Editorials
‘Smile’ – Six Things We Learned from the Blu-ray’s Commentary Track
Smile is a true rags-to-riches story of indie filmmaking. Parker Finn‘s short, Laura Hasn’t Slept, premiered at SXSW, where it won the Special Jury Award and caught the attention of Paramount. They developed it as a feature with the intention of going straight to streaming, but test screening reactions were so strong that they pivoted to a theatrical release. It went on to become the highest grossing horror film of the year with over $200 million worldwide.
The movie’s home video release includes an audio commentary by Finn (complete with commentary subtitles!), among other extras. The first-time filmmaker discusses his intentions behind several creative choices, from storytelling to camera movement.
Here are six things I learned from the Smile commentary….
1. Caitlin Stasey reprises her role from the short
Laura, the PhD student that passes the curse to protagonist Rose Cotter early in the film, is played by Caitlin Stasey, who starred in Laura Hasn’t Slept (which is also included on the disc). While not a remake or a direct continuation, Finn designed it to be a parallel that “would go in a very different direction than the short.”
The experience that Laura describes also foreshadows everything that Rose will go through over the course of the movie. The entire scene – a complicated sequence with emotional performances, technical camerawork, and special effects – was shot in a single day.
2. The title drop had to be altered to avoid causing seizures
The aforementioned Rose/Laura scene concludes with a complex shot that moves from Laura’s dead body to Rose before pushing into her pupil, culminating with the title flashing on screen accompanied by discordant music – occurring 13 minutes into the movie. “I personally love a delayed titled title drop in a film, and it felt like a perfect opportunity to pull one of these off,” notes Finn.
“I had always known I wanted to do something that was incredibly anxiety-inducing for the title drop,” he continues. It had to be recalibrated several times after discovering the original version failed the Harding test, meaning that it could trigger photosensitive people and potentially induce seizures. Finn is “very pleased with the end result.”
3. None of the smiles in the film are digitally enhanced
All the creepy smiles throughout the film are entirely performance-based without any digital augmentation, as Finn smartly believed that keeping them natural would make them scarier.
“The studio asked early on whether or not we wanted to use visual effects to enhance the smiles,” he reveals. “But to me it was really important that they play as grounded. I thought they would be much creepier, honestly much more intense if it was just a human performance. And it also allowed us to get different nuances between all the different smiles that appear in the film, which I love.”
4. Smiles are hidden throughout the movie
Finn and production designer Lester Cohen took joy in planting smiles throughout the film. The camera lingers on some – like the sign at the model train shop and the pain chart at the hospital – while others are more subtle. For example, Rose’s husband’s contact photo that shows up when they first text has a natural, closed-mouth smile then changes to a toothy grin when seen later in the film.
5. Rose’s “last chance” to survive is reflected in the production design
After discovering that she could save herself from the curse by killing someone else, Rose returns to her apartment. The camera angle reveals a piece of mail that says “Last Chance” beside the doorway. This was an intentional bit of production design to correspond with Rose’s ultimatum.
6. The monster was nicknamed Lollipop
The entity that takes people over, hauntingly revealed in the film’s final moments, was lovingly referred to as Lollipop by the cast and crew. This ties into The Chordettes’s “Lollipop” playing over the end credits, creating a tonal whiplash from the downer ending.
Smile is available now on 4K Ultra HD, Blu-ray, DVD, and Digital via Paramount.
Editorials
Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel
The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.
That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.
It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.
That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.
The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’
For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.
This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.
This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.
Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.
So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.
The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.
Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.
While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.
At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.
After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.




You must be logged in to post a comment.