Connect with us

Editorials

Appreciating the Cosmic Thrills of 2014 Alien Horror Movie ‘Extraterrestrial’ [The Silver Lining]

Published

on

alien horror movie

In this edition of The Silver Lining, we’ll be covering Colin Minihan’s alien abduction thriller, Extraterrestrial! 

At one point, it can be argued that the Vicious Brothers were one of Canada’s most influential filmmaking duos, only challenged by the Soska Sisters in genre cinema. While these punk-rock partners (who aren’t really brothers) skyrocketed to stardom after the popularity of 2007’s Grave Encounters, they weren’t too keen on repeating themselves after that initial success, even passing along their directorial duties to John Poliquin on Grave Encounters 2. 

For their next endeavor, the duo decided to look back on an unproduced passion project. Inspired by their perceived lack of “cool” alien movies in the horror genre, the filmmakers had come up with a story informed by UFO abduction accounts and government conspiracy theories long before their first feature film. Updating the script, they soon began production on what would eventually become 2014’s Extraterrestrial.  

This time, however, Colin Minihan would sit in the director’s chair by himself, with Stuart Ortiz hanging back to co-write and produce the picture. Ditching the Found Footage format, the finished movie follows an ensemble of friends (featuring then up-and-comers like Brittany Allen and Freddie Stroma) who find themselves besieged by hostile grey aliens after shooting one of them during an abduction attempt. A grueling battle for survival ensues as our protagonists stumble upon a disturbing conspiracy between humankind and extraterrestrial invaders. 

Once the first trailer dropped, hinting at cosmic frights in the vein of Fire in the Sky and more production value than Grave Encounters, genre fans were naturally ecstatic for a legitimately scary alien abduction thriller. 


SO WHAT WENT WRONG?

alien horror movie scary

Making less than a single million at the box office on a $3 million budget and scoring a disappointing 28% on Rotten Tomatoes, I think it’s safe to say that Extraterrestrial wasn’t exactly the galactic hit that the Vicious Brothers had been expecting. While the meager box office return is mostly due to a limited theatrical release, that doesn’t quite justify the cold critical response. 

Most media outlets accused the picture of being a predictable collection of sci-fi clichés held together by misguided attempts at humor and standard genre scares. Even the more positive reviews claimed that the picture was trashy fun at best, with critics citing numerous logical inconsistencies with the movie’s script, as well as a general lack of innovation – not to mention unlikable characters. 

From the titular extraterrestrials acting more like mindless movie monsters than a highly-evolved race of hyper-intelligent beings to our main characters behaving like dimwitted teenagers, it’s easy to see where this criticism was coming from. These problems were made even worse by the film’s overreliance on computer imagery, with its lofty ambitions occasionally exceeding the effects budget. 

Of course, one of the biggest complaints was directed at the film’s pacing, as it simply takes too long to get to the interesting part. Most of the runtime plays out like a run-of-the-mill “cabin in the woods” horror flick, with the movie only truly diving into its Ufology origins towards the end of the experience. 

Suffice to say this wasn’t this generation’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind. 


THE SILVER LINING

alien horror movie 2014

While I think there are a handful of UFO-related horror gems out there, I mostly agree with the Vicious Brothers about there not being enough “cool” alien abduction movies. While Extraterrestrial likely won’t go down in history as the sci-fi horror classic that changed this reputation, I think it’s easy to overlook its flaws when you realize the absurd amount of effort that went into making this strange little passion project work. 

From the remarkable use of visual effects despite a decidedly less-than-blockbuster budget to a handful of compelling performances (especially by a paranoid Michael Ironside), there’s a lot to love about the film even if its shoddy script brings the experience down a notch. 

For starters, there are plenty of sly nods to UFO culture, from the general depiction of the aliens to their methods of abduction. There’s even a legitimately terrifying anal probe sequence, which I think is up there with the Fire in the Sky abduction as one of the scariest bits of UFO media out there. Even Ginger Snaps Emily Perkins has a minor role as Nancy McPherson (with her character being inspired by the infamous McPherson Tape, a controversial alien-centric Found Footage flick from 1989). 

Of course, the real Silver Lining here is that bonkers final act, which elevates the rest of the experience through some clever special effects wizardry as it brings the interior of an alien mothership to life. Sure, it takes a while to get to there and the build-up isn’t quite as interesting as it should have been, but I personally think that the outer space climax makes the whole movie worth watching. The story even concludes with a brief shout-out to The X-Files’s Cigarette-Smoking Man, which is always a bonus in conspiracy-related media. 

In all honesty, my only real gripe with the film is that I think it would have worked much better as a Found Footage picture. The first-person format would have provided an added level of immersion and excused some of the script’s faults, as well as made the special effects a bit scarier. 

As it stands, Extraterrestrial is far from a genre masterpiece, lacking the sustained frights of similarly themed films like The Fourth Kind (not to mention the brainy screenwriting behind classics like Contact and Signs), but it’s still a genuinely fun horror movie with plenty of love directed at UFO nuts like myself. If you can stomach some uneven build-up and a handful of cringe-worthy moments, I think this creepy take on classic sci-fi tropes is worth revisiting. 


Watching a bad movie doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad experience. Even the worst films can boast a good idea or two, and that’s why we’re trying to look on the bright side with The Silver Lining, where we shine a light on the best parts of traditionally maligned horror flicks.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading