Connect with us

Editorials

‘Munchies’ Proudly Ripped Off ‘Gremlins’ Back in 1987 [Hidden Gems]

Published

on

Oh boy. Munchies (1987) is…something.

Produced by the beyond prolific and legendary Roger Corman and directed by Tina Hirsch, Munchies is a late 80s rip-off of Gremlins – one of the slew of similar films to follow in the wake of the 1984 Amblin classic.

Corman is known for cashing in on any hot film or genre of the day with low rent rip-offs. Some are genuinely good (Galaxy of Terror) while others are cheap bores (The Terror Within). Munchies falls somewhere in between. It’s a very odd film – one I found myself annoyed by more than charmed.

During a dig in South America where archeologist Simon (Harvey Korman) is trying to prove the pyramids were made by aliens (just go with it), he and his wannabe stand-up comedian son Paul discover the titular Munchie. Simon believes the creature to be an alien. They take the little muppet (later dubbed Arnold) away from the dig back home to California. Paul and his girlfriend Cindy (Nadine Van Der Velde of Critters) soon find out Arnold is not all that he seems.

Simon’s twin brother, Cecil (also Harvey Korman) is a huckster who seemingly runs all of the town’s commerce and wants Arnold for himself. Little does Cecil know that when a Munchie is threatened, they turn bad. They also turn jive talking and horny. Go figure.

Oh, and apparently they multiply when dismembered.

This flick is a curiosity only in how much it doesn’t try to mask how much it’s ripping off Gremlins. It deadass struts around proudly, wearing its rip-off badge with honor. Frank Welker (Stripe in Gremlins) voices half of the Munchies; the poster’s tagline is a riff on the Gremlins poster tagline; the Munchies tool around in an AMC Gremlin; they have a want to multiply exponentially; a Gremlins toy can be seen at one point in the film; the term “gremlin” can be seen in bold letters in a tabloid rag during one scene; and even the film’s director was the editor on Gremlins.

I could go on, but you get the point. I think this review will mention Gremlins more times than the actual title of the film in question…

Due to being a Gremlins obsessive, I would glom onto any film about diminutive monsters causing mayhem. I rented them all as a child, and Munchies was actually in the rotation for me along with the likes of Ghoulies 2 and the Critters films. They were all magical in their own way to my young and yet-to-be-jaded eye.

I hadn’t seen Munchies in, jeez, maybe over 20 years until I sat down to rediscover it for this column. The experience was strange, to say the least.

If you squint, you could actually see the vague imprint of clever ideas in the film. You see, Simon had an evil brother! A twin! A bad double! Then Arnold the Munchie spawns, you guessed it, evil twins! See?! There’s like, parallels there or something!

The Munchie action, while copious, isn’t particularly fun or well-staged. Due to the obvious low budget, the little beasties just flap and flop around the whole time with almost nothing in the way of articulation. They aren’t all that well designed either.

It almost becomes funny in spite of itself. They tried, okay!

The film doesn’t take itself seriously, which allows for it to go down easy. There are mild chuckles peppered around here and there all mostly due to character actor Harvey Korman as Cecil giving his role more effort than he probably should have. You get the sense that there may have been a degree of ad-libbing in many of his scenes he shares with various cast members, as they are the scenes that generate the most legitimate sources of humor.

If you have a soft spot for puppets in your horror flicks like I do (you will soon learn I have many soft spots when it comes to horror), Munchies is worth a watch if only as a curiosity of diving into the depth of Gremlins rip-offs. Munchies is not Critters, or hell, even Critters 3. But it’s better than Hobgoblins 2. And, well, that’s something, right?

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading