Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Exploring the Exploitation of Rob Zombie’s ’31’ [The Silver Lining]

Published

on

ROB ZOMBIE's 31 | image via Alchemy and Sundance

Watching a bad movie doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad experience. Even the worst films can boast a good idea or two, and that’s why we’re trying to look on the bright side with The Silver Lining, where we shine a light on the best parts of traditionally maligned horror flicks.

This time, we’ll be discussing Rob Zombie’s 2016 throwback, 31.

In the United States, it’s said that more people disappear on Halloween than on any other night of the year. While this isn’t all that surprising when you consider that the holiday encourages children to walk around unsupervised and interact with costumed strangers, this eerie factoid would inspire rocker-turned-filmmaker Rob Zombie to come up with a story about who might be responsible for these mysterious vanishings.

Taking inspiration from grindhouse classics like the Ilsa films and Two Thousand Maniacs!, this retro thriller would also borrow from the deadly game shows of movies like The Running Man in a gory period piece. Simply titled “31”, the finished film depicts a single night of terror as a bizarre secret society abducts a group of carnival workers. Finding themselves in a macabre labyrinth, the ill-fated carnies are forced to compete in a cruel game against a series of costumed psychopaths in the world’s bloodiest Halloween celebration.

With the film shaping up to be a no-holds-barred love letter to the exploitation flicks of yore, and Zombie insisting on working outside the studio system so that the finished movie could be as hardcore as he (and the fans) wanted it to be, horror hounds were ecstatic when the project was first announced.


SO WHAT WENT WRONG?

Rob Zombie's 31

Earning back a little over half of its $1.5 million budget and garnering a measly 35% on Metacritic, it’s clear that 31 wasn’t the underground hit that Zombie had hoped for. Even die-hard fans had difficulty warming up to the low-budget gore-fest, accusing the flick of simply rehashing the director’s favorite tropes on a shoestring budget. Once the dust finally settled, most critics agreed that 31 was the worst entry in Zombie’s filmography, but very few of them discussed the reasons why the film ended up the way it did.

Aiming to avoid studio meddling, Zombie opted to raise a significant part of the film’s budget through crowdfunding websites. This ended up contributing to some of the film’s issues, with the crew almost constantly running on fumes despite two successful online funding campaigns. While the lack of corporate oversight allowed for more freedom during production, the ensuing technical limitations took their toll on the story the filmmaker was trying to tell.

Zombie’s choice of shooting the film guerilla-style also didn’t seem to help, with the director favoring messy handheld shots when chronicling the 12-hour-long murder spree conducted by the psychotic “Heads”. At the end of the day, the grimy production design and lo-fi photography left many audiences thinking that the end result looked cheap when compared to Zombie’s previous work, and some critics even compared the finished product to a rushed music video.

The film’s nihilistic mean streak didn’t win over a lot of fans either, with even dedicated horror hounds complaining about the script’s seemingly excessive brutality and profanity for profanity’s sake. Zombie even had a hard time submitting the completed feature to the MPAA, which insisted on several cuts in order to secure an R rating for a theatrical release. While I personally think that the more vicious elements of the movie are its greatest strengths, especially when it comes to the kills, I understand why mainstream audiences might fail to connect with such a bleak picture.


THE SILVER LINING

31 has grown on me over the years. While it’s not a traditionally good horror flick and I agree that it ranks quite low on Zombie’s filmography, the finished product is still way better than it has any right to be. If you can look past the low production value, shoddy cinematography and familiar script, there are quite a few positive elements that prove beyond a doubt that Rob Zombie is still a skilled auteur even when he stumbles.

For starters, the retro style can actually be quite engaging, with the quick and dirty photography harkening back to Quentin Tarantino’s claim that Rob Zombie is the only living director that’s still making honest-to-God exploitation flicks. Featuring everything from little people in Nazi uniforms to chainsaw-wielding clowns, the manic energy behind this neo-Grindhouse experiment suggests that it would have been right at home in a smoke-filled theater back in the mid-1970s.

Veteran character actor Richard Brake also elevates the film with his powerhouse performance as “Doomhead”. While he’s only in the picture during the very beginning and the very end, Brake steals the show and enhances every single scene he’s in. From his spine-chilling monologues to his genuinely threatening presence, Brake is easily the best part of the movie and it’s a damned shame that the script doesn’t do more with him. With his grisly clown makeup and psychopathic tendencies, it’s also easy to see why a lot of fans believe that the actor would have made for a terrifying Joker.

Ironically, despite being attached to a less-than-stellar motion picture, the film’s kick-ass finale is likely one of Zombie’s best ever. The chilling use of Aerosmith’s Dream On (suggested by Sheri Moon Zombie herself) enhances the nihilistic confrontation between a battered Charly and Doomhead, making for a near-perfect example of the infamous Bolivian Army Ending trope.

It may be far from Zombie’s best work, but I think 31 improves with repeated viewings and will likely live on with a small but dedicated cult following. After all, “in hell, everybody loves popcorn”, and there’s no denying that this is one hell of a popcorn flick.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and filmmaker that spends most of his time thinking about movies.

Click to comment

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading