Connect with us

Editorials

Horror Headlines: 5 Tales of Journalism Terror from TV Anthologies [Series of Frights]

Published

on

anthology

Real-world journalism comes with some occupational hazards, but usually death isn’t one of them. In the horror genre, on the other hand, members of the press find themselves in danger every time they get a hot lead on something weird and unexplained. Their tenacity never does them any good; one minute they’ve found the story of their career, the next they’re never heard from again.

Journalists often get in over their heads in horror. Something goes wrong in their investigation, and they end up becoming the story. As these five TV-anthology tales illustrate, digging for the truth can also mean digging your own grave.


Out of the Unknown (1965-1971)
Deathday

anthology

Out of the Unknown was one of several BBC anthologies from the ’60s and ’70s. And like others from this era, this show was almost entirely scrubbed from existence. It was common practice to erase series back then, but thankfully some episodes managed to survive and have since found their way back into the public domain, either through DVD or personal archives.

After largely telling sci-fi stories in its first three seasons, the fourth and final installment of Out of the Unknown embraced fantasy and horror. One of the surviving episodes, “Deathday“, is a psychological thriller about a prim and proper newspaper reporter who learns of his spouse’s infidelity. Husband Adam (Robert Lang) is devastated by not only the affair but also the fact that Lydia (Lynn Farleigh) wants to stay married as well as continue her affair with some chap named David.

While she does it calmly, Lydia tears Adam down for not physically satisfying her needs like David can. She blames his safe newspaper job, but the problem clearly runs deeper. She wants someone who, in addition to providing her security, can make her feel unsafe. She wants excitement, and a man as cautious and predictable as Adam isn’t going to give it to her.

Everything changes once Adam kills his wife and blames the crime on The Kitchen Killer from the news. As anticipated, things do not go as planned, and Adam loses his grip on reality. This heady adaptation of Angus Hall‘s novella first hits a nerve and then finally rips it wide open.


Hammer House of Horror (1980)
The Thirteenth Reunion

anthology

This delectable episode of the one-season anthology Hammer House of Horror owes itself to EC Comics; the story of “The Thirteenth Reunion” lifts a ghoulish idea from the pages of Tales from the Crypt. The similarities may be coincidental, though. To help preserve the ending of this tasty terror tale for new viewers, the Crypt story in question won’t be named.

In this episode, screenwriter Jeremy Burnham and director Peter Sasdy satirize the bizarre weight-loss trends of the ’80s. Julia Foster plays reporter Ruth, who’s been assigned to cover a controversial “health farm.” As Ruth pretends to be a client, she witnesses the cruel treatments practiced by the on-site staff; patients are publicly ridiculed about their physique. This harsh method doesn’t do Ruth’s friend at the health farm, Ben (Warren Clarke), any good, though. He hasn’t lost any weight, and for some unknown reason, the doctors want him to eat more.

In the meantime, a funeral home employee suspects something weird is going on at his job, and he asks for Ruth’s help after Ben mysteriously dies in a car accident. What she uncovers is indeed juicy, but she might not live long enough to write about it.

“The Thirteenth Reunion” is a gratifying three-course meal with a decadent twist at the end. The writing is less than subtle, and some actors have a tendency to chew the scenery. The more savvy viewers will realize what’s going on long before Ruth ever does.


Tales from the Cryptkeeper (1993-1994, 1999)
All the Gory Details!

The animated spin-off of Tales from the Crypt started off adapting EC Comics stories before shifting to original material. And unlike the original series, this anthology was aimed at younger audiences. This of course means Tales from the Cryptkeeper is devoid of gore and salacious elements. The Cryptkeeper, who is still voiced by John Kassir, is joined by his fellow raconteurs from the pages of classic EC, the Old Witch (Elizabeth Hanna) and the Vaultkeeper (David Hemblen).

In Season Two’s “All the Gory Details!“, writer Erika Strobel and director Laura Shepherd pair senior reporter Harold (Harvey Atkin) with a younger reporter named Sally (Tabitha St. Germain). They’re in search of the mad scientist Dr. Cromwell, who was on the cusp of creating artificial life before the authorities stopped him. Now, Sally and Harold look for the missing Cromwell in a small town.

Sally spends a lot of the episode defending herself to a fuddy-duddy who ridicules her whenever he can. The two reporters are divided by a generational gap, and the older one certainly doesn’t refrain from tossing out a chauvinistic comment here and there. Harold is without question an obnoxious character, but he and Sally play well off each other. It’s almost a pity what happens at the end of the episode.

“All the Gory Details” turns into a Frankenstein-esque story, although the conclusion is unexpected. It would seem like these two disparate personalities would finally find some common ground after their ordeal, but they ultimately diverge on the subject of ethics. And true to life, being stubborn has consequences.


Ghost Stories (1997-1998)
Beware the Muse

Years before it was renamed ABC Family and then finally Freeform, Fox Family Channel aired a supernatural anthology called Ghost Stories in the late ’90s. Given its home, presumably this series would be wholesome and barren of anything too alarming. Anyone who happened to see this show knows it could get pretty dark, though.

Joe Wiecha‘s “Beware the Muse” is one example of how Ghost Stories didn’t always play it safe. Writers Bradley Thompson and David Weddle‘s episode follows a disgraced reporter who’s now stuck working at a sleazy tabloid newspaper after fabricating facts at his last publisher. Now, James Rowe pumps out disposable trash pieces, like how Liberace’s ghost possessed Siegfried and Roy’s tiger. Eventually Rowe hits the jackpot when he starts writing a successful series of articles about the ghost of a long-executed serial killer named Dominick Palmer.

Just when it seems like the main character couldn’t get any worse, Rowe beavers away at whatever shred of decency he has left. Both his past and current lies catch up to him, and he pays the ultimate price for stretching the truth again and again. His lurid writing comes true, and people start to die for real. Kind of like a giant séance, the tabloid’s increased readership is now manifesting Palmer’s ghost.

Sleazy reporters are common in fiction, and like so many of them, the one in “Beware the Muse” is served his own “just desserts” fate. This might not be the most innovative episode in Ghost Stories, but it does a creative job of showing how a lie can become the truth.


Lost Tapes (2008-2010)
Lizard Man

The most unique anthology series in existence has to be Lost Tapes. This hidden gem from Animal Planet uses the popular found-footage technique. And for three seasons, this show highlighted cryptids and other folkloric creatures. Cryptozoology docuseries were, and still are, commonplace, yet none of them are quite like Lost Tapes.

Season Two tackled the famous cryptid of Lee County in the episode “Lizard Man“. The “real” Lizard Man first appeared in this South Carolina area in the late ’80s, and for some time, it was a local sensation. The same cryptid was covered in other paranormal docuseries Destination Truth and Fact or Faked.

In “Lizard Man”, a news reporter tags along with two firefighters as part of a human interest story. Along with a camera operator, the three enter the sewer in search of a missing cat. What they instead find is far from feel-good; they discover the carcasses of other pets. There’s a predator beneath the city, and it’s hankering for bigger prey.

“Lizard Man” quickly evolves into a shaky-cam slasher where the namesake hunts down the news team and firefighters. There is always a sense of urgency in this series, and here the threat level is off the scale. Fans of any sort of first-person horror storytelling are encouraged to give this audacious series a watch.


Series of Frights is a recurring column that mainly focuses on horror in television. Specifically, it takes a closer look at five episodes or stories — each one adhering to an overall theme — from different anthology series or the occasional movie made for TV. With anthologies becoming popular again, especially on television, now is the perfect time to see what this timeless mode of storytelling has to offer.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading