Connect with us

Editorials

Copycat Killers: 10 Slashers Inspired By the Original ‘Halloween’!

Published

on

halloween

No movie fundamentally changed the horror genre as much as the original Halloween. The Shape’s iconic debut inspired — and continues to inspire — countless other slashers. And while most of these movies are only vaguely similar to Halloween, such as Friday the 13th, others were more blatant in their design and execution.

The flicks in question aren’t always set on Halloween, the victim doesn’t have to be a babysitter, and the antagonist may or may not even be masked. However, despite the superficial differences, these ten examples are unmistakably influenced by Michael Myers’ first killing spree.


Nightmares in a Damaged Brain (1981)

Nightmares in a Damaged Brain (or simply Nightmare) has a well-earned reputation for being sleazy and gruesome. Romano Scavolini‘s previous work in pornography comes out often in this erotic slasher, but if there’s anything to take away from this exercise in lust and grisliness, the gore scenes are meticulously set up and executed. As in most of the movies here, the killer has escaped a hospital and is out for blood. In this case, Baird Stafford‘s character has schizophrenia, and he’s been subjected to heavy drugs and experimental psychotherapy.


Trick or Treats (1982)

Halloween

Gary Graver (also known as Robert McCallum) delivered perhaps the zaniest Halloween cash-in with 1982’s Trick or Treats. The movie begins with Carrie Snodgress‘ character having her husband (Peter Jason) committed to a psychiatric hospital against his will, and after a couple of years, he returns to get revenge on his ex. Meanwhile, Jackelyn Giroux‘s character is more afraid of the kid (Chris Graver) she’s babysitting on Halloween than his father, who’s now thrown on a nurse’s uniform and is bumbling his way toward their house! Trick or Treats isn’t an effective slasher, yet its weirder moments will make you laugh.


Alone in the Dark (1982)

halloween

Dr. Loomis fans will want to watch this post-Halloween slasher co-starring Donald Pleasence. A year after resuming his iconic role opposite Michael Myers in Halloween II, Pleasence played another psychiatrist in 1982’s Alone in the Dark. This time around, there are four killers (Jack Palance, Martin Landau, Erland Van Lidth, Phillip Clark) on the loose after a blackout frees them from a psychiatric hospital. The escapees then proceed to terrorize the family of another doctor from the same hospital. Jack Sholder‘s directorial debut not only adds more villains to the mix, it’s also a pioneer in the home invasion subgenre.


The Initiation (1984)

halloween

There was a small burst of dream-themed slashers starting in the early ’80s. A Nightmare on Elm Street is the most known example, though it technically came after (and eclipsed) The Initiation. When Daphne Zuniga‘s character is plagued by unsettling dreams, she and a grad student (James Read) conduct a sleep study to get to the bottom of these recurring nightmares. The terror escalates once the protagonist and her fellow pledges stay overnight inside a department store as part of their sorority’s initiation rituals. It might not seem clear how this slasher is particularly influenced by Halloween, but in time the inspiration becomes more evident.


Sorority House Massacre (1986)

halloween

Sorority House Massacre borrows from Halloween II as well as the original 1978 movie. In this slasher, which also uses the aforesaid dream theme, Beth (Angela O’Neill) is stalked by her homicidal brother, who’s freshly sprung from a — you guessed it — psych hospital. The setting is now a sorority house, and Beth shares a sort of telepathic connection with her murderous sibling. As unoriginal as it is, Sorority manages to scrounge up some decent suspense. There are two sequels, both of which are ridiculous in their own special ways.


Blood Rage (1987)

halloween

No holiday was left unturned as slasher filmmakers looked for new settings and gimmicks in the ’80s. With Halloween already taken, the folks behind Blood Rage settled on Thanksgiving Day. Ten years after a brutal incident at a drive-in theater, a man’s brother escapes from a psychiatric hospital to get revenge. He crashes his family’s Turkey Day festivities and carves them up. Blood Rage is regarded for its especially gory set pieces.


Offerings (1989)

By 1989, slashers weren’t as popular as they were earlier in the decade. This of course didn’t stop the stragglers from cropping up. One of these slasher slowpokes was Christopher Reynolds‘ underwhelming and poorly received movie Offerings. Here a man (Richard A. Buswell), once abused by family and picked on by his peers, returns to not only take revenge but also find the one girl who was nice to him back then. Offerings isn’t remembered by the masses possibly because it lacks the features that made earlier slashers so successful.


Happy Hell Night (1992)

In place of a sinister sibling or a random madman, the Canadian movie Happy Hell Night has a priest doing the killing. There’s also a supernatural angle to this panned slasher; the antagonist Malius (Charles Cragin) is practically demonic at the time of his first massacre on Halloween, and years later when he escapes his cell and picks off some unlucky college kids during hell night. Brian Owens‘ movie has been picked to shreds over its sloppy editing, paper-thin characters and barely there plot, but Happy Hell Night boasts some solid camerawork and creepy atmosphere.


Lovers Lane (1999)

As much as Lovers Lane is inspired by the new wave of teen-slashers, namely ScreamI Know What You Did Last Summer and Urban Legend, its basic plot better resembles that of Halloween. Here a Valentine’s Day massacre from years ago comes back to haunt a small town. The killer dubbed “The Hook” (Ed Bailey) was sentenced to life at a psych hospital for his crimes. In the present timeline, a new strand of murders suggest The Hook is back. ’90s slashers liked to keep the audience guessing, and Lovers Lane is certainly no different.


Frayed (2007)

Halloween

No entry here copies and pastes the concept of Halloween more flagrantly than the indie slasher Frayed. This movie initially comes across as totally derivative, and the pacing can be a challenge. However, as the ending comes into view, Norbert Caoili and Rob Portmann‘s story takes on a whole new shape. What happens there in those last couple of minutes redeems the entire movie, not to mention becomes one of the more shocking twists of 2000s horror.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading