Connect with us

Editorials

How the ‘Mother’s Day’ Remake Properly Updates a Low-Budget Troma Film from the 1980s

Published

on

Pictured: ‘Mother’s Day’ (2010)

No Troma remake should attempt to match Troma at its revolting, boundary-demolishing, trigger-happy game. Take 1980’s Mother’s Day, for example. Troma Entertainment ringleader Lloyd Kaufman let his brother Charles Kaufman shoot a rape-revenge exploitation sleazefest no mamma would applaud. Darren Lynn Bousman’s 2010 remake abandons Tromaville signatures almost entirely for a mean-mugging reinterpretation rooted in more straightforward thriller formulas because few indie studios are willing to push as far as Troma — especially in today’s acutely more socially attentive climate. You could get away with Mother’s Day (1980) in the 80s, especially with its cereal bowls filled with consumerism commentaries, but even today’s midnighter-loving moviegoer is looking for something more evolved.

Then again, Troma’s catalog might be the most fertile soil for remakes, given how even midrange studio pocket change would be a budgetary increase. Troma Studios has earned its legacy as an independent horror tentpole, but rewatching older “classics” today can be … a challenge. Titles like Mother’s Day (1980) exist to offend and reach for extremes, which is what built Troma’s reputation decades ago. The problem is that borderline edgelord desire to be the nastiest, most disrespectful, and least tasteful version of horror cinema has aged poorly in some cases (gosh, did I like Poultrygeist: Night of the Chicken Dead way more when released in 2006 when I was in high school). Bousman’s approach to remaking Troma’s Mother’s Day lays a template for how to honor 80s low-budget splattergore cinema with the right mindset — very, very loosely.


The Approach

‘Mother’s Day’ (1980)

Bousman and writer Scott Milam approach 2010’s Mother’s Day by cautiously dipping their toes into Tromaville’s polluted lakes. Backwoods murderers and sexual deviants swap for countryfied criminals who aren’t necessarily psychopaths by definition, just robbers who pick the wrong safehouse (until the whole virginity-be-gone scene). Troma’s sociopathic goofiness that blurs the lines between slapstick humor and perverse indulgences is nowhere to be seen — Bousman’s vision is gritty home invasion tension that doesn’t want you to laugh. It’s parallel to Fede Álvarez taking the dark-and-fucking-terrifying route to his remake of Sam Raimi’s more fun-and-games (in comparison) Evil Dead. New movie, new vision, same mad-in-the-head mommies.

Powerhouse actress Rebecca De Mornay is our maleficent matriarch, Natalie “Mother” Koffin. Her boys Ike (Patrick Flueger), Addley (Warren Kole), and Johnny (Matt O’Leary) seek refuge after a botched robbery at their mother’s house — only to find she fled after foreclosure and resale. In the basement is a birthday party for new homeowner Daniel Sohapi (Frank Grillo), organized by his wife Beth (Jaime King), with multiple friends in attendance. After hearing commotion upstairs, Daniel finds Johnny bleeding out on his couch and thus begins a standoff between the Koffin boys and their pesky hostages. Mother arrives in her RV with daughter Lydia (Deborah Ann Woll) to clean up her boys’ mess … by making an even bigger one.

The similarities between Milam’s script and Charles Kaufman’s and Warren Leight’s original screenplay are references sprinkled into dialogue. One of the Koffins remarks about how they hate disco, a callback to the teeth-brushing sequence where O.G. Addley (Michael McCleery) and Ike (Gary Pollard) argue over punk and disco. Another line complains about Fruity Pebbles since boxes of sugary breakfast trash are a staple in 1980’s Mother’s Day. Troma programming can be spotted on the background television. Queenie “lurks” as a spoken myth, and cleaning chemicals are once again a weapon. Other than that, Milam inverts almost every conceivable aspect, from bringing peril to the victims’ doorstep this time or making Mother a far more adversarial mastermind who enjoys verbally manipulating Beth and Daniel’s guests. No skinnydipping, no baseball stadium pranks, no police costumes. Mother’s Day (2010) might as well have a different title.


Does It Work?

‘Mother’s Day’ (2010)

We love a remake that’s adamant about clearing its own path. Bousman honors the genesis of Mother’s Day (1980) but stays wholly committed to his interpretation of events in a way that’s never beholden to existing fanbases. Everything works because Mother’s Day (2010) never holds nostalgia precious enough to let it distract Bousman from executing a still bloody, still ruthless struggle for survival against a mamma’s brainwashed brothers in arms. It’s how you usher a Troma concept into the 2010s — leave what appealed to ’80s raunch-and-shock behind and speak to contemporary audiences.

The dynamic storytelling switcheroos inject much-needed intensity as we fear 2010’s Mother even though she speaks politely and with comforting inflections. Ike and Addley also become more dangerous because they’re no longer bumbling juvenile oafs — they’re more formidable than manchildren. Bousman and Milam want their parallels to be The Strangers or Funny Games, dialing into a revisionist remake that doesn’t fumble Troma’s penchant for eye-rolling lewdness. A majority of Mother’s Day (2010) shoots as straight as the most mainstream horror presentations you’ve seen this side of You’re Next. Avoidance of repetition is a good thing, he says for the billionth time in this column’s history.

Although, there are choice touches that still nod back to Charles Kaufman’s blisteringly inappropriate tale of tortured and abused women. Bousman uses the hyper-sexual awkwardness of Mother guiding her possibly dying son’s first lovemaking encounter as something that seems bred from Tromaville sex education classes. It hits out of nowhere for a massive shock because hardly anything feels Troma-adjacent until Mother starts unzipping Johnny’s fly. There’s power in patience and reward in restraint, since Mother’s Day (1980) only has one desensitizing speed. Mother’s Day (2010) is a steamy build that boils over with such a scalding sting, and remains pleasantly in line with the tonal harmony that precedes then follows.


The Result

‘Mother’s Day’ (2010)

Mother’s Day (1980) and Mother’s Day (2010) feel like only-visit-on-holidays cousins, not even siblings. One listens to Butthole Surfers, watches VHS video nasties, and “reads” nudie magazines. The other listens to Killswitch Engage, watches slasher classics, and reads Fangoria. Neither are wrong; both are special little snowflakes. We’re lucky to have options so well suited for varieties of tastes throughout horror audiences, which Bousman clearly understands from the start. Mother’s Day (2010) is a traditional horror arrangement set to the tune of noose-tight devastation, never shy about its dare to differentiate.

De Mornay is endlessly watchable as Mother, the sly cat who adores batting around the mice she’s caught before showing her claws. The way Mother pits lovers against one another by exposing their secrets, or emasculates poor Dave (Tony Nappo) by tearing his hairpiece from his scalp is devilishly entertaining. Mother’s Day (1980) is about the snatch and inevitable revenge, whereas Mother’s Day (2010) delves into the messiness of shattered lifestyle perfection through character analysis. Milam strives to make his script more than just another murder spree, which leads to an accomplished cast meeting an array of fates from foolish to redemptive. Some might declare the ending divisive given how it exits on feel-bad bleakness even after so much avoidable sadness, but is it that much different than Troma’s decision to reveal Queenie as a final boss to battle (with the assumption that there’s no survival)?

Let’s not forget that Mother’s Day (2010) delivers special effects that might not be Troma sloppy but redecorate Daniel’s fixer-upper with gooey red colored accents. SFX creator Francois Dagenais honors Addley’s original death with ample brutality as he’s stabbed and suffocated, gives us nail gun glory against Ike, and shotgun blasts Dave’s noggin Maniac style. Tromafied gore is its own magnificent beast, but Bousman’s veteran understanding of the horror genre ensures that standoff violence remains just as important as psychological thrills and barbaric chills. The stacked cast is a massive upgrade (Briana Evigan, Lyriq Bent, Shawn Ashmore), overall quality benefits from a facelift, and we still get slathered in the yucky-chunky stuff — Mother’s Day (2010) is the revamp we deserve.


The Lesson

‘Mother’s Day’ (2010)

In most cases, remakes shouldn’t be an “anything you can do, I can do better” competition. Mother’s Day (2010) isn’t about Bousman usurping Troma. Mother’s Day (1980) would be received differently in 2010 or 2023. I’m not saying Troma wouldn’t still make it today, but there’s a reason you’re never hearing people rave about Troma’s newest releases like Shakespeare’s Sh*tstorm. Bousman’s take on Mother’s Day is a testament to how I always preach about the best remakes reflecting a filmmaker’s unique vision, and you’ll be hard-pressed to find an original-remake combination with that much distance between the two.

So what did we learn?

● Mother always knows best, even when dealing with a hostage scenario and possible jail time.

● Remakes should make something new, not refurbish something old.

● Some eras are more complicated than others to modernize, and 80s exploitation midnighters are a prime example.

● It’s not disrespectful to do your own thing with a remake — it’s quite the opposite.

Speaking of Troma remakes, I’m foaming at the mouth for Macon Blair’s The Toxic Avenger. It’s Troma’s premiere mainstream property and possibly the least egregious when it comes to the studio’s uglier tendencies. I’d love a remake of Poultrygeist without all the low-hanging racial humor and flagrant record-scratch-yikes usage of slurs, but The Toxic Avenger makes the most sense for contemporary success. Blair doesn’t have the same hurdles as Bousman when honoring source material for the new generations of horror fans, and an updated Toxie could be a massive success. Let’s get that into my eyeballs ASAP, please?


In Revenge of the Remakes, columnist Matt Donato takes us on a journey through the world of horror remakes. We all complain about Hollywood’s lack of originality whenever studios announce new remakes, reboots, and reimaginings, but the reality? Far more positive examples of refurbished classics and updated legacies exist than you’re willing to remember (or admit). The good, the bad, the unnecessary – Matt’s recounting them all.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading