Connect with us

Editorials

6 Other Experimental Slashers to Watch Before ‘In a Violent Nature’

Published

on

In A Violent Nature Review
Pictured: 'In a Violent Nature'

Even after decades of masked killers armed with increasingly ludicrous weapons, cinemagoers still flock to theaters to experience the raw thrills of watching homicidal maniacs hunt the most dangerous game. And while there’s nothing wrong with filmmakers choosing to rely on tried-and-true formulas when depicting classic cat-and-mouse conflicts, the sheer amount of these movies means that horror fans often find themselves wishing for riskier takes on these familiar ideas.

Thankfully, there are some brave filmmakers out there that use of the basic premise of a slasher as a jumping off point to tell more creative stories. A recent example of this is Chris Nash’s highly ambitious In a Violent Nature, a Friday-the-13th-inspired horror film told from the melancholy perspective of the undead killer himself. And with the film impressing genre fans with its artsy reinvention of common clichés, we’ve decided to come up with a list highlighting six other experimental slashers for discerning horror fans to watch before checking out Nash’s somber mood piece.

Naturally, six features are just a drop in the bucket when compared to the vast selection of creative slashers available out there in the wild (i.e. streaming services), so don’t forget to comment below with your own strange and horrific favorites if you think we missed a particularly odd one.

With that out of the way, onto the list.


6. Rubber (2010)

There’s nothing wrong with a one-trick pony so long as the trick is reasonably entertaining, and that’s precisely why Rubber makes it onto this list as an unexpectedly clever slasher with a meta twist. Boasting a premise so silly that it could have been a Tim & Eric sketch (with the film following the exploits of a homicidal tire inexplicably gifted with telekinetic powers), newcomers might be surprised to learn that there’s a lot more to this absurdist parable than initially meets the eye.

Defying expectations, French filmmaker Quentin Dupieux uses the inherent ridiculousness of Rubber to explore and question exactly what motivates viewers to seek out self-indulgent cinema – all the while providing us with some genuinely funny fourth-wall breaks.


5. Funny Games (1997/2007)

I know that placing Funny Games and its remake in the number 5 spot technically makes this a Top-7 list (and the low body-count means that some might consider it more of a home-invasion thriller than a true slasher), but the fact is that both versions of this terrifying classic are worth seeking out for different reasons.

Directed by Michael Haneke, both the original film and its American remake tell the story of a family being attacked by a duo of psychotic young men engaged in an increasingly sadistic “game.” Equal parts brutal and witty, this is another case of a genre-savvy filmmaker flipping familiar tropes on their heads in order to explore our voyeuristic fascination with violence in film.

I’d just recommend skipping this one for family movie night.


4. Malevolence (2004)

Mike Holtz already did a wonderful job unpacking this underrated indie gem in its own article, so suffice to say that Stevan Mena’s Malevolence is a must watch for John Carpenter fans looking for a slasher with more metaphorical meat on its bones. It may not seem all that original on the surface, especially where presentation is concerned, but it’s the implied backstory about nature vs nurture that makes this such a fascinating watch (especially during repeat viewings).

The low budget and heavy-handed Halloween inspiration may not be to everyone’s liking, but I still think that this is one of the best examples of a “serious” slasher that focuses more on storytelling than gore. And if you like this one, I’d also recommend checking out the prequel (Bereavement) and sequel (Malevolence 3: Killer), all produced by the same team.


3. Triangle (2009)

I can’t really get into the details of what makes this film an “experimental” slasher without completely spoiling the surprise, so I’ll just have to urge readers to check this one out immediately without looking up anything else about it beforehand. However, if you’ve already seen Christopher Smith’s mind-bending thriller, you’ll know exactly how it manages to reinvent a tired scary movie formula.

Taking inspiration from classics like The Shining and Jacob’s Ladder while also placing our characters in a criminally underused setting in horror (an abandoned ocean liner!), Triangle is the rare kind of horror movie that works even better on a re-watch.

Plus, the flick stars underrated Scream Queen Melissa George in one of her most memorable roles.


2. Maniac (2012)

The original Maniac is one hell of a gnarly exploitation flick, but I’d argue that it’s since been overshadowed by its insanely ambitious remake. Directed by genre veteran Franck Khalfoun and written by Alexandre Aja alongside Grégory Levasseur, this unexpectedly moving slasher miraculously uses a first-person perspective to make audiences sympathize with a reluctant madman.

Featuring quite a few memorable performances (I simply adore Elijah Wood’s voicework here as the murderous protagonist), as well as some impressive camerawork and a plethora of genuinely horrific death scenes, the 2012 film is a veritable smorgasbord of terrifying delights made more impactful by a deeply introspective script.


1. Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon (2007)

From Scream to The Cabin in the Woods, only a handful of horror films have successfully managed to subvert the tropes that made the genre so popular in the first place. And what do these films all have in common? They’re written by people who genuinely love the movies that they’re satirizing. And if you’re going to judge the quality of a satire according to how passionate the filmmakers are about the material they’re commenting on, 2007’s Behind the Mask is clearly among the very best.

A comedic fusion of tongue-in-cheek mockumentary filmmaking with an earnest dissection of classic slasher flicks, there’s a reason why hardcore fans have been clamoring for a sequel to Scott Glosserman’s opus for nearly two decades. And while the film lures audiences into a false sense of security with its wacky humor, the final act proves that Leslie Vernon is right up there with Michael, Jason and Freddy when it comes to having a killer instinct.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Books

‘See No Evil’ – WWE’s First Horror Movie Was This 2006 Slasher Starring Kane

Published

on

see no evil

With there being an overlap between wrestling fans and horror fans, it only made sense for WWE Studios to produce See No Evil. And much like The Rock’s Walking Tall and John Cena’s The Marine, this 2006 slasher was designed to jumpstart a popular wrestler’s crossover career; superstar Glenn “Kane” Jacobs stepped out of the ring and into a run-down hotel packed with easy prey. Director Gregory Dark and writer Dan Madigan delivered what the WWE had hoped to be the beginning of “a villain franchise in the vein of Jason, Freddy and Pinhead.” In hindsight, See No Evil and its unpunctual sequel failed to live up to expectations. Regardless of Jacob Goodnight’s inability to reach the heights of horror’s greatest icons, his films are not without their simple slasher pleasures.

See No Evil (previously titled Goodnight and Eye Scream Man) was a last gasp for a dying trend. After all, the Hollywood resurgence of big-screen slashers was on the decline by the mid-2000s. Even so, that first Jacob Goodnight offering is well aware of its genre surroundings: the squalid setting channels the many torturous playgrounds found in the Saw series and other adjacent splatter pics. Also, Gregory Dark’s first major feature — after mainly delivering erotic thrillers and music videos  — borrows the mustardy, filthy and sweaty appearance of Platinum Dunes’ then-current horror output. So, visually speaking, See No Evil fits in quite well with its contemporaries.

Despite its mere  setup — young offenders are picked off one by one as they clean up an old hotel — See No Evil is more ambitious than anticipated. Jacob Goodnight is, more or less, another unstoppable killing machine whose traumatic childhood drives him to torment and murder, but there is a process to his mayhem. In a sense, a purpose. Every new number in Goodnight’s body count is part of a survival ritual with no end in sight. A prior and poorly mended cranial injury, courtesy of Steven Vidler’s character, also influences the antagonist’s brutal streak. As with a lot of other films where a killer’s crimes are religious in nature, Goodnight is viscerally concerned with the act of sin and its meaning. And that signature of plucking out victims’ eyes is his way of protecting his soul.

see no evil

Image: The cast of See No Evil enters the Blackwell Hotel.

Survival is on the mind of just about every character in See No Evil, even before they are thrown into a life-or-death situation. Goodnight is processing his inhumane upbringing in the only way he can, whereas many of his latest victims have committed various crimes in order to get by in life. The details of these offenses, ranging from petty to severe, can be found in the film’s novelization. This more thorough media tie-in, also penned by Madigan, clarified the rap sheets of Christine (Christina Vidal), Kira (Samantha Noble), Michael (Luke Pegler) and their fellow delinquents. Readers are presented a grim history for most everyone, including Vidler’s character, Officer Frank Williams, who lost both an arm and a partner during his first encounter with the God’s Hand Killer all those years ago. The younger cast is most concerned with their immediate wellbeing, but Williams struggles to make peace with past regrets and mistakes.

While the first See No Evil film makes a beeline for its ending, the literary counterpart takes time to flesh out the main characters and expound on scenes (crucial or otherwise). The task requires nearly a third of the book before the inmates and their supervisors even reach the Blackwell Hotel. Yet once they are inside the death trap, the author continues to profile the fodder. Foremost is Christine and Kira’s lock-up romance born out of loyalty and a mutual desire for security against their enemies behind bars. And unlike in the film, their sapphic relationship is confirmed. Meanwhile, Michael’s misogyny and bigotry are unmistakable in the novelization; his racial tension with the story’s one Black character, Tye (Michael J. Pagan), was omitted from the film along with the repeated sexual exploitation of Kira. These written depictions make their on-screen parallels appear relatively upright. That being said, by making certain characters so prickly and repulsive in the novelization, their rare heroic moments have more of an impact.

Madigan’s book offers greater insight into Goodnight’s disturbed mind and harrowing early years. As a boy, his mother regularly doled out barbaric punishments, including pouring boiling water onto his “dangling bits” if he ever “sinned.” The routine maltreatment in which Goodnight endured makes him somewhat sympathetic in the novelization. Also missing from the film is an entire character: a back-alley doctor named Miles Bennell. It was he who patched up Goodnight after Williams’ desperate but well-aimed bullet made contact in the story’s introduction. Over time, this drunkard’s sloppy surgery led to the purulent, maggot-infested head wound that, undoubtedly, impaired the hulking villain’s cognitive functions and fueled his violent delusions.

See No Evil

Image: Dan Madigan’s novelization for See No Evil.

An additional and underlying evil in the novelization, the Blackwell’s original owner, is revealed through random flashbacks. The author described the hotel’s namesake, Langley Blackwell, as a deviant who took sick pleasure in defiling others (personally or vicariously). His vile deeds left a dark stain on the Blackwell, which makes it a perfect home for someone like Jacob Goodnight. This notion is not so apparent in the film, and the tie-in adaptation says it in a roundabout way, but the building is haunted by its past. While literal ghosts do not roam these corridors, Blackwell’s lingering depravity courses through every square inch of this ill-reputed establishment and influences those who stay too long.

The selling point of See No Evil back then was undeniably Kane. However, fans might have been disappointed to see the wrestler in a lurking and taciturn role. The focus on unpleasant, paper-thin “teenagers” probably did not help opinions, either. Nevertheless, the first film is a watchable and, at times, well-made straggler found in the first slasher revival’s death throes. A modest budget made the decent production values possible, and the director’s history with music videos allowed the film a shred of style. For meatier characterization and a harder demonstration of the story’s dog-eat-dog theme, though, the novelization is worth seeking out.

Jen and Sylvia Soska, collectively The Soska Sisters, were put in charge of 2014’s See No Evil 2. This direct continuation arrived just in time for Halloween, which is fitting considering its obvious inspiration. In place of the nearly deserted hospital in Halloween II is an unlucky morgue receiving all the bodies from the Blackwell massacre. Familiar face Danielle Harris played the ostensible final girl, a coroner whose surprise birthday party is crashed by the  resurrected God’s Hand Killer. In an effort to deliver uncomplicated thrills, the Soskas toned down the previous film’s heavy mythos and religious trauma, as well as threw in characters worth rooting for. This sequel, while more straightforward than innovative, pulls no punches and even goes out on a dark note.

The chances of seeing another See No Evil with Kane attached are low, especially now with Glenn Jacobs focusing on a political career. Yet there is no telling if Jacob Goodnight is actually gone, or if he is just playing dead.

See No Evil

Image: Katharine Isabelle and Lee Majdouba’s characters don’t notice Kane’s Jacob Goodnight character is behind them in See No Evil 2.

Continue Reading