Connect with us

Editorials

Finding Retro Fun in Stephen King’s ‘Sleepwalkers’ [The Silver Lining]

Published

on

sleepwalkers movie

In this edition of The Silver Lining, we’ll be tackling Mick Garris and Stephen King’s unfairly maligned Sleepwalkers!

For every successful Stephen King adaptation, there are usually a handful of lesser projects lurking in its shadow. From Dreamcatcher to Lawnmower Man, the King of Horror actually has quite a few box-office bombs under his belt, with some fans justifying this by claiming that adaptations miss out on crucial inner monologues and emotional subtext. However, there is one Stephen King project that suggests that there might be more to the middling reception of some of these movies than the adaptational process.

Naturally, I’m referring to Mick Garris’ Sleepwalkers, the one and only time that Stephen King wrote a story specifically for the big screen (or “scream”, as the posters gleefully announced). Back in the early 90s, King’s tales were already sizzling hot properties at movie studios, so Columbia Pictures immediately accepted King’s offer to write an original screenplay for a brand-new movie.

Influenced by classic monster flicks like 1942’s Cat People, King came up with a bizarre tale following an incestuous pair of vampiric shape-shifters (Brian Krause and Alice Krige) who move to a small town in Indiana as they continue their search for virginal victims to sustain them.

While the studio originally chose Rupert Wainwright to helm the feature, his insistence on rewriting parts of the story led to King championing another director to take Rupert’s place. That’s how Mick Garris and Stephen King began their first partnership, with the writer specifically choosing Garris to take over Sleepwalkers due to his work on the underrated Psycho IV.

With the movie boasting an original script that would surprise even die-hard fans of King’s work and an up-and-coming genre director with a unique vision, it makes sense that fans and media outlets were expecting Sleepwalkers to be yet another horrific hit.


SO WHAT WENT WRONG?

Stephen King’s name goes a long way when trying to get butts into seats, so it stands to reason that Sleepwalkers doubled its $15 million production budget at the box office. Unfortunately, that didn’t help much with critics, as the film currently holds a disappointing 29% on Rotten Tomatoes. In fact, the movie has even shown up on several “worst horror movie of all time” lists, becoming somewhat popular on the internet as a cinematic punching bag for online movie reviewers.

Many complaints were (and still are) directed at the film’s general lack of scares, with several critics comparing the flick to a teenage romance that just so happens to feature some laughable supernatural elements. There was also plenty of criticism directed at the absurd mythology surrounding the titular Sleepwalkers, from their unexplained superpowers to the exact rules behind their feeding rituals – not to mention their bizarre rivalry with domestic cats.

This lack of narrative cohesion extends to the rest of the movie as well, with the picture never really deciding on a single protagonist and just blindly following a random assortment of characters as they stumble towards a foregone conclusion. Mädchen Amick’s Tanya isn’t really fleshed out as anything more than a victim, and not enough time is spent on Krige and Krause to make them proper anti-heroes.

The wildly varying tone was also a problem for most audiences, as the film goes from slasher-inspired satire to serious family drama so fast that it’s liable to give some viewers whiplash. Individually, many of the movie’s strange moments work (like the “no vegetables, no dessert” one-liner or that shocking arm removal), but these scenes never manage to sustain tension, making it hard to feel legitimately scared.


THE SILVER LINING

sleepwalkers alice krige

This isn’t the first time that we’ve covered a Stephen King / Mick Garris team-up on The Silver Lining and I think there’s a reason for that. From NBC’s The Shining to Riding the Bullet, these two storytellers have a habit of polarizing audiences with their old-school collaborations – which might have something to do with their specific set of narrative influences. Both creators appear to draw from low-budget creature features and cheesy b-movies, and these campy elements are blasting on all cylinders in Sleepwalkers.

Sure, Sleepwalkers isn’t a particularly scary movie, but it doesn’t really have to be. It’s quite clear that the goal here was to make an intentionally absurd and thoroughly entertaining monster movie – and judging by those merits, I’d argue that Sleepwalkers is an incredibly successful midnight movie. It’s just a shame that general audiences didn’t see it that way back in ’92.

However, even if you’re not a fan of tongue-in-cheek retro horror, there are plenty of individually great elements here that would have been celebrated had they been a part of other Stephen King projects. For example, the film gives just as much attention to the Sleepwalker duo as Tanya’s family, letting audiences decide for themselves exactly how they should feel about these characters (though I admit it’s hard to sympathize with people who keep skinned cats in their front yard).

Alice Krige is also phenomenal in her role as the Sleepwalker matriarch, with her performance ranging from legitimately threatening to laugh-out-loud comical without missing a beat (I mean, only she could have pulled off that corn-on-the-cob kill with a straight face). Plus, the movie boasts a star-studded collection of cameos that are sure to please genre fans.

Finally, I adore the disgusting sphynx-cat-like design of the titular monsters. The effects might not always be up to snuff -especially during transformations- but the suits themselves are always eerie to look at. And the less said about that disturbing sex scene the better…

Ultimately, I appreciate how Sleepwalkers’ odd collection of idiosyncrasies makes it more fun than a simple straight-faced monster movie. It’s not exactly It, but there’s a cartoony sense of humor here that makes this odd flick worth revisiting 3 decades down the line. Plus, it’s sure to entertain bored housecats, as my own little feline horror fan seemed intrigued by the story’s cat-based mayhem.


Watching a bad movie doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad experience. Even the worst films can boast a good idea or two, and that’s why we’re trying to look on the bright side with The Silver Lining, where we shine a light on the best parts of traditionally maligned horror flicks.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading