Connect with us

Editorials

‘Housebound’: Home Is Where the Haunt Is [Horrors Elsewhere]

Published

on

Horrors Elsewhere is a recurring column that spotlights a variety of movies from all around the globe, particularly those not from the United States. Fears may not be universal, but one thing is for sure a scream is understood, always and everywhere.

Standing trial for robbery is just the beginning of Kylie Bucknell’s troubles in the 2014 film, Housebound. In light of the defendant’s repeat offenses, a judge decides Kylie needs stability; something maybe her mother can provide. Others in the same boat would be relieved to serve their jail time with family and in the comfort of their childhood home. Yet judging from Kylie’s reaction as she hears the details of her sentence, going back home is nothing short of terrifying.

Gerard Johnstone’s directorial debut starts off like a lot of other horror movies; someone returns to their hometown. Of course Kylie (Morgana O’Reilly) is not visiting Bulford of her own accord. For the next eight months, Kylie is left in the care of her mother Miriam (Rima Te Wiata) and stepfather Graeme (Ross Harper). The transition is not easy given the visible friction between daughter and mother, and the presence of what may very well be a ghost in the house. Kylie’s search for clues with probation officer Amos (Glen-Paul Waru) soon reveals this is no ordinary haunting.

The horror elements come into play after Miriam plants the idea that the house has always been haunted. Kylie is skeptical, but the mother reminds the daughter she used to feel similarly growing up. This is where Miriam does Kylie a disservice; she fills her head with superstition. And with the protagonist under house arrest, she now spends her time trapped inside with a supposed ghost. Her cabin fever eventually gives rise to obsession and paranoia. Ordinary sounds — the house settling or cats crying in the middle of the night — are suddenly proof of the uncanny. Amos’ convenient hobby of ghost hunting only adds to the problem.

Housebound comes from a long line of horror movies that combine comedy with terror. This enduring trend of humorous horror is especially popular in New Zealand, and it took off after Peter Jackson’s earlier films, Bad Taste and Braindead. Although nothing in Housebound is all that spine-chilling, Johnstone still manages to create and sustain tension in spite of the wacky atmosphere. Those intervening doses of humor throughout also soften the story’s heaviness without removing any of the emotional value or effect.

Families are a timeless subject in horror. While other narratives have a tendency to be serious or abrasive with the topic, Housebound is lighthearted but also not shallow. Moments punctuated by quips, wit or slapstick still have some emotional weight to them. This includes Kylie’s simmering resentment as she hears her mother’s every word, Miriam’s passive aggressiveness after discovering her daughter has done something thoughtless again, and Kylie feeling out of sorts when on the receiving end of genuine affection. The characters’ inability to express their emotions is both amusing and relatable.

Kylie is not the easiest character to root for. She is indignant, stubborn and selfish. It is never completely laid out why Kylie begrudges her mother so much, but a good guess would be her absent father. Kylie’s court-ordered therapist Dennis (Cameron Rhodes) hits a bit of a sore spot when he brings up her estranged father, who moved away years ago and started a new life with his new family. Logic suggests Kylie would be mad at him, but as is so often the case in these divorces, the child takes their anger out on the parent who stayed. Kylie gives in to bad habits when she finds out the truth about the house’s origins and blames her mother for everything. Miriam, however, is naturally stoic. She could have been more truthful with her daughter, but whether or not it was intentional, Miriam offered herself as a target for Kylie’s spite as well as a distraction from the pain of losing a father.

Normally viewers might feel disappointed when a horror movie changes course midway through. As soon as Kylie starts chasing ghosts and digging up the past in the second act, Housebound restates its own mystery. This entails a protracted hunt for answers, which at times makes for a less spirited story until the conclusion. As an alternative, the plot shakeup adds to the themes of family and acceptance and sets the stage for a gory tour of the house.

Kylie and Miriam’s strained relationship slowly but surely improves. They are on better terms at the end, but the road getting there is fraught with bumps. At first their clashes are routine; Kylie always undermines her mother’s optimism and refuses to listen to her advice. Things then escalate as Kylie’s investigation becomes more intense and involved. Originally, Miriam protects Kylie when the police insinuate she had something to do with Dennis’ bizarre injury. No matter how unkind Kylie is toward her and everyone else, Miriam still wants to help her daughter. That maternal bond is later challenged once Kylie’s erratic behavior causes accidental harm to someone close to them. At last though, a disheartened Miriam manages to come out in full support of her child when everything becomes especially hairy in Housebound.

Baked on top of the central family drama is a ghost story that takes some considerable turns. The basic concept is familiar, but Johnstone’s approach is refreshing, genuinely funny and fairly consistent in tone. Housebound is yet another win for Kiwi horror.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading