Connect with us

Editorials

The Amityville IP: 1983’s ‘Amityville 3D’ Has a Great Climax and a Bland Protagonist

Published

on

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions.

After the highs of Amityville 2: The Possession, it’s hard not to see Amityville 3-D as something of a letdown. The Richard Fleischer-directed film lacks the visual flare that Damiano Damiani brought and the result is a film that is lacking all of the energy and verve of the first sequel. The new film feels more leaden and by the numbers, even as the film works overtime to justify its 3-D gimmick, which was all the rage in early 80s horror.

One stand-out aspect of the third Amityville is that it’s unafraid of being mean. The women, in particular, are treated horribly; the film’s two cruelest – and most memorable – deaths are reserved for supporting cast members Candy Clark (!) and Lori Loughlin (!!).

Unfortunately, the bulk of the film rests almost entirely on the shoulders of Tony Roberts, who turns in an astonishingly dull and unemotive performance as John Baxter. It makes sense in theory because of Baxter’s job as an investigative reporter who debunks supernatural claims, but, in reality, it makes for a very bland protagonist.

Amityville 3-D starts off well as John and co-worker Melanie (Clark) quickly prove that a pair of elderly charlatans have rigged up the Amityville house to hold sham seances. It’s a fun bit, particularly Baxter and Melanie’s oh-so-obvious matching tan trench coats and Melanie’s glee at hamming it up as a grieving mother and playing paparazzi with the camera.

The film then settles into a bit of a lull as Baxter inexplicably buys the house for a song (he’s divorcing Tess Harper’s Nancy, whose performance can only be described as “shrill and hysterical”). Bizarre events quickly begin stacking up, including the death of John Harkins’ realtor Clifford Sanders (via the now-compulsory Amityville flies) and Melanie has a freezing experience that leaves her shaken and upset.

Throughout it all, Baxter staunchly refuses to believe in the supernatural, even when Melanie is horribly burned to death following a car accident that contains shades of both Butcher Baker Nightmare Maker and Final Destination 2. It ultimately takes the unexpected boating death of Baxter’s adult daughter Susan (Loughlin) to make him finally take the claims against the house seriously.

Doubting Thomas characters are a persistent archetype in horror, and more specifically supernatural films, though they’re rarely interesting figures. Baxter’s insistence that everything in the house is normal is offset by Nancy’s almost-immediate belief in the opposite. In many ways, their relationship harkens back to the marriage dynamics of the original film, almost as though 3-D were a sequel to the 1979 original and not The Possession.

While Baxter is a bore, there is enough odd and unusual material here to merit a look. The (sadly underdeveloped) subplot involving paranormal scientist Dr Elliot West (Robert Joy) is intriguing, particularly the climax when West and his students inadvertently open the portal to hell in the house’s basement. West’s baby face and his supposed paranormal expertise create an odd disconnect, but his inevitable death via a goopy demon that first singes his face, then drags him to a watery death is highly entertaining.

The climax also kills a legion of Red Shirt students and while they’re certainly not characters (they’re introduced solely to be murdered by the house), the dead kids make for a spectacular telekinetic and pyrotechnic display. This is the kind of energy we’ve come to expect from an Amityville film. If only the film had embraced this kind of madcap ridiculousness throughout and wasn’t encumbered by such a dud protagonist!

The Amityville IP Awards

  • Best Death: Poor Melanie! She narrowly avoids being facially impaled by a row of pipes, but the house maliciously traps her in her car where she is slowly and brutally immolated. It’s a great sequence and a horrible way to go.
  • Best Sequence: Nancy is a bit of a dunce for foolishly believing Susan is okay when she spots her water-logged daughter walking upstairs. This specter, however, is another example of the house’s mean-spirited trolling: Nancy is, of course, already dead on the pier outside by this time.
  • Best FX: the flies in Saunder’s death occasionally look like flying specs of poo and most of the 3-D involves mundane objects being thrust at the camera (boom mics?! Really?), but the water goblin that hugs Dr. West in the well is great, gross and memorable!
  • Celebrity Sighting: A young Meg Ryan appears as Susan’s “bad girl” friend Lisa and she’s delightful. Sadly the minute Susan bites it, Lisa disappointingly exits the film. Still, even in just a few scenes, it’s easy to see the magnetism of Ryan’s star power.

Next time: we’ve run out of theatrical entries, so we’re headed into direct-to-video territory with Amityville 4: The Evil Escapes (1989).

Joe is a TV addict with a background in Film Studies. He co-created TV/Film Fest blog QueerHorrorMovies and writes for Bloody Disgusting, Anatomy of a Scream, That Shelf, The Spool and Grim Magazine. He enjoys graphic novels, dark beer and plays multiple sports (adequately, never exceptionally). While he loves all horror, if given a choice, Joe always opts for slashers and creature features.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading