Connect with us

Editorials

Revisiting Sylvain White’s ‘Slender Man’ [The Silver Lining]

Published

on

Watching a bad movie doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad experience. Even the worst films can boast a good idea or two, and that’s why we’re trying to look on the bright side with Silver Lining Horrors, where we shine a light on the best parts of traditionally maligned horror flicks. This time, we’ll be discussing 2018’s Slender Man!

From winning a spooky photoshop competition to becoming a worldwide phenomenon in just a few short years, it’s no wonder that Eric Knudsen’s infamous Slender Man would eventually find its way to the big screen. The real mystery here is why it took so long for a big studio to finally tackle the faceless menace, with Sony’s 2018 film being preceded by nearly a decade of viral memes, YouTube channels and even extremely successful videogames.

Nevertheless, Sylvain White’s take on this seminal internet legend managed to make an impact, though it probably wasn’t what the director and producers had intended. Starring Joey King, Jaz Sinclair, Annalise Basso and more as an ensemble of teenagers who find themselves being stalked by the titular entity (played by genre veteran Javier Botet), Slender Man takes quite a bit of inspiration from The Ring when adapting this eerie meme for a brand-new audience.

Boasting talented young actors, extremely stylish directing and a script informed by years of online folklore surrounding the internet’s most recognizable monster, the long-awaited film appeared to be destined for success…


SO WHAT WENT WRONG?

Joey King (Wren) and Julia Goldani-Telles (Hallie) in Screen Gems’ Slender Man.

Scoring 8% on Rotten Tomatoes and 3.2/10 on IMDB (plus a Golden Raspberry “award” for Jaz Sinclair), it’s clear that neither critics nor audiences really connected with this retelling of the Slender Man story. While the film wasn’t exactly a box office failure, there was a notable drop in ticket sales as word-of-mouth began to spread and audiences realized that this wasn’t the internet-based scary movie that they had been waiting for.

It’s easy to dismiss this failure as yet another case of “bad movie results in bad reviews”, but there was more going behind the scenes than most people seem to realize. Sylvain apparently dealt with loads of studio interference during the project, with producers eventually demanding that he cut the picture down to a PG-13 rating and remove many scenes that had already been featured in the trailer.

Having already faced bad luck with studio-backed horror pictures in 2006, when the director was infamously given only two weeks to prepare for the production of I’ll Always Know What You Did Last Summer, White once again got the short end of the stick. Not only was he forced to compromise his creative vision, but audiences were left with a nearly unintelligible finished film that ends abruptly without concluding several of its own subplots.

The controversy surrounding the Slender Man story didn’t help either, with the film releasing four years after an infamous stabbing perpetrated by a couple of fans attempting to “appease” the fictional entity. When the first trailer was released, the father of one of the convicted teenagers publicly denounced the film, requesting a boycott in the Wisconsin area. This ended up intimidating the studio, which subsequently toned down their marketing campaign and demanded further cuts in order to distance the project from the real-world tragedy.


THE SILVER LINING:

If you can get past the studio-mandated cuts and janky screenplay, I’d argue that there is a decent movie hidden somewhere beneath the surface of Sony’s Slender Man. The cast and crew are clearly talented enough to produce a watchable film, and dissecting the trailers reveals a plethora of interesting scenes and ideas that were removed from the finished product. In fact, even in its current mutilated state, there are still quite a few things to love about this ill-fated horror flick.

Javier Botet turns in a brief yet terrifyingly memorable performance as the titular entity, doing the internet legend justice as he blends in with the woods and pursues desperate teenagers both digitally and in the real world. There may be a few too many CGI embellishments during his appearances, but kudos to the Slender Man movie for at least getting the look of the monster right. I particularly like how the iconic suit is actually part of the creature’s body, making it look like an otherworldly being attempting to emulate a human.

The movie actually boasts great visuals in general, with the entire picture benefiting from a gloomy, nightmarish vibe. The surreal atmosphere and unsettling imagery make this an appropriately creepy horror flick even when no one appears to be in any danger. This is mostly due to Luca Del Puppo’s slick lighting and cinematography, which somehow makes it feel like the titular entity is always watching from afar.

Slender Man even has a couple of thrilling chase sequences, all of which highlight White’s strengths as a versatile filmmaker. The director often relies on clever camera setups and the creature’s elongated silhouette in order to deliver simple yet stylish scares, making great use of classic visual horror tropes like the Jacob’s Ladder head shake and even a couple of effectively disorienting Dolly Zooms.

At the end of the day, I’d say that that Slender Man isn’t really a filmmaking disaster, it’s just clearly unfinished. It may be far from a traditionally good scary movie, but there’s enough good material here for me to want to see a proper R-rated director’s cut. However, even if we never get to see a superior version of the film, I hope that other filmmakers can learn from its noble attempt at adapting an internet myth to the big screen.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading