Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

“Mockingbird Lane” – Looking Back on Bryan Fuller’s Edgy Reboot of ‘The Munsters’

Published

on

When it comes to Gateway Horror, it’s hard to name a better example than The Munsters. Based on tropes and characters from the Universal Monster movies, this lovable family of misfits has been entertaining audiences for almost 60 years. That’s why it’s no surprise that they’ve also survived numerous attempts at reboots and remakes. While the latest of these projects is Rob Zombie’s upcoming cinematic adaptation, there’s an often-overlooked incarnation of America’s spookiest neighbors that I think deserves more attention.

Naturally, I’m referring to Bryan Fuller‘s Mockingbird Lane, a darkly humorous re-imagining of The Munsters produced by NBC.

Originally airing as a Halloween Special back in 2012, Mockingbird Lane was actually the failed Pilot episode for a proposed revival of the iconic sitcom, this time re-imagined as a gothic drama with a humorous twist. The basic setup remains the same, with the Munster family moving into their iconic mansion and dealing with nosy neighbors and supernatural hijinks, but the presentation is completely different. Taking inspiration from Fuller’s previous work on morbid comedies like Dead Like Me and Pushing Daisies, Mockingbird Lane attempted to apply an even darker coat of paint over the usually cheerful family, playing around with their monstrous qualities while also updating the characters for a new generation.

From the opening scene, which reveals Eddie Munster (Mason Cook) in a less-cuddly version of his werewolf form, it’s clear that Mockingbird Lane was willing to remix familiar characters in order to tell a more modern story. Oblivious to his inherited bloodthirsty tendencies, Eddie isn’t the only one to undergo an edgy makeover. Jerry O’Connell (Scream 2, Piranha 3D) takes over as a decidedly sexier Herman Munster, looking more like an undead model than a jolly Boris Karloff knock-off. While Jerry retains the character’s (quite literal) soft heart, this version of the show sees him struggling to come to terms with the family’s darker side.

Munster Family Values.

Played by Arrested Development favorite Portia de Rossi, Lily Munster also underwent a visual overhaul. While Mockingbird Lane retains her characterization as a loving yet fiery-tempered housewife, this version of Lily leans heavily into the seductive Vampiress trope (though the costume design sadly ditches the goth-friendly outfits of Yvonne De Carlo). Lily’s niece Marilyn (Charity Wakefield) is the only character that appears to have been directly transplanted from the original show, complete with 60s-styled mannerisms and a wardrobe to match. Ironically, these idiosyncrasies make her stand out alongside her misfit relatives, though it’s clear that the others are disappointed with her “condition” as a regular human.

The family is also joined by the legendary Eddie Izzard, who turns in a highly memorable performance as the wise-cracking Grandpa. Heavily implied to be Count Dracula himself (he even bakes D-shaped cookies for the neighbors), Izzard’s interpretation of the geriatric vampire simply takes Al Lewis’ sardonic personality traits and dials them up to 11, resulting in the most entertaining character of the lot. From his gaudy outfits to his nonchalant approach to bloodshed, Grandpa’s sarcastic remarks and vampiric outbursts are clearly the glue that hold this special together.

While a single 40-minute episode doesn’t allow for the kind of character development that made the original show a hit, Mockingbird Lane had plenty of potential for both traditional sitcom stories like dealing with prejudice and family drama as well as tongue-in-cheek homages to classic horror films. I particularly enjoyed Herman’s fake-out introduction, which frames his silhouette like a square-headed Frankenstein’s monster only to reveal a lightly-scarred father figure when he steps into the light.

It’s a shame that the production didn’t allow for more practical effects, as complex elements like Eddie’s werewolf form and the pet dragon reveal are depicted through low-budget digital imagery. It’s also worth noting that Grandpa occasionally shapeshifts into a winged bat-like creature when he’s about to feed, resulting in a few instances of remarkably dated computer graphics. There are a few shots of Izzard in full bat makeup, which adds to the fun factor, but the difference in quality makes these moments even more jarring.

Grandpa’s drinking again…

The locations are also brought to life via a clever mix of CGI and beautiful set design, though it mostly blends together pretty well. Like in the original show, the 1313 Mockingbird Lane residence is something of a character in and of itself, with its lavish corridors and decorations meshing well with the special’s colorful costumes and even more colorful characters. This gives the program a stylistic edge that we’d only see again when Fuller began work on NBC’s Hannibal, another show which would adapt established characters and take them into unexpected directions.

Ultimately, I think the bloated runtime is what really keeps Mockingbird Lane from reaching its full potential. This peculiar blend of horror and sitcom tropes would work much better in 22-minute bursts rather than an hour-long drama, and I think that’s what really killed the Pilot. It’s also possible that audiences simply weren’t ready for this particular brand of tongue-in-cheek horror on the small screen back in 2012, with network executives complaining about the excessive violence and inconsistent tone. Either way, this would be the last time that we’d see the Munster family for nearly a decade.

Even if Fuller’s approach to humor isn’t your cup of tea, I think it’s safe to say that Mockingbird Lane is one of the weirdest and most loving depictions of the Munster family since their inception back in the 60s. That’s why I’d argue that it’s still worth revisiting today as a televised oddity, even if it wasn’t popular enough to warrant a full show. While I’m still excited to see Rob Zombie’s take on the iconic family, I would have loved to watch a complete season of Fuller’s modernized Munsters, if only to see more of Eddie Izzard’s absurd suburban Dracula.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and filmmaker that spends most of his time thinking about movies.

Click to comment

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading