the Living Dead’s Thom Mathews. Tommy Jarvis might be designated the hero of Jason Lives, but it’s also his actions that cause Jason to return from the grave in the first place.

Tommy returns to Crystal Lake, now named Forest Green, to burn Jason Voorhees’ remains. Thanks to a thunderstorm and some angst, Tommy manages to revive Jason instead, with a metal fence post that acts as a lightning rod. It sparks a new bloodbath, just in time for campers and camp counselors to arrive at Camp Forest Green. But due to Tommy’s past, the local authorities don’t believe his claims of Jason’s return. He spends much of the film at odds with Sheriff Mike Garris (David Kagen). Tommy’s sole ally? The Sheriff’s rebellious teen daughter, Megan.

Right away, Megan’s personality comes across as atypical for a Final Girl. She boldly flirts with Tommy, locked in a holding cell, right in front of her father. It has as much to do with annoying and embarrassing dad as it does with finding Tommy cute. Her playful side continues when leading young campers in a cheer against eating brussels sprouts and boys. Megan continuously defies dad’s orders to stay away from Tommy and manages to make a game out of evading police while hiding Tommy in her lap. Megan doesn’t seem to take much seriously, and it makes her unpredictable and endearingly entertaining.

Her exploits in getting Tommy out of his holding cell and back to Camp means she’s not in actual danger for most of the movie. That means that she’s enjoying herself, having a great time messing with dad’s deputies, and embarking on car chases. It’s infectious. When the third act arrives, though, and she’s forced to confront mortality, Megan steps up to the plate in a big way.

Megan makes the children a priority, both calming them and making sure they’re safe. Sure, she understandably panics, especially when her father enters the equation, and she nearly dies at Jason’s hands to save the children. But she’s also the one to save Tommy and ultimately deal the finishing blow. Tommy’s attempt to sink Jason at the bottom of the lake goes awry; he nearly drowns. It’s Megan who dives into the lake to pluck him out, and she uses the boat propeller to finally end the battle.

There’s a lot to love about one of the lighthearted entries in the franchise. The self-referential humor, the nods to “Frankenstein”, and Mathews’ take on franchise mainstay Tommy Jarvis all make it for an entertaining slasher. But it’s Megan’s transformation from party gal out for a good time into Final Girl that offers one of the most unique and satisfying character arcs of the series.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading