Connect with us

Editorials

‘Monster Hunter’ – Why It’s One of the Most Entertaining Monster Movies in Recent Years

Published

on

Monster Hunter movie

While I’m glad that there’s been a recent boom in entertaining video game adaptations (like Peacock’s surprisingly fun Twisted Metal show), there has always been a curious discrepancy between games with impressive narratives that would benefit from the blockbuster treatment and games that are actually popular enough to warrant the investment of adapting them into other media.

This is why we often see more gameplay-driven titles reach the big screen (like Super Mario Bros and Resident Evil) before narrative-heavy franchises like Sanitarium or even Metal Gear Solid. It could be argued that this is a good thing, as there’s no point in adapting a story that already feels like a movie while you’re playing it, but it also means that filmmakers sometimes get free reign to do whatever they want in a picture so long as it generally ties into the larger world established by whatever video game they happen to be adapting.

One entertaining example of this odd trend is Paul W.S. Anderson’s 2020 adaptation of Capcom’s Monster Hunter, an unapologetically silly creature feature that leans into the franchise’s focus on spectacle over story while still working as a mostly solid monster movie. As a long-time Monster Hunter fan, I actually didn’t have high hopes when this picture was first announced, as I’ve always enjoyed these games as intense grind-fests while I listened to music or podcasts in the background instead of paying attention to any real story elements.

Funnily enough, Anderson would get around these game-y limitations by borrowing from a crossover event where the cast of Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker found themselves using military ordinance to face off against iconic antagonists from the Monster Hunter series. This is why the finished film decides to pull a reverse Masters of the Universe – with Milla Jovovich playing a Ranger Captain from our world who gets accidentally transported to a fantastical land populated by enormous man-eating beasts and primitive monster slayers (who are often accompanied by feline companions). She then teams up with a nameless hunter (Tony Jaa) in order to face the increasingly dangerous wildlife of this brave new world.

Unfortunately, the Monster Hunter movie was released in the middle of pandemic, an ill-advised move that resulted in the film not even making back its own budget at the box office. Not only that, but most critics dismissed the flick as an inexplicably expensive B-movie with a less-than-satisfying finale – with that last detail being something that I happen to agree with.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Monster Hunter movie jovovich

In all honesty, Monster Hunter really is a glorified B-movie on a blockbuster budget, borrowing from the same familiar tropes as cheesy Roger Corman productions and not really caring about frivolous things like “physics” during its action scenes. However, that’s precisely why I think the end product is so much fun. While Anderson is a self-professed Monster Hunter fan, it’s quite clear that he’s just using the franchise’s basic elements as an excuse to play around in a massive filmmaking playground.

In fact, I actually think that the first half of the flick works on its own as one of Anderson’s best-directed projects, with Jovovich’s Artemis having to learn to cooperate with a complete stranger who doesn’t even speak the same language as her in what feels like a heartfelt throwback to classics like Enemy Mine.

Not only does this setup make for a legitimately thrilling survival thriller as these warriors from different worlds are forced to team up against a larger threat (namely the horned dragon Diablos, a recurring enemy from the games), but it’s also a chance for Jovovich and Jaa to show off their natural charisma in lieu of scripted dialogue. Naturally, the cast expands later on with the addition of Ron Perlman as a surprisingly game-accurate Admiral and his band of hunters and humorous Palicos, but this initial portion of the movie is still the highlight of the experience.

In a media landscape dominated by world-ending threats and what has become pejoratively known as “Marvel dialogue,” I actually think it’s kind of refreshing that Monster Hunter chose to take the road less travelled when it comes to keeping its story and characters as simple as possible. Unfortunately, this doesn’t extend to the film’s so-called “ending,” with the story taking a baffling detour instead of properly concluding and turning into a trailer for a sequel that will probably never come.

I guess you can’t win them all…


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Monster Hunter movie dragons

With a title as self-explanatory as Monster Hunter, I’m glad to announce that the film does in fact contain plenty of monsters and quite a bit of hunting. While the PG-13 rating and the overall nature of the source material means that it’s not as brutal as the director’s previous genre work, Anderson still managed to keep these spiders and wyverns as intimidating as possible.

And while these monsters are incredibly true to the games, with their designs often looking like high-resolution glow-ups of the exact same models developed by Capcom, the way they’re shot feels directly lifted from the very best kaiju films. That being said, there’s something strangely compelling about watching a gigantic dragon take on mere humans armed only with primitive weapons crafted from the scraps of other monsters.

Large-scale creature features usually content themselves with heavy vehicle-based artillery or even giant robot battles, so it’s fun to see a film dial all of that down and focus on our most primal dragon-slaying fantasies. Sure, it’s a shame that these memorable beasts are almost entirely brought to life by CGI, but there’s a lot of fun to be had in watching Jovovich slay fearsome beasts that aren’t exactly undead.

The Monster Hunter movie is by no means a classic, eschewing proper storytelling in favor of CGI-heavy set-pieces while also suffering from a poorly structured final act, but I still think it’s one of the better monster movies in recent memory. From that compelling first half to the undeniable charisma of its leads, I’d recommend this one to any genre fan looking for a giant monster film where the main characters learn to fight back in increasingly ludicrous ways.


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

11 Years Later: The Horrific Cycles of Violence in ‘Only God Forgives’ Starring Ryan Gosling

Published

on

Traditionally, movie theater walkouts are usually associated with the horror genre, with infamous cases ranging from 1973’s The Exorcist (particularly during the crucifix masturbation scene) and even Lars Von Trier’s controversial serial killer memoir, The House That Jack Built.

That being said, there are exceptions to this rule, as some movies manage to terrorize audiences into leaving the theater regardless of genre. One memorable example of this is Nicolas Winding Refn’s 2013 revenge thriller Only God Forgives, a film so brutal and inaccessible that quite a few critics ended up treating it like a snuff film from hell back when it was first released. However, I’ve come to learn that horror fans have a knack for seeing beyond the blood and guts when judging the value of a story, and that’s why I’d like to make a case for Winding’s near-impenetrable experiment as an excellent horror-adjacent experience.

Refn originally came up with the idea for Only God Forgives immediately after completing 2009’s Valhalla Rising and becoming confused by feelings of anger and existential dread during his wife’s second pregnancy. It was during this time that he found himself imagining a literal fistfight with God, with this concept leading him to envision a fairy-tale western set in the far east that would deal with some of the same primal emotions present in his Viking revenge story.

It was actually Ryan Gosling who convinced the director to tackle the more commercially viable Drive first, as he wanted to cement his partnership with the filmmaker in a more traditional movie before tackling a deeply strange project. This would pay off during the production of Only God Forgives, as the filmmaking duo was forced to use their notoriety to scrounge up money at a Thai film festival when local authorities began demanding bribes in order to allow shooting to continue.

In the finished film, Gosling plays Julian, an American ex-pat running a Muay-Thai boxing club alongside his sociopathic brother Billy (Tom Burke). When Billy gets himself killed after sexually assaulting and murdering a teenager, Julian is tasked by his disturbed mother (Kristin Scott Thomas) with tracking down those responsible for the death of her first-born child. What follows is a surreal dive into the seedy underbelly of Bangkok as the cycle of revenge escalates and violence leads to even more violence.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

There’s no right or wrong way to engage with art, but there are some films that clearly require more effort from the audience side in order to be effective. And while you can’t blame cinemagoers for just wanting to enjoy some passive entertainment, I think it’s always worth trying to meet a work of art on its own terms before judging it.

Despite being a huge fan of Drive, I avoided Only God Forgives for a long time because of its poor critical reception and excessively esoteric presentation. It was only years later that I gave the flick a chance when a friend of mine described the experience as “David Lynch on cocaine.” It was then that I realized that nearly everything critics had complained about in the film are precisely what made it so interesting.

If you can stomach the deliberate pacing, you’ll likely be fascinated by this stylish nightmare about morally questionable people becoming trapped in a needless cycle of violence and retaliation. Not only is the photography impeccable, turning the rain-slicked streets of Bangkok into a neo-noir playground, but the bizarre characters and performances also help to make this an undeniably memorable movie. And while Gosling deserves praise as the unhinged Julian, I’d argue that Vithaya Pansringarm steals the show here as “The Angel of Vengeance,” even if his untranslated dialogue is likely to be unintelligible for most viewers.

However, I think the lack of subtitles ends up enhancing the mood here (even though some editions of the film ended up including them against the director’s wishes), adding to the feeling that Julian is a stranger in a strange land while also allowing viewers to project their own motivations onto some of the “antagonists.”

And while Only God Forgives is frequently accused of burying its narrative underneath a pile of artsy excess, I think the heart of the film is rather straightforward despite its obtuse presentation. I mean, the moral here is basically “revenge isn’t fun,” which I think is made clear by the horrific use of violence (though we’ll discuss that further in the next section).

To be clear, I’m still not sure whether or not I enjoyed this movie, I just know that I’m glad I watched it.


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

There are two different kinds of gore effects. One of them is meant to entertain viewers with exaggerated wounds and excessive blood as you admire the craftsmanship behind the filmmaking. The other kind is simply a tool meant to simulate what actually happens when you injure a human body. Like I mentioned before, Only God Forgives isn’t trying to be “fun,” so you can guess what kind gore is in this one…

From realistic maimings to brutal fist fights that feel more painful than thrilling, the “action” label on this flick seems downright questionable when the majority of the experience has you wincing at genuinely scary acts of grisly violence. I mean, the story begins with an unmotivated rampage through the streets of late-night Bangkok and ends with the implication of even more pointless violence, so it’s pretty clear that you’re not really meant to root for an “action hero” here.

I can’t even say that the deaths resemble those from slasher flicks because the movie never attempts to sensationalize these horrific acts, with Refn preferring to depict them as straightforward consequences of violent people going through the motions – which is somehow even scarier than if this had just been yet another hyper-violent revenge movie.

Not only that, but the characters’ overall lack of moral principles makes this story even more disturbing, with the main antagonist being the closest thing to a decent person among the main cast despite also being a brutal vigilante.

Only God Forgives doesn’t care if you like it or not (and actually takes measures to make sure that the viewing experience is often unpleasant), but if you’re willing to step up to this cinematic challenge and engage with the narrative and visuals on their own terms, I think you’ll find an unforgettable nightmare waiting for you on the other side.


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading